it matters but it wasnt a big enough reason for me to get the 360 over the ps3.
it matters but it wasnt a big enough reason for me to get the 360 over the ps3.
So you argue that we shouldn't argue?
“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”
- George Orwell, ‘1984’
| Porcupine_I said: So you argue that we shouldn't argue? |
Yepp xD
Im sorry but I think people need to realize that these plastic boxes are to have fun, not to feel superior over someone else.
Then you're trapped in your lovely nest, and the things you used to own, now they own you.
It's what people do when they can't argue about quality.
Going to play devils advocate.
Why do you care about people who like to talk about tech? >_
What irks me is people who continuously try to detract a thread by posting meaningless spam about how much you don't care about something. If you enter a thread discussing tech, expect people to talk about that. I mean sure, it can get a bit much with the same old hyperbolic arguments but that is the nature of things around here.
JayWood2010 said:
Then you're trapped in your lovely nest, and the things you used to own, now they own you. |
I don't see why people enthusiastic about hardware, the game industry, and console sales shouldn't speculate about console power.
If you haven't noticed, the core of this site is about console sales. All else held equal, people would prefer better graphics, and having better graphics could lead to higher sales. It's a very relevant and interesting business/industry topic.
Stop implicitly calling others biased (or according to your logic, fanboys) by touting how unbiased you are all the time. Stop making these meta threads demanding discussion be stop.
You're like those politicians who obsess over how big their flag pins are:

We get it. You're "unbiased". We got the messsage. No really, we got it.
User was banned for this post.
yo_john117


Just as it's your opinion that pixels don't matter, it is the opinion of some where they do. Bit hypocritical to suggest opinions are okay, while criticizing them.
Akvod said:
I don't see why people enthusiastic about hardware, the game industry, and console sales shouldn't speculate about console power. If you haven't noticed, the core of this site is about console sales. All else held equal, people would prefer better graphics, and having better graphics could lead to higher sales. It's a very relevant and interesting business/industry topic. Stop implicitly calling others biased (or according to your logic, fanboys) by touting how unbiased you are all the time. Stop making these meta threads demanding discussion be stop. You're like those politicians who obsess over how big their flag pins are: We get it. You're "unbiased". We got the messsage. No really, we got it. |
Now I know you dont like me akvod. Youve made this clear since early on in 2013 but there is no reason to come in these threads and act like this. In fact I dont believe i mentioned me being biased or unbiased in this thread. I also never mentioned how well each has sold in this thead. In fact the only thing i really am asking is "What is the point in argueing over pixels"
You seem to have failed in answering this question i posted and went off-topic just to take a jab at me. Was that really necessary and do you feel better now?
JayWood2010 said:
|
I think you've failed to answer my question:
Is a discussion about a console's graphics irrelevant to this site, the topic of console sales or the gaming industry in general?

