By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Penello specifies why X1vsPS4 performance difference is overstated

Blood_Tears said:
Mr Khan said:
Blood_Tears said:
This guys reeks of desperation..

Negative arguments need more support than positive ones. Flesh out your statement, or you could be deemed to merely be trolling.


Trolling?  lol  Because I don’t like a Microsoft employee?  Are you a mod for Microsoft or vgchartz?   Okay, how about I think Penello is a hypricrite who said specs don’t matter and has spent a lot of time in the past days going on about how there is no difference between the systems. For someone who says that specs don’t matter, he is acting rather desperate as of late. Is that better now?  More clear?

Thats not at all what Mr Khan said.

You need to backup your statement in your initial post, otherwise it comes off as "merely trolling". I agree with Mr Khan. One liners like that dont really add much to this thread other than to flame other users.

This has got nothing to do with your dislike for the MS employee.



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|

Around the Network

Technically, I think I am the best in here. I am like a guru in the technical arts and I'm not joking. I should be like a local authority when such matters arise. Ask and I shall give you yes / no answers on any subject.



Ex Graphics Whore.

Shinobi-san said:
Blood_Tears said:
Mr Khan said:
Blood_Tears said:
This guys reeks of desperation..

Negative arguments need more support than positive ones. Flesh out your statement, or you could be deemed to merely be trolling.


Trolling?  lol  Because I don’t like a Microsoft employee?  Are you a mod for Microsoft or vgchartz?   Okay, how about I think Penello is a hypricrite who said specs don’t matter and has spent a lot of time in the past days going on about how there is no difference between the systems. For someone who says that specs don’t matter, he is acting rather desperate as of late. Is that better now?  More clear?

Thats not at all what Mr Khan said.

You need to backup your statement in your initial post, otherwise it comes off as "merely trolling". I agree with Mr Khan. One liners like that dont really add much to this thread other than to flame other users.

This has got nothing to do with your dislike for the MS employee.


Thanks for your input. Everyone has been talking about Penello for days about CPU/GPU, extra GPU, specs don't matter. Blah blah blah. Just check the first post after the op. Without fleshing out my earlier statement it should have been pretty obvious what I meant. Anyways, like i said thanks for the input but i am done with this topic now..



Blood_Tears said:
Shinobi-san said:

Thats not at all what Mr Khan said.

You need to backup your statement in your initial post, otherwise it comes off as "merely trolling". I agree with Mr Khan. One liners like that dont really add much to this thread other than to flame other users.

This has got nothing to do with your dislike for the MS employee.


Thanks for your input. Everyone has been talking about Penello for days about CPU/GPU, extra GPU, specs don't matter. Blah blah blah. Just check the first post after the op. Without fleshing out my earlier statement it should have been pretty obvious what I meant. Anyways, like i said thanks for the input but i am done with this topic now..

Xenostar gave a reason atleast



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|

Machiavellian said:

Ohh you are going to pull the free country bit.  Why give an opinion and shrare it if you are not going to take the time to support it.  So are you stating you will just make any type of baseless comment without taking the few moments to make sure what you are saying is correct?

As for someone who also work with cloud servers, datacenters and develop cloud based applications that are distributed on millions of servers I call your statement more BS.  I know what the cloud can do and I also know what a platform specifically designed for its strenghts can also accomplish.  Basically Orleans which is MS cloud development platform was created to assit developers in creating cloud based distributed code.  Fully understanding how that setup can take games to another platform is not looking at the bigger picture.  

Who cares where they were 3 months ago, its evident that they are not there now.  As for the X1, its more like a 360 than PS4.  Exactly what is the same about the X1 that make it like the PS4.  Besides dropping the online bit, the 2 consoles are very different.  As for Fifa, are you saying Sony is desparate for giving Knack away for free in a Bundle for Japan???  Is this somehow un-natural for a new console to come bundled with a game on release as incentive to purchase the system.  Evidently your evidence is more personal than anything else.  You act as if Sony and MS are not competiting for sales. 

You implied that preorders is this something that will define this generation, just make sure you see beyound first day sales.  Even now you talk about Fifa as if MS is desparate but forget that Sony is giving a free game in Japan.

I pulled the free country bit because i made my point, and you get all up in my face and upset about it... hey just cause I think MS have screwed up royally and continue to do that, ... just chill out.

I guess we will have to wait until the cloud has proven itself to see who is right, but as of yet, even MS have been unable to prove this tech works in games (please don't tell me that drivertars is a good example of this tech otherwise you will have lost all credibility).... It may work in terms of crunching accounts data on a server and sending it client side to display (which doesnt need to display stuff in milliseconds), but as games don't work like that... well I look forward to the day when someone can say, the cloud has improved the performance of the console. It's taken 6-7 years for companies to reach the limits of the hardware of the current gen (and they can still push it further if they had the patience)... the gains they can make by improving their code locally on the console far outweigh the internet bandwidth speed issues and processing that happen on a server farm somewhere in the world. Games need to update many times a second... they are updating quicker than sending a data packet to a server farm, processing it, and sending it back. Ohhh what about collating the data of 1 million users and presenting the result to a console... you know what when you start to do crap like that the data you get back is just crap anyway... and will not present anything useful to 99% of the games. This is my point, the cloud is a PR BS statement, it can do something and 300,000 servers, but nothing that will help 99% of the games that exist (isn't that what were talking about or are you saying in some case situation it may be better to do something on the cloud). 

Is it true that all these cloud servers will improve Multiplayer games hosting and may provide less issues on day 1 of an MMO launching... yep... .single player games not 1 bit. You know what, dedicated servers like we've had for the last however many years would have the same benefits on hosting, and having better managed MMO launches would solve the other. 

