Do not mistake social contract for social solidarity. The notion of socialism is closer to the later rather than the former.

I don't know where this notion that anything the State does is automatically socialism as opposed to, well, statism. That's close to doublespeak IMO.

I myself think that there isn't anything the government does that a private company can't do better... and public education and infraestructure are things that preced socialism (but I won't dewell in that to far), and you are still confunding pure free initiative vs estatism with capitalism vs socialism. But that don't matter, as far as we agree that "pure" socialism is a cancer and most of its avocates have hidden agenda I'm fine. I'm not libertarian or total free market so won't discuss against you that some services can't be left for private companies because they only do profitable investiments, and there are things that don't profit or that for it to be profitable much wouldn't have acess...

But food stamps aren't a thing i approve in the way it's applied (at least here) there is no return, just "donation of taxes" to the alleged poor... but initiatives as the infraestructure being built with government funds employing people in dire needs I can support because I see a win situation for everybody (and I also see the benefits of education support, but not always done right)... but I simply can't acept most of the "rights" people claim are needed support from tax money.

It almost sounds like you're saying "Socialism" and "Freedom and liberty" are opposites.  Also, starting your own business isn't harder to do that signing up for welfare.  You can start your own business pretty easily.

Yeah I actually am saying that Socialism and freedom are opposites. Would you disagree? I would argue that freedom and equality are mutually exclusive. You can have one or the other, but not both. 

And I don't know about that, I was definitely exaggerating. But I can tell you it's illegal for a little kid to open up a lemonade stand in the United States. You have to jump through hoops to follow the thousands of regulations that businesses must follow nowadays. 

Are we still spending 1 trillion a year on Defense and things to do with defense?

I would rather the kid down the street get healthcare and food than buy yet another fence for some guy in Afghanistan or another road for them to blow up a week later.

Cut welfare some more if you want cut anything. Use donations to your advantage!

There's always an overlap between many things politics.  I'll just leave this here as to make my point http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_socialism

I say cut costs everywhere not just on social care but on everything that is a drain oh and the unemployment numbers are steadily growing so no more welfare.

Just wondering, are you saying you're fine with just cutting spending and, as a result, leaving many more problems politically for the sake of economics?  I know many people don't know or understand, but there are many consequences to cutting in any department.  The severity of the consequences vary, but cutting from everywhere will stir up a shit storm.

What will be a greater shit storm, cutting costs and taxes or raising taxes past the ceiling so that people could get government care ?

A kid can't sign up for welfare either.  My parents own a business, and they say signing up for Welfare is difficult (but the business part isn't so difficult).  It depends on what your business is.  There are a few ways to run your business. 

edit: I forgot to address your first paragraph.  Socialism isn't the same thing as equality, and I do not think freedom and equality are mutually exclusive anyway.  They may have some contradictions, but they are not opposites.