By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Who do you think is the most recognizable video game character?

 

Who's more recognizable?

Mario 553 82.78%
 
Luigi 2 0.30%
 
Pac-Man 65 9.73%
 
Sonic 9 1.35%
 
Crash 5 0.75%
 
Spyro 1 0.15%
 
Snake 11 1.65%
 
Other 22 3.29%
 
Total:668
RenCutypoison said:


You're probably right. But we will have this conversation again in twenty years =p


Haha, yeah, and I am sure there will be some other brand in the mix by then.  This is just one of the topics that can't be truly quantified because a lot of it is based on assumptions and generalizations (even polls are essentially scientific generalizations because not everyone on this planet can be asked who they recognize and there's always some margin of error).  So I guess there's no way of knowing who's right, but it's always fun to debate reasoning for why we believe what we do :)



Around the Network
danasider said:
RenCutypoison said:


You're probably right. But we will have this conversation again in twenty years =p


Haha, yeah, and I am sure there will be some other brand in the mix by then.  This is just one of the topics that can't be truly quantified because a lot of it is based on assumptions and generalizations (even polls are essentially scientific generalizations because not everyone on this planet can be asked who they recognize and there's always some margin of error).  So I guess there's no way of knowing who's right, but it's always fun to debate reasoning for why we believe what we do :)

Thanks for the fairplay, it's probably the first debate i ever had on a forum that ended well xD



RenCutypoison said:
Multimedialover said:
Hold on:

I hate polls that have stupid choices. Like Snake. Reallllllyyyyy???????????????

MGS 1 = 6.03m
MGS2 = 6.05m
MGS3 = 4.23m
MGS4 = 5.79m

Sales of main series Snake games.

Contrary left out of OP is Masterchief. Who clearly deserves that list more than Snake.

Halo Reach = 9.44m
Halo 1 = 8.60m
Halo 2 = 8.49m
Halo 3 = 11.78m
Halo 4 = 8.41m


MasterChief is still too young 

But argueably more recognised by mainstream and gamers of all ages.



Multimedialover said:
RenCutypoison said:
Multimedialover said:
Hold on:

I hate polls that have stupid choices. Like Snake. Reallllllyyyyy???????????????

MGS 1 = 6.03m
MGS2 = 6.05m
MGS3 = 4.23m
MGS4 = 5.79m

Sales of main series Snake games.

Contrary left out of OP is Masterchief. Who clearly deserves that list more than Snake.

Halo Reach = 9.44m
Halo 1 = 8.60m
Halo 2 = 8.49m
Halo 3 = 11.78m
Halo 4 = 8.41m


MasterChief is still too young 

But argueably more recognised by mainstream and gamers of all ages.

Metal Gear innovated, where Halo just perfected. I don't it's a bad game, but once the licence will be gone people will remember it less than Metal Gear, in my opinion.

And again, a 10 years old licence is just known by 30 years old non gamer at most.



RenCutypoison said:
Multimedialover said:
RenCutypoison said:
Multimedialover said:
Hold on:

I hate polls that have stupid choices. Like Snake. Reallllllyyyyy???????????????

MGS 1 = 6.03m
MGS2 = 6.05m
MGS3 = 4.23m
MGS4 = 5.79m

Sales of main series Snake games.

Contrary left out of OP is Masterchief. Who clearly deserves that list more than Snake.

Halo Reach = 9.44m
Halo 1 = 8.60m
Halo 2 = 8.49m
Halo 3 = 11.78m
Halo 4 = 8.41m


MasterChief is still too young 

But argueably more recognised by mainstream and gamers of all ages.

Metal Gear innovated, where Halo just perfected. I don't it's a bad game, but once the licence will be gone people will remember it less than Metal Gear, in my opinion.

And again, a 10 years old licence is just known by 30 years old non gamer at most.

I dont see the logic you are using.

This thread is about iconic characters not innovation.

 Masterchief, Sonic, to name a few all have much more reason to be in the list. 

Halo is the star wars of videogames. Its got a cult following thats growing. Halo 4 has sold more in its lifetime so far than any previous halo title. And is still tracking higher.



Around the Network

I think Jesus must have been in a videogame a few times so i will vote for him. Untill a Justin Bieber videogame gets released that is.



AnthonyW86 said:

I think Jesus must have been in a videogame a few times so i will vote for him. Untill a Justin Bieber videogame gets released that is.


A Generic God has been in a videogame before.  Automatic win.



Multimedialover said:
RenCutypoison said:

Metal Gear innovated, where Halo just perfected. I don't it's a bad game, but once the licence will be gone people will remember it less than Metal Gear, in my opinion.

And again, a 10 years old licence is just known by 30 years old non gamer at most.

I dont see the logic you are using.

This thread is about iconic characters not innovation.

 Masterchief, Sonic, to name a few all have much more reason to be in the list. 

Halo is the star wars of videogames. Its got a cult following thats growing. Halo 4 has sold more in its lifetime so far than any previous halo title. And is still tracking higher.

Sonic is on the list, and again, it's new.

Older people are just discovering the existence of smartphones now you know. 



It's easily angry birds.
Mario is next.
Probably sonic after that.



Vetteman94 said:
TheBlackNaruto said:


I have seen your replies and I can see where you are coming from and THIS is the ONLY post that I seem to have a issue with.

Only because you say Pac-man is the most recognizable character.

But in this post you say that you feel that Pikachu is more recognized than even Mario due to Mario not being as relevant as Pikachu is now. Yet Pacman really hasn't been "relevant" in like over 20 or 30 years. I guess I am confused because you say Mario is not as relevant as he was 10 years ago and has been surpassed by Pikachu so that makes Pikachu more recognizable. Yet Pacman is who has not been relevant in over 20 years is more recognizable than both. It is like you are contradicting yourself here.

Other than that good points!

That is true that Pac Man hasnt been very relevant for years, but its not like he hasnt dissappeared either,  he still has games that come out on a regular basis. And he still has many pop culture references like other video games, books, movies. etc., I believe he even appeared in the movie Wreck It Ralph,  Hell Pacman even got a Google Home Page dedication to it, there were even companies that complained there was drops in productivity due to this.  Just taking into account the number of people who use Google on a daily basis they would have seen him.  

Because of that and because I believe Pokemon is turning into the defacto game for kids under 13, thats why I think its still Pacman. And I thought the Poll essentailly proved that. I know its anecdotal,  but both my neices (10 and 8) have a Wii and a DS, neither of them have a Mario game, because all they want to play is Wii Sports and Pokemon. I just feel its a similar trend as the reason they play it is because their friends play it.  Which is the reason my generation played Mario, because our friends played it.    But we knew who Pacman was because he was a staple at every Arcade in the world and still is.  They still hold World Championships for Pac Man on a regular basis. 


Okay that is true and I can respect that answer. That part had just confused me because what you said had worked more against you than for you that's all. But again even if I think it is Mario more so I still understand exactly where you are coming from and see what you mean.



The absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence...

PSN: StlUzumaki23