Post launch/Post completion, game is finished way before it hits shelves, final month is polishing and it goes gold 3 - 4 weeks before hand.

Really? Nintendo gamers even buy expensive disc versions of DLC. Just look at the Luigi DLC for NSMBU!

The DLC for Fire Emblem did quite well though. As of April 17th over 240k people had bought the game and half of them had bought at least one DLC pack. That sounds pretty decent to me. They released several DLC packs for New Super Mario Bros. 2 but I don't know how they all performed, and they recently released DLC for Pikmin 3.

In short I don't think it's as simple as "Nintendo gamers don't want DLC".

Maybe its like SC where its on the console but Ubisoft doesn't advertise it.

Why in the hell does ubisoft even keep trying ?

Bought AC3, played it till the End -> was happy. I just lpayed a good Game with a good Story. DLC doesn't interest me, so will still pick up the U-Version.

I'm not hardcore enough to pay for content that should have been an unlock/included in the game at release anyway. *sigh* I miss expansion packs, they were actually worth it.

well you heard wrong about revelations. 

Oh, so only one woth DLC.

I dont understand why all those third party devs kill their sales. Why not wait after the game is on sale before making all this crap public?

WiiU version costs +$10€
or
WiiU version lacks multiplayer
or
WiiU version will be 1 game the competition will get a trilogy
or
WiiU version wont get DLC
or
WiiU wont get  GOTY/COMPLETE edition
or
INSERT OTHER "sabotage on purpose to have a reason to drop WiiU support" THING

And tbh thinking about DLC should be ILLEGAL before the game goes gold. If the game goes gold devs still would have enough time to make DLC. And if they say "but but but our artists etc would be idle then...." well come up with new GAME IDEADS new IP etc. it would be the perfect time.

The two scenarios are hardly comparable.