Microsoft is increasing its number of Xbox Live servers to 300,000, up from only 500 at launch and 15,000 today.
let's shed some light on the 300,000-server cloud architecture. Part of the server setup will be used to compute scenes in games. Microsoft is targeting areas that aren't sensitive to latency, a common complaint around cloud-powered games. "There are some things in a video game world, though, that don't necessarily need to be updated every frame or don't change that much in reaction to what's going on."
Microsoft is clearly betting on the long-term viability of cloud gaming, something that could theoretically make up for its lower specifications in time
Result and target!
for every Xbox One] we're provisioning the CPU and storage equivalent of three Xbox Ones on the cloud. We're doing that flat out so that any game developer can assume that there's roughly three times the resources immediately available to their game, so they can build bigger, persistent levels that are more inclusive for players. They can do that out of the game.
likely scenario=
xbox without cloud connection is weaker then the xbox with cloud connection
how will devs cope with that? will xbox users get the options for 2 different performance setting?
HOW DARE THEY!
to summarise
First of all it has no games and the games it does have look like well ... terribly 720p! 2 theoretical performance setting! how dare they give 99% of the userbase a less optimal setting.
It has the cloud and clouds are just water in the sky!
kinect is just "meh"and noone is gonna use it so better forget about it.
"I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007
Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions
Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.