By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Argument from nonbelief

 

Do you agree with it?

Yes 17 34.00%
 
No 33 66.00%
 
Total:50
gooch_destroyer on 24 July 2013
Soleron said:
gooch_destroyer said:
...



Who's to say there isn't?

There's no evidence for it.


There's none against it either.



Around the Network
Jay520 on 24 July 2013
Soleron said:

Any thread like this, whatever your purpose, gets out of hand quite fast.

fwiw your logic is sound and the definition of perfectly loving is what's up for debate.


I'll keep the thread "in hand".

What does "fwiw" mean?



Anfebious on 24 July 2013
Nem said:
Anfebious said:
 


Logic isn't a biology subject. 

I think they follow logic. They follow their own logic (even if that seems illogical to you). All humans pursue their desires.


Fine, math then. Though Biology does follow logic aswell, but for the sake of simplifying the argment lets go with math.

You make it sound like i said they are the only ones that do it. But, not believing in religion is not a desire, its a product of logic. It has been disproven time and again for anyone who wishes to see it, so only the desire to believe it can drive this logic you say they follow. Wich is unlogical because it has a base on desire.

They believe because they want to. Wether its true or likely doesnt seem to matter, because this desire makes them want to believe in it, whatever it is.

It was proven that god doesn't exist? Show me please! 



"I've Underestimated the Horse Power from Mario Kart 8, I'll Never Doubt the WiiU's Engine Again"

Soleron on 24 July 2013
gooch_destroyer said:
Soleron said:
gooch_destroyer said:
...



Who's to say there isn't?

There's no evidence for it.


There's none against it either.

OK, but without knowing what that purpose is due to lack of evidence, you are de facto in a state of there not being one.

What do you believe is the purpose then?



Jay520 on 24 July 2013
gooch_destroyer said:


There's none against it either.


Do you believe we should believe in every claim simply because they are possible (even absurd and contradictory claims)?

Or should we believe in things that we have a reason to believe?



Around the Network
Soleron on 24 July 2013
Anfebious said:
...


Fine, math then. Though Biology does follow logic aswell, but for the sake of simplifying the argment lets go with math.

You make it sound like i said they are the only ones that do it. But, not believing in religion is not a desire, its a product of logic. It has been disproven time and again for anyone who wishes to see it, so only the desire to believe it can drive this logic you say they follow. Wich is unlogical because it has a base on desire.

They believe because they want to. Wether its true or likely doesnt seem to matter, because this desire makes them want to believe in it, whatever it is.

It was proven that god doesn't exist? Show me please! 

Continuous disproof is not the same thing as proof of the negative. Basic philosophy. What he's saying is that religious claims have been tested repeatedly and found to be false or untestable.



gooch_destroyer on 24 July 2013
Jay520 said:
gooch_destroyer said:


There's none against it either.


Do you believe we should believe in every claim simply because they are possible (even absurd and contradictory claims)?

Or should we believe in things that we have a reason to believe?


Just saying we shouldn't rule out everything.



Nem on 24 July 2013
Anfebious said:

It was proven that god doesn't exist? Show me please! 

I know were gonna walk in circles here, but it follows the same logic as this: Flying pigs dont exist? Show me please!



Carl on 24 July 2013

A perfectly loving God does exist.

I mean, God is so great. He loves us all. Why else would he give newborn babies AIDS in Africa?



                            

gooch_destroyer on 24 July 2013
Soleron said:
gooch_destroyer said:
Soleron said:
gooch_destroyer said:
...



Who's to say there isn't?

There's no evidence for it.


There's none against it either.

OK, but without knowing what that purpose is due to lack of evidence, you are de facto in a state of there not being one.

What do you believe is the purpose then?


i don't know man. sometimes I don't know why us humans are here. let me ask a silly question: what if you created some living lifeforms, are their GOD?