By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Movies & TV - Ben Affleck to Play Batman in Superman Vs. Batman Film (WTF!)

toadslayer72 said:
riderz13371 said:
Rumours circling the web say that Brian Cranston has been cast as Lex Luthor...

http://metro.co.uk/2013/08/24/bryan-cranston-confirmed-to-play-lex-luthor-in-batmanman-of-steel-3936111/


Now THAT makes sense. 


I would've preferred Cranston as Commissioner Gordon in a Batman reboot. He was great in the Year One Animated film. If he is bald as Luthor all I will see is Heisenberg.



Around the Network
wilco said:
JWeinCom said:
riderz13371 said:

Ben Affleck is set to star as Batman in Zack Snyder's Man of Steel sequel, Warner Bros. has announced.

“Ben provides an interesting counter-balance to Henry’s Superman," added director Snyder. He has the acting chops to create a layered portrayal of a man who is older and wiser than Clark Kent and bears the scars of a seasoned crime fighter, but retain the charm that the world sees in billionaire Bruce Wayne. I can’t wait to work with him.”


I was actually going to defend the choice of Affleck till I read that quote...  Seriously, the idea of Batman is a mentor to Superman is stupid.  DC faithful can correct me if I'm wrong (make mine Marvel), but I'm pretty sure Batman and Superman are supposed to have an equal relationship.  Definitely not enough respect, but Batman certainly wouldn't be a mentor to Superman ESPECIALLY when it comes to staying upbeat.

The problem with this movie isn't going to be Affleck.  The problem is that the Dark Knight was so successful that they tried to Dark Knightify Superman without really understanding the specific needs of that character.

pezus said:

Alby_da_Wolf said:

Oh noez, I didn't actually read carefully the OP or even the thread title  : are they really mixing crappy Superman with Batman? Then Ben Assfleck is the smallest of their problems. Batman vs. Superman, that's not even jumping the shark, it's more like putting diarrhea instead of caramel and chocolate sauce on your ice-cream...

Dude! The Dark Knight Returns. Watch it, read it, live it.

 

 

The thing is that comic books and movies are different.  Within the world of comics, you can easily have a half a dozen or more interpretations of the same character running around at the same time in different books.  Different art styles, different writers, and so on at the same time.  With movies, you'll generally have one interpretation of a character dominating for 5 years to a decade.  This also is typically the most prominent and enduring image of that character.  Team ups work great in comics, but in movies, they're really tricky.


Even in the Dark Knight Returns Batman is old and grizzled with gray hair while superman *looks* young. Not because hes much younger than batman but because Superman doesn't age as quickly as normal humans so they are actually about the same age in that book.

The movie seems to want to make Batman literally older than superman and treat superman like a little punk kid. I don't know of any comic where batman was  "mentor" to superman. Superman isn't some circus performer or street kid turned orphan, hes a god, he doesn't need batmans tutelage. One of the cool things about the Superman, Batman relationship in the comics is that they have very different world views, one doesn't influence the other, they simply respect their differences and leave it at that. Superman deserves more respect than WB is giving him. He deserves to be a character with his own moral code and not someone that has to learn his morality from someone else (Apparently batman is going to teach him "not to kill" :rolleyes: ).


What are you on about?  Superman is early to mid 30's and Batman is late 30's to early 40's.  Depends on the story.  Superman is the first hero to go public (again, depending on the story--lately, the JSA are just assumed to have been at it decades before...and don't get me started on the New 52) and Batman has been in the business longer.  Supeman represents the best in humanity, is all powerful, and moral but he's an alien.  Batman represents the best in humanity because of his motivation and intelligence.  

It's God vs Human. 

Batman is able to compete with Superman because he's able to out-think Superman.  He's been doing it longer and he always has a plan.  That's it.  I don't know where you got "mentor" out of all of that.  Batman is older, wiser, and less naive.  That's it.  That's why Batman is a valued member of the Justice League despite having no powers.  He's got the best mind on the team.



Batman has also taught Clark some fighting techniques and how to "be scary" before, too. Supes is the big blue boyscout. Criminals know he won't kill (after Zod). Batman doesn't kill either but criminals are scared shitless of him.



People where cynical about Heath Ledger as Joker and people where cynical about Daniel Craig as James Bond. Both turned out fantastic, who know maybe Affleck will as well, he was awesome in "The Town"

Just calm down everybody you can´t change it anyway, its not a Microsoft production.



morenoingrato said:
I will NEVER accept him. Never.

