Yes, the chance I get banned for this is almost 100%. The moderators of this site seem to be very biased Sony fans also (so not only 99% of the internet), and I won’t respect people who are supposed to be professional and neutral in their work. They don’t necessary ban people who bash or insult Nintendo/Microsoft-products and gamers because that is considered humor. Not only on this site, but many more consider negative (sarcastic) posts about Nintendo/Microsoft funny and anything that sounds in the SLIGHTEST negative about Sony is considered trolling. Once you joke about Sony (although it is true for some part), you’re getting banned, trolled or bashed. In this thread I want to show that people who act in the same manner like me, but toward another company than Sony don’t get banned for it. The pictures below me are taken and collected because I got more mad any time I got banned for the smallest things. I felt that sometime would be the right time to show the bias of the moderators to you all.
Once I got banned for this comment:
http://postimg.org/image/5z647ssot/
I commented on the thread where it was claimed Naughty Dog changed the gameïndustry and if they would do it again with The Last of Us. I said this because I don’t like interactive movies for its limited gameplay and too much focus on story-telling. You can’t really call this trolling since the games Naughty Dogs makes are really interactive movies. This is a fact. I’m not the only one saying it, many MANY others and journalists simply call Naughty Dog’s games interactive movies (and not even in a bad context). About the 7/8 hours is also true. I can’t get banned here for saying a fact. I completed UC2 in 8 hours, Heavy Rain in 6 hours and UC3 in 7,5 hours. And its obviously a problem I want to play games with bigger content and variety/complexity in gameplay.
http://postimg.org/image/f88ahx1kt/
Just another guy got banned for calling The Last of Us a movie. Even if more people share the same opinion about Naughty Dog’s games, it is called ‘trolling’, but only because the moderators were really excited for this game.
Go look it up, The Last of Us is SO many times associated with movies and thus not only by me and the other guy. You can’t troll about a fact. The Last of Us IS an interactive movie experience. I don't want real games to go that way.
http://postimg.org/image/wmx43xo3h/
In this thread about Nintendo copy-pasting their boxarts he called Nintendo boxarts ‘’lazy’’. If I get banned for calling The Last of Us an interactive movie (which is an opinion but I stated it like a fact) he should get banned too for calling Nintendo boxarts ‘’lazy’’ which is an opinion stating like it’s a fact, which is not. Some agree Nintendo box arts to be lazy, and others not. Just like some agree The Last of Us being a movie, and others not.
http://postimg.org/image/ynj2b0uv1/
Doesn’t get banned for calling the Wii U a ‘’trainwreck’’. This is still something subjective since the Wii U sold in the same time period around launch a lot more than PS360. It is selling bad NOW for obvious reasons (no games = no units sold = logic). Wii U also had one of the most successful console-launches. The moderators agree Wii U being a trainwreck although the launch proves its potential. Some games sell comparable to third party games on PS360 despite the Wii U user-base being 200-300% smaller.
http://postimg.org/image/p9hq4z41p/
This guy is being sarcastic about the Wii U’s memory by saying ‘’Have fun’’. This is exactly the same way of ‘trolling’ I did with The Last of Us. Most Wii U games or apps don’t require that much memory at all. You can buy many games via the eShop without the need of a HDD if you have the 32gigs version. Also, you can expend the memory by purchasing a HDD. Another reason this guy should get banned, because there are many options for Wii U’s memory to expand.
http://postimg.org/image/u6vaq360t/
Think-man’s first reaction to the thread about the EA guy calling the Wii U ‘crap’ was ‘’Will I get banned if I say I kinda agree with him?’’ Although he clarifies he was talking about third party not making money on Nintendo-consoles in the second comment, he’s first sentence indicates he agrees with everything the guy said. He should’ve got banned for this before he clarified his sentence since I got banned many times in only minutes.
Also, third party don’t make money on Nintendo consoles? Wii got many million sellers. Even if they’re games you don’t like, they’re still third party games (Just Dance and party-games). Resident Evil makes money on Nintendo consoles, Sonic makes money, Dragon Quest makes money, Monster Hunter makes money, Tales of makes money, Mario and Sonic makes money, Star Wars makes money, Lego makes money, Monkey Ball makes money, ZumbaGuitarHeroEpicMickeyCookingmamaCOD- I don’t have to go on. Stating third party doesn’t make money on Nintendo-consoles is trolling, he should’ve get banned for it. Generic brown shooters satisfy the PS360 user-base and not the Nintendo user-base, that is correct. But those games aren’t considered the only third party games out there. Platformers, party and dance games don’t make money on PS3. Can I say the same now about third party selling bad on Playstation platforms?
Another thing: ‘’I don’t know if the Wii U is crap since I’ve never tried it.’’ So there is a chance for Wii U being crap? A product being crap, or a movie, lazy, less of more than other product are subjective. Many Wii U users or gamers who tried Wii U call it a fun gaming system.
http://postimg.org/image/6kzohnd4t/
More than obvious trolling the thread about the graphics of the Wii U game X, calling it ugly and Wii U underpowered and at worst on par with PS360? (almost all E3 Wii U exclusives being 1080p/60fps what PS360 did with no game at all doesn’t mean something apparently, not to the mods for sure) , although >90% disagrees, he keeps on stating he’s opinion like a fact. He did this many more times in 1 thread then I did overall, and I get banned for one sentence about The Last of Us being an interactive movie. He didn’t got banned at all.
http://postimg.org/image/9t45uozel/
Explanation for not releasing GTA5 on Wii U? Not necessary. We all know how stupid Nintendo is, right? Let’s ignore the fact GTA Chinatown Wars sold more units than the PSP version. The ‘’stupidest thing ever’’-opinion based on literally nothing is now a fact on VGChartz,congratz. Look at that non-Sony related avatar of his. There’s no way for him to be biased.
http://postimg.org/image/vogr1narh/
I got banned yet again. For a thread derailment, laying of Sony, Sony Fans and its games in one sentence, apparently. Let’s take a look. This is the comment I got banned for:
http://postimg.org/image/6jpqo8bb1/
Talking about exaggeration. The only thing I did here was in some form (exaggerated and sarcastic) laying of Sony fans. I never trash talked Sony itself or the games. It isn’t really a thread derailment because it is just stupid how Sony fans cancel their Battlefield 4 pre-order because it is a unnoticeable resolution lower. The moderators get so worked up by negative Sony comments they get delusional.
These are the only examples I found when actually looking for them and I didn't look for long. During some periods I’m not at this site at all for days, so imagine the trolls not getting banned for other comments. Internet journalism has been terrible since the beginning of this generation in especially the way they act to Nintendo (also Microsoft since the Xbox One reveal, despite Xbox One basically being the same as PS4 except having more exclusives). I noticed more and more Nintendo fans leaving this site and internet in general, because no one gets banned for bashing or claiming ridiculous statements about Nintendo. I don’t blame Nintendo fans for leaving internet forums like this one.