Tell me how different the XboxOne and Ps4 are so different that they will both have 95% of the same features and games. Why is it that many people are saying "look at the games" when trying to compare the two consoles. It's because that and the actual performance to play the games is effectively the two things that matter. Let's not start getting into the tick for tat, but kinect can see in the dark when PS eye cannot... I talking about back of the box core features. The two consoles are now the same now that DRM has gone.

Lol somehow i dont see giving a internally made game such as knack away free to Japan is anywhere the same as having to pay out $millions of dollars to a 3rd party game. Seriously are you really that confused that you cannot see what you are saying is just silly. 



Making an indie game : Dead of Day!

Around the Network
Adinnieken said:
petalpusher said:


That's not how mathematic works.

 

(1 CU x 853 mhz x 64 ops x 2 cycles)  x 12  

is still the same than

12 CU x 853 Mhz x 64 ops x 2 cycles

= 1 310 208 fl ops

 

A 72% increase would be this gpu at 1376 Mhz (and probably burn quickly)

No.  A GPU is parrallel.  Therefore CU's can run independent of each other.  I can have one CU running a job each clock cycle, and another running one job over 853 clock cycles.  Because those each of those CUs will reduce the time to run an operation, the effect of those savings become accumulative.  For example, @ 800GHz I wouldn't be able to run 1000 operations.    This means it's capable of running 57 more operations. 

PS4 1 CU @ 800MHz @ 943 operations per clock cycle
XB1 1 CU @ 853MHz @ 1000 operations per clock cycle

So, at the end of one minute.

PS4 1CU @ 800MHz @ 943 operations per clock cycle = 754,400 operations per minute. 
XB1 1CU @ 853MHz @ 1000 operations per clock cycle = 853,000 operations per minute.

98,600 operations more.  Or 105 more clock cycles to do the same amount of work.  That's a 12% difference in performance right there.  Not to mention, that's one CU.

If you take into account the greater number of CUs (18 vs 12) in the PS4 that still adds up to a nearly 25% advantage to the PS4 (multiplying your numbers by the number of CUs). Considering the way GPUs are designed and how they're generally suited and used for parralel processing, the PS4 still has a significant advantage.

That's without looking at the increased ROPs, texture and pixel fillrates or the added ASE's in the PS4.



dsgrue3 said:

I notice your willingness to attack some of GAF posters, but are unwilling to agree with Penello.

Go ahead, don't be shy.


He did that concerning the dgpu



HeresHoping said:
Even when things are explained the blind and ignorant continue as they always have. Truth revealed to you guys is like pearls before swine. Just keep on keep'n on know-it-alls.


Which truth is that?????????????????



Legend11 said:
Xenostar said:
Legend11 said:
Xenostar said:
Subie_Greg said:
PS4 is more powerful. Both on paper and in actual real world performance. Yes you can optimize on the Xbox One. But you can also do so on Ps4 (just pointing that out because Xbots now keep bringing that up for some reason)

Mutliplatform games will look the same as far as the eye test goes. So what difference will it make.

But PS4 is more powerful and you can twist and spin shit to mean whatever you like. Go ahead and add 8GB of ram with esram and times that by the month Xbox One comes out and yada yada so on and so forth. Whatever makes you feel better about the product you want to buy

I do enjoy reading the threads of Xbox One is almost as powerful = just as powerful = you should buy Xbox One haha.


Totally now if they could say "its almost as powerfull" and follow up with "and its alot cheaper" then that would make sence, but its way more expensive, its just a crazy place to start trying to win people over from. 

You would sell a car by going its almost as fast as Car X and we will only charge you more money for it!


It has a lot more features and they really are different beasts in that regard.  For example if you took a PS4 out of the box and hooked it up and then said "PS4 on" what would happen?  What about if you wanted to talk to someone on your friends list, would saying "PS4 skype Iluvyermom" to your PS4 open a window and contact your friend?  What about if you wanted to exercise with a game would a PS4 version be able to tell you which muscles are currently being stressed or tell what your heart rate currently is by looking at you?  There are many things the Xbox One can do that the PS4 simply can't so it's not as simple as saying one is better because neither one is better at everything.


Ill take the one thats better at games, than the one thats better at voice controls :)


So you're saying that PS4 is better at dance or fitness games for example?  What about quirky indie games that take advantage of features the Xbox One has that PS4 either can't do as well or can't do at all?  Apparently one of the best HD games shown so far is Titanfall and that features graphics that while good aren't pushing the system by any means yet it's completely owning the PS4 lineup in terms of awards and media attention.

Have you been to the future?



Legend11 said:
Turkish said:
Legend11 said:
Turkish said:
Source is neogaf. Albert is talking bullshit as usual and gaffers are calling him out http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=673713&page=5


There's just a bunch of clowns arguing against what Albert said.  I really get a kick out of the ones demanding to know what the PS4's CPU final clock rate is for example when looking at his numbers yet they had no problems with the people that basically pulled "40%" or "50%" performance difference between the two consoles out of the air without knowing the final clock rates for either of them.  There's been so much FUD spread and eager fanboys eating it up because it's what they wanted to hear.


Amongst those "clowns" are engineers who flat out call him out on his bullshit. According to Albert the 360 has more bandwith than Xbox one. http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=80953213&postcount=224


He ran his current facts by someone at the company that has a very indepth knowledge of the console.  As for those engineers could you provide a link where they benchmarked the Xbox One along with a picture of the development unit in their possession?  Yeah I thought so.

Can you provide the relevent information backing up Penello???? Provide proof of Penello's claims? Not just the word of a MS corporate shill!

Yep thought so