Bale will always be Batman. ALWAYS.



I agree, He has down a great job in the trilogy. I really hope he stays as batman. He nailed that spot. I know they say he is a dick, I don't care, he plays batman Like a pro.



Around the Network
attaboy said:
Batman has also taught Clark some fighting techniques and how to "be scary" before, too. Supes is the big blue boyscout. Criminals know he won't kill (after Zod). Batman doesn't kill either but criminals are scared shitless of him.


Why in the hell would superman need to learn how to be "scary"? He can incinerate his foes by looking at them!

Superman does not need to learn anything from Batman. What is wrong with supes being a big blue boyscout. Thats his thing, let him be himself.



attaboy said:


What are you on about?  Superman is early to mid 30's and Batman is late 30's to early 40's.  Depends on the story.  Superman is the first hero to go public (again, depending on the story--lately, the JSA are just assumed to have been at it decades before...and don't get me started on the New 52) and Batman has been in the business longer.  Supeman represents the best in humanity, is all powerful, and moral but he's an alien.  Batman represents the best in humanity because of his motivation and intelligence.  

It's God vs Human. 

Batman is able to compete with Superman because he's able to out-think Superman.  He's been doing it longer and he always has a plan.  That's it.  I don't know where you got "mentor" out of all of that.  Batman is older, wiser, and less naive.  That's it.  That's why Batman is a valued member of the Justice League despite having no powers.  He's got the best mind on the team.


Thats not much of an age difference. If they really wanted to hammer home the "seasoned batman" idea they should have gotten an actor in their late 40's early 50's. In MoS they made superman 33, I guess to drive home the Jesus allegory even more than they already were with damn near every other scene. 33 is not a little boy, he shouldn't be dumb and naive.

I got "mentor" because that is the word thats been getting thrown around a lot. I don't have a problem with batman being a more experienced crime fighter, I just don't like the idea that he would need to teach Superman like hes Clarks Obi Wan, they got two different styles and thats the way it should be.



MegaManX said:
I know I'll get some flack for this, but it's nice to have an American playing an American created superhero again. I also realize that many of them are actually citizens now, but it just seems to be exaggerated how few of these actors were born American. Previously in the Batman series alone, we had Batman, Alfred, Scarecrow, Bane (he should have been played by someone of South American descent), Ra Al Ghul, Miranda, Falcone, Jim Gordan, and the Joker, all played by foreign actors, as well as the director.

Not to mention we have Superman, Spider-Man, Wolverine and Thor, Punisher, Mr. Fantastic plus Magneto (old and young), Professor X (old and young), and that is not even getting into some of the more minor heroes throughout superhero films much less the villians.

Don't get me wrong they are for the most part talented actors, bleh on Andrew Garfield, but then you got a franchise like Harry Potter and they actually had to research every actors past to make sure they were of full English ancestry, God forbid one of the 8 movies has an American in it, but that won't stop them from peddling it to us.

okay, okay... out of all of these I'm highlighting two. (Alfred and Thor).

I always thought Alfred was MEANT to be English? And Thor... is from Scandinavian mythology so has no reason to be American.

As for Affleck, I think he can pull off Bruce Wayne. Will reserve judgement on his Batface until I see him :3



Highwaystar101 said: trashleg said that if I didn't pay back the money she leant me, she would come round and break my legs... That's why people call her trashleg, because she trashes the legs of the people she loan sharks money to.

how in the hell is Ben Affleck considered a well respected actor is beyond my comprehension



wilco said:
attaboy said:
Batman has also taught Clark some fighting techniques and how to "be scary" before, too. Supes is the big blue boyscout. Criminals know he won't kill (after Zod). Batman doesn't kill either but criminals are scared shitless of him.


Why in the hell would superman need to learn how to be "scary"? He can incinerate his foes by looking at them!

Superman does not need to learn anything from Batman. What is wrong with supes being a big blue boyscout. Thats his thing, let him be himself.

Hey, I don't write the stuff!

But there have been times where (semi accurate example) a villain knows where a bomb is.  Superman would question them and not get an answer.  They know Superman wouldn't resort to hurting them to get answers.  Batman, on the other hand, always gets answers because they're scared of him.  Just how they've been written.