it is kind of messed up that they charge the same price, but whatcha gonna do
anyone wonder why they cant do it.
So, what do you think? | |||
| Damn, not again! | 70 | 40.00% | |
| lol | 30 | 17.14% | |
| Maybe could be fine | 9 | 5.14% | |
| a Ok! | 10 | 5.71% | |
| Sure, why not! | 13 | 7.43% | |
| sucks | 17 | 9.71% | |
| Breaking Bad is awesome! | 26 | 14.86% | |
| Total: | 175 | ||
it is kind of messed up that they charge the same price, but whatcha gonna do
anyone wonder why they cant do it.


Unprecedented support!
new company name : Ubisoft
| oniyide said: it is kind of messed up that they charge the same price, but whatcha gonna do anyone wonder why they cant do it. |
it would require lotsa moneyz to adapt splitscreen multiplayer to a second screen or to allow separate screens. As much as it pains me to say it, the exclusivity of a touchscreen feature appears to be hindering 3rd party support.
![]()
Well.... I unfortunately wont be able to pay full price. I mean seriously why would I pay the same for something that has less content ?
I think they dont understand Nintendo gamers at all they are one of the most value/price oriented buyers you can find. (not talking about shovelware buyers)
Just another game that will be used for the "NO GAMES SELL ON NINTENDO CONSOLES" excuse

oniyide said:
you know whats funny, i thought of you when I saw the thread. Didnt we talk about how they would either devs would have to gimp the MP (espcially local) if they wanted to really utilize the pad? Or they would not utilize the pad in order for the MP not to be and imbalanced mess? |
yulp! I will not underestimate your good judgement next time. If ubisoft had done blacklist's MP like activision's black ops 2 MP It'd been fine imo. That's not too much to ask is it?
![]()
From the launch titles we learnt that duplicating the screen on the Gamepad takes 10 lines of code. Changing the splitcreen to full screen on both the TV and Gamepad would require; what, 2-3 days? Porting the mode itself could be the time consuming part, but they've already done that for the main game.
Don't really care. The game was never on my radar, and neither are any of Ubisoft's future titles. The only current third party game that could be interesting for me is Sonic, and I didn't even enjoy playing its predecessor on the Wii.
PS: BB is awesome :)
How hard is it for 3rd parties to make the Wii U version of their game the same as the other consoles? It's not hard really.
Xbox Series, PS5 and Switch (+ Many Retro Consoles)
'When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called the people's stick'- Mikhail Bakunin
Prediction: Switch 2 will outsell the PS5 by 2030
| the2real4mafol said: How hard is it for 3rd parties to make the Wii U version of their game the same as the other consoles? It's not hard really. |
They seem to labor under the delusion that Nintendo gamers are somehow happy to be treated like crap.
curl-6 said:
They seem to labor under the delusion that Nintendo gamers are somehow happy to be treated like crap. |
It's like a vicious cycle.
1. Release Crappy/ half arsed game missing features
2. Nintendo gamers ignore it and multi-console gamers buy it on a different platform
3. developers complain that it don't sell and don't support Nintendo again in most cases, despite it being their own fault that the game flopped
And so on. It's a shame really.
Xbox Series, PS5 and Switch (+ Many Retro Consoles)
'When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called the people's stick'- Mikhail Bakunin
Prediction: Switch 2 will outsell the PS5 by 2030
The game wasn't going to sell anyway, on all platforms.