By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - Are Christian American Extremist the reason it took Same sex marriage so long to be legalized in the U.S?

Screamapillar said:
The majority of the world's population is still opposed to the idea of same sex couples marrying. It ceases procreation. Those couples who are in that relationship could only ever hope to have others' children. It is just a fact. Argue with me and tell me I'm "homophobic" or "bigoted" all you want. Male and female sexes exist for a reason. Both are needed to continue our species. It's why we're here in the first place.

There are certain westernized countries, such as UK or the US, that seem to be moving in the direction of "anything goes", but for the most part, the rest of the world looks at what we're doing in our bubble and think we're all a bunch of crazies.


Riiiight... Just because same-sex marriage isn't allowed, doesn't mean that all the gays and lesbians will suddenly turn straight and start making babies.
Unfortunatly it just simply does not work like that, gays and lesbians have and will always exist regardless of what some book says and not just in the human populace either.

Besides, who *really* has the right to tell someone who they can and can't have sex with? We are all consenting adults (I hope anyway!), it should be our own decision, not the governments or religion or some random dude staring at you from a corner, those who think otherwise... Might aswell move to a country that doesn't have any freedoms.




www.youtube.com/@Pemalite

Around the Network
scat398 said:

Its not apropriate to label it radical either, it is far from it.  It is an opinion that has been around for a long time and has proven well to society.

Now as I stated I personally I think gay marriage can be a good thing for marriage, and frankly good for the gay community as well.  But, like any normal conservative I like to see results and I am cautious in my nature, something my liberal friends loathe but could certainly stand to learn from.

Well, blood letting is a long practiced tradition too.

I am still bewildered why the conservatives aren't the leaders in the same sex marraige movement - well they are in some places, but haven't been in the USA.



 

Really not sure I see any point of Consol over PC's since Kinect, Wii and other alternative ways to play have been abandoned. 

Top 50 'most fun' game list coming soon!

 

Tell me a funny joke!

NolSinkler said:
Lots of people care. Just because your view is now politically dominant does not make those people who hold that homosexuality is abhorrent 'extremists', especially as it is the majority view worldwide and has been the only viewpoint for much of recorded history. The liberal elite in our society have taken the word 'extremist' and redefined it as anything standing in the way of their dismantling the fundamental structures upon which our society is built.


Slavery was a fundamental structure of our society. Women not having the same rights as men was a fundamental structure. Imperialism was a fundamental structure. We frown upon all of those things now. Because we progress. I get so annoyed when people try and fall back and say "they're trying to change our tradition" when your tradition is pretty crappy, when you look in hindsight

highmen said:

just kill all those fags....we dont need them on this earth...there is only a man and a woman no other gender eal with it....

Did I actually just read that?

Wow.



Yes. Same sex marriage is allowed only in certain states.



Around the Network
Egann said:

I know an ex-deacon who's about as far to the right on this issue as one can reasonably get, and I asked him his opinion, and after several moments of thought he said the following:

"I have no problem with homosexuals having hospital visitation rights, inheritances, tax statuses filing jointly, or any of the other cultural subsidies marriage receives. I just don't think the word marriage should be involved. Marriage is a sacred institution which predates all our modern governments, therefore governments don't have authority over it."

Note the phrase "cultural subsidies." He thought through the situation, acknowledged it was unfair, but also found the phrase "civil right" to be misleading because applying it here is technically inaccurate. Educated religious people can be very precise with their language, and that's not always a bad thing. He also drew a clear line on what's an acceptable compromise and what isn't, Even if you don't agree with the bottom line, you must admit this opinion is more cogent and carefully thought through than 95% of the liberal opinions floating around out there.


Personal opinion: politicians get reelected based on divisiveness. It's in their best interest for problems to exist because then they can demonize the other party and keep a loyal following themselves. The Achilles heel of democracy is that the only people who will voluntarily run for public office are the ones who should stay far away from it, because they're the ones who get drunk on power and want to maintain it. Actually resolving a problem while it is still politically useful is not in their best interest, either personally or as a party. That's the real reason gay rights has been so long-winded an issue.

"Marriage is a sacred institution which predates all our modern governments, therefore governments don't have authority over it."  Ignoring the fact that marriage was crated by governments before Churches incorporated it, If we go by that thinking then so are cars - so the government has no authority over helicopters (1500's Leonardo da Vinci), ships and boats, doctors, herbalist, etc.

Well, the good news it stops all of their attempts to limit abort rights.

Well, ask him about interracial marriages - also forbidden - and see how he explains that one.  For him not to see it as a civil rights issue shows there is something missing somewhere in his thinking.  I guess his bias is showing.



 

Really not sure I see any point of Consol over PC's since Kinect, Wii and other alternative ways to play have been abandoned. 

Top 50 'most fun' game list coming soon!

 

Tell me a funny joke!

It's not just extremists. The average traditional Christian doesn't like same-sex marriage.



Currently playing:

Bloodbath Paddy Wagon Ultra 9

axumblade said:

I've always heard marriage was a tradition that Christians took from Pagan religions in an attempt to convert Pagans to Christianity. This could very well be wrong though considering my source wasn't exactly an unbias party and it was used in an argument on why she didn't like most Christians...x.o


Well, I'm not sure if the Christians took "Marriage" from the pagans or not, but Marriage as in the idea of it (I.E. Forever together.) does date back to the old world, long before Christianity, where two tribes would contractually marry two people to ally both tribes.

This was before the Dark Ages, The Crusades, The Roman empire and the rise of Christianity, possibly before religions ever even existed.





www.youtube.com/@Pemalite

Here in the Philippines, the Catholic Bishops of the Philippines has strong political clout over our Government, Justice system and less fortunate people. That we can't even pass a Health bill because it promotes contraceptives and condoms and has a section that allows abortion, if the mother's life is in danger and the child inside her cannot be saved.

To the Religious zealots, its just abortion plain in simple with disregards to the mothers' life and they do not care if we are over populated and a child grows in poverty, as long as contraceptives and condoms is not used because they prevent life.

Pro-Life here = you just need to be given birth to, without a care to your standard of living.

We also have a study that the Philippines is the number 1 country with teen prenancies and illegal abortion in South East Asia because there is no proper sex education and also we have a high death rate of mothers while giving birth because a lot of our hospitals have no proper equipment to deal with complications that may occur during child labor and the funding is in the same bill.

Which is indefinitely stuck in the Supreme Court as they study if its legal under the constitution after 14 or so years of waiting in the Senate and Congress.

And if we cannot get this bill passed then there is no hope in passing Human Rights for LGBTs and the Divorce Law. So if you think its bad in America, you have not seen the Philippines yet and what the Church is doing to this country.



Pemalite said:
axumblade said:

I've always heard marriage was a tradition that Christians took from Pagan religions in an attempt to convert Pagans to Christianity. This could very well be wrong though considering my source wasn't exactly an unbias party and it was used in an argument on why she didn't like most Christians...x.o


Well, I'm not sure if the Christians took "Marriage" from the pagans or not, but Marriage as in the idea of it (I.E. Forever together.) does date back to the old world, long before Christianity, where two tribes would contractually marry two people to ally both tribes.

This was before the Dark Ages, The Crusades, The Roman empire and the rise of Christianity, possibly before religions ever even existed.



Correct. Also, in those days homosexuals were in less of a position. Homosexuals have more position today even in the time of the Greeks and Romans. That is true progression and no one should stand in the way of their need to get married to their love.