Am I the only one who thinks that when racing in a racing game, if you are looking at the trees and the crowds whilst driving, you are doing it wrong?

when will people realize that both is probably only a decision of preference of turn 10 and evolution? weather effects aren't more next gen as more frames and more physics calculations on the car ( i had rain already in my f1 game for n64 and forza horizon has dynamic lighting). more frames per second isn't more next gen as other great stuff because i already have 60fps in racing games this gen... forza could easily have the driveclub stuff and driveclub could easily have 60fps. they both did only have to go another way in the development cycle. 

the whole package will decide which is a bigger graphical powerhouse but nothing of the mentioned stuff is something which tells us if the game is more next gen as the other game as long as it means that other stuff will be so much worse that the whole package is less impressive.

right now i don't really see how any of both games is so much better as the other game from a technical perspective. both will outshine the other game in different sections.

probably also a reason why we didn't see many gaming sites telling us that driveclub nor forza are so impressive compared to the other racing games. at least not how they look right now as alpha/beta versions. 

but a ps4 racing game with the budget forza probably has should have easily an advantage. 

Downloaded the video's from gamersnyde and it looks like the game is shaping up pretty nicely.

Though, the image quality could be improved - aliasing is pretty bad atm, also quite a bit of pop-ins. On the plus side, it's considerably better than the build they had at E3. And the game looks likes pretty fun to play!