Not surprised. Quality can come from anywhere, try to keep that in mind in the future.

free to play games tend to not be of the same quality as AAA retail releases

You don't measure "fun" in budgets and polygon counts

Funny, had the situation been reversed, I don't think this thread would have gone the way it has

Just the words... 'redefine triple a', yuck.

Some F2P can be very high quality indeed. But they are few and far between and the F2P aspect usually means that the value proposition is quite large and wide. So can F2p be AAA, I think the answer is yes.

Can 1 studio make 4 AAA F2P games, well depends on the size of the studio, but not many studios in the world could handle that, so would be interested in finding out how big that studio is.

I call BS. If these were 4 indie PS4 titles somehow I think this thread would turn out differently.

Are you calling me on bullshit or just the general consensus? I hate this type of propaganda no matter who tries to pull it off.

Both. Consensus in general but you too based on your "yuck" comment. The idea is to make premium games that aren't big budget, and you clearly disapprove.

I could easily say the PS agenda of prasing the almighty retail AAA exclusive above all else is propaganda to bring news like this downward.

What...?

@bolded - quite an interpretation of my post you make...

You don't get my response and still try to pin me into your '2-camps' console bashing?

Again, the phrasing 'redefining aaa titles' is a bullshit phrase that's so full of bragging that i disapprove of THAT sentence. Not about the article, nothing about the games, nothing about Microsoft, Sony or Nintendo or whatever company involved... I don't like people that act big and use big words to get some attention or to push a point.  That's all.