anthony64641 said: @richardhutnik I think the better argument is Hardware doesn't matter.... its all about the games. look at the ps2. GREAT library of games but it actually wasnt even the less powerful console of its generation (it was dreamcast). Lets look at the atari jaguar.. if you remember this console. it was atari last try at winning in the home console market. It was heavily advertised as the first 64 bit console. which was wayy more than the competitiver had at the time. but the problem that killed the system was lack of games. If Nintendo can do a U-turn and give us some quality games for the WiiU at a good price they could easily win this generation.. actually that goes for all 3 Companies (sony/micosoft/nintendo) |
Let's clarify the whole hardware power thing:
* More power can work against a console, IF it makes the console far more expensive to put out AND it makes coding for it to be difficult. For the Jaguar, the core tech was very hard to code for, so everyone coded for the 68000 in it, which didn't help. In the case of the PS3, you had that PLUS it also made it more expensive. To argue that more power is a bad thing is absurd, PARTICULARLY when it is easy to code for, and puts a system above and beyond a competitor.
* And one can say the games make the difference, but they either come internal, or heavily external (third-party). As I stated before, the Wii U is unlike the ONE and the PS4, so that means that it MUST sell well to get third-party support, and drive people to get it. It needs to have some compelling reason. Even if you slash prices, it still needs reasons. As of now, what is that? More Mario will get it to break into the threshold where it will turn the corner? Is this generation, which is now into open world and the likes of Elder Scrolls, suddenly going to want to get the next Zelda game? Or is it Smash Bros. which is what everyone wants? Or does Ninendo have some sort of new IP that will turn the tables?
In regards to Zelda, here are the sales numbers:
http://www.vgchartz.com/game/45669/the-legend-of-zelda-skyward-sword/
That is a solid number over 3.5 million.
But here is Skyrim:
http://www.vgchartz.com/gamedb/?name=skyrim
On BOTH the PS3 and 360 it outsold Nintendo's closes offerings, and cultural impact side, Skyrim is a MUCH stronger IP now than Zelda is. Zelda is solid, but doesn't grab the mind of gamers like Elder Scrolls does. Yes, that is stronger sales on platforms that have sold less than the Wii did.
The question is: Where is the turnaround supposed to come from?