By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Preserved dinosaur skin found

Hadrosaur skin found

Flickr/CLS Research Office (CC BY-SA 2.0)

University of Regina researcher Mauricio Barbi holds a hadrosaur skin sample that he and his colleagues hope will still contain melanosomes, the cellular organelles that contain pigments that control skin colour. “If we are able to observe the melanosomes and their shape, it will be the first time pigments have been identified in the skin of a dinosaur,” he said. “We have no real idea [yet] what the skin looks like. Is it green, blue, orange …”1

by David Catchpoole

Published: 23 July 2013 (GMT+10)

Such is the power of the dinosaurs-died-out-millions-of-years-ago paradigm, that it not only limits what scientists expect to find, but also bizarrely affects how they view ‘unexpected’ evidence when they do find it.

The discovery of hadrosaur (duck-billed dinosaur) skin near Grande Prairie, Alberta, Canada, is a classic example. University of Regina researcher Mauricio Barbi recounts: “As we excavated the fossil, I thought we were looking at a skin impression. Then I noticed a piece came off and I realized this is not ordinary—this is real skin. Everyone involved with the excavation was incredibly excited ….”2

Their excitement is understandable. Everybody is taught that dinosaurs became extinct millions of years ago yet here is a piece of real skin. No wonder they didn’t expect to find it, and initially thought it must have been only a skin impression. The basic question arising from the discovery ought now to have been, “Why is it that we’ve been taught these fossils are millions of years old, when here quite plainly is evidence to the contrary?”

Instead, Mauricio Barbi and colleagues are trying to answer their question: “how the fossil remained intact for around 70 million years.”

They plan to use the Canadian Light Source (CLS) synchrotron to look at melanosomes—the cellular organelles that contain pigments that control the colour of an animal’s skin.

Mauricio Barbi and colleagues are trying to answer their question: ‘how the fossil remained intact for around 70 million years.’

“If we are able to observe the melanosomes and their shape, it will be the first time pigments have been identified in the skin of a dinosaur,” said Barbi. That will determine if the hadrosaur skin was green or grey like most dinosaurs are currently portrayed, or a completely different colour.

CLS scientist Tim May is also amazed: “It is astonishing that we can get information like this from such an old sample.”

And Barbi further mused: “What’s not clear is what happened to this dinosaur and how it died. There is something special about this fossil and the area where it was found, and I am going to find out what it is.”3

If only these researchers could look at the world’s geological and fossil evidence through the biblical framework of a 6,000-years-ago Creation and 4,500-years-ago Flood timeline, they would be way less incredulous.

Dino skin “glossy and black, unlike anything I had ever seen in the field before”

Flickr/CLS Research Office (CC BY-SA 2.0)

The photo at left shows part of the hadrosaur skin sample found in a remote area of northwestern Alberta known as the Wapiti formation. It was found by paleontologist Philip Bell, who trawls the dry riverbeds there every summer, looking to see if the spring runoff has exposed any fossils.

Sure enough, in June 2012 he and his team came upon a cliff that had collapsed, revealing dinosaur remains. “I first picked up a bit with skin impressions, and I thought, great, there should be more in there,” he said. “We immediately changed our approach to make sure everything was kept in pristine condition. Soon, we hit upon a section of skin that was glossy and black, unlike anything I had ever seen in the field before. We looked at it closely, and realized that it had a three-dimensional structure.”4

Now, does Dr Bell consider that the standard textbook slow-and-gradual processes were at work to preserve this skin so exquisitely? Despite believing in millions-of-years and evolution, he says: “Obviously skin is something that decays rapidly, so the fossilization must have been incredibly fast.”

For some enlightening material on how such fast fossilization could occur, Dr Bell would do well to read our articles Deluge disaster and Dinosaur herd buried in Noah’s Flood in Inner Mongolia.



Around the Network

BOOO.. I want to find Alien's or Jesus.



finding intact skin does not contradict 70m year timeline.



What. Did. I. Just. Read.

No, I'm not talking about the fact that they found dinosaur skin, I'm talking about the article.



What the hell did I just read?



Around the Network

I'm only impressed if it was a dinosaur foreskin.



Zkuq said:
What. Did. I. Just. Read.

No, I'm not talking about the fact that they found dinosaur skin, I'm talking about the article.

Bwah.  Same reaction.

 



A for effort, article!



 Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."                               

lol, typical religious zealotry misrepresenting facts in a way that lets them hypnotize their masses. Here's a more accurate article on the find.
http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2007/12/dino_mummy

The skin is NOT intact. Mineralizing means "turning into rock". So yes, the fossil STILL turned into rock. The problem is that it turned into rock faster than it could decay. It is still ~70m years old.

EDIT: Oh and regarding the NOAHS FLOOD hypothesis (no, really they went there), Noah is a F*****ng failure for not bringing aboard the dinosaurs. He didn't get a single one.



Shitty source, 0/10 would read again. The lengths some people go to defend their blatantly false opinions...