JGarrett: I'm ready! I like discussing/debating things, I have several friends and a girlfriend who are terrific debaters, there's especially one guy who almost always owns me, he has such a grasp on so many varying fields and levels and he's a master of incorporating philosophy into his arguments and always finds fantastic analogies. Some may think I'm being overly aggressive and even rude towards John Lucas' person, but that's part of the challenge; I play it as I see it and like I've said before, there's a thick layer of sufarce coating but not a whole lot of primer. I don't dislike JL, on the contrary, he's an entertaining guy and no one can deny that he's good for the forums overall, just look at the size of this thread! It's mostly the argument itself and the techniques employed I'm opposed to.
Final-fan: That is true, Nintendo are known for holding their cards closer to the chest, and usually this is a good thing, a lot of games start getting hyped from the moment they're announced and shown and then they fail to live up to it. However, at this stage, I think they should open the floodgates and show that there is actual good stuff coming, their customer base deserve as much. Besides; it sort of goes against logic to refuse to hype games and then proceed to hype announcements at meets, Directs and exhibits (which also fail to live up to the hype).
Ah, "claqeur", not a common word but I found it descriptive and fitting, especially going off of my theatrics references in my posts. I'm not trying to insult his supporters, I just want them to do some thinking of their own instead of simply going ; "what he said" or "look at him go!".
Same can be said for me though, I'd love for some others to try to make an argument as well!
Seece: Hmm, I don't know, I think he genuinely wants everyone to read his posts he just doesn't want anyone to diagree on a meaningful level. I think the hope is that the posts will become too massive to respond to. If one were to take out the parts that are of no consequence though, there really isn't all that much to counter, and that's kind of what I'm getting at lately. This is a lot more about rhetoric, orator skill and simple, transparent box-in techniques designed to make the speaker look smart without any explanation as to why; in short, it's all about the wrapping rather than the content. Having read a lot of John Lucas' writing, I can tell that he's a pretty intelligent guy, but even intelligent people can subscribe to illogical and strange beliefs. And that's why all these tools are employed, it's pretty clever but once you learn someone's rhytm and text it's fairly easy to disarm, I imagine I'll have to spend 50% of my answers going whack-a-mole on attempts at rhetorical acrobatics and antics and the rest on actual points, most of which are entirely dependent on said acrobatics and uncritical reading.
As for why I'm not currently playing Super Mario 3D World; I don't have anything to play it on but I probably will after the next price cut.