JoeTheBro said:
Just an insider, but don't put him higher than Thuway or any of the other ones. |
Well gaf is putting him higher than CBOAT
JoeTheBro said:
Just an insider, but don't put him higher than Thuway or any of the other ones. |
Well gaf is putting him higher than CBOAT
JoeTheBro said:
Hahaha you're fine but this image is just too perfect as a reply. |
lol haha xD xD xD
manny10032 said:
Well gaf is putting him higher than CBOAT |
They shouldn't. He just posts a lot less and they are in the moment.
Last post of his I saw was back during summer for XBONE manufacturing problems.
|
manny10032 said: ethomaz, your a gaf member, who is Matt on there? |
A reliable leaker (or inside)... I think just mods knows he is... so I think I didn't help at all.
He is not that active late times.
|
manny10032 said: Well gaf is putting him higher than CBOAT |
The difference is that CBOAT is a person or more than one person that have close relationship with insiders... Matt is the insider (a big one btw).
ironmanDX said:
Wow, you guys are just something else. The Wii U can hit 1080p ffs and that ting got picked on for not being powerful enough?!?... Are some on this site so blind with bias that you can't see that this is just developers and not the hardware? Forza hits the 1080p 60fps but instead, lets talk about the far less impressive looking games running in 720p and pretend it's a big deal..... Yeah, like a lot of people on this site play CoD... |
Yes, the Wii U can hit 1080P, but visually it would be inferior to a Xbone game running at 720P. Like I said, anyone who isn't in denial and knows anything about computer hardware knows there's a significant difference.
Prove me wrong, please. Inform me on how a 7790 level GPU with only 32MB EDRAM isn't at a disadvantage against a 7970M/7870 level GPU with GDDR5? Microsoft is also preserving 10% of the GPU power for the OS, so that makes it more 7770 level for games, the EDRAM is a bitch to use and it simply isn't a lot to work with for graphically intensive games.
Care to explain how the difference is negligble?
edit: Don't even kn ow I'm waisting my time arguing with you, it's pretty obvious that Xbox fans will deny this no matter how much proof is presented to them
why are you guys talking about matt, did he say something?
I am Torgo, I take care of the place while the master is away.

"Hes the clown that makes the dark side fun.. Torgo!"
Ha.. i won my bet, but i wasnt around to gloat because im on a better forum! See ya guys on Viz


Daisuke72 said:
Yes, the Wii U can hit 1080P, but visually it would be inferior to a Xbone game running at 720P. Like I said, anyone who isn't in denial and knows anything about computer hardware knows there's a significant difference.
Prove me wrong, please. Inform me on how a 7790 level GPU with only 32MB EDRAM isn't at a disadvantage against a 7970M/7870 level GPU with GDDR5? Microsoft is also preserving 10% of the GPU power for the OS, so that makes it more 7770 level for games, the EDRAM is a bitch to use and it simply isn't a lot to work with for graphically intensive games.
Care to explain how the difference is negligble?
edit: Don't even know I'm waisting my time arguing with you, it's pretty obvious that Xbox fans will deny this no matter how much proof is presented to them |
Lol....
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5670407
Now please, go away.
| DD_Bwest said: why are you guys talking about matt, did he say something? |
He did.
@ironmanDX