By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Microsoft Lift London has four new games in the works, will "redefine triple-A"

-_- I dont like free to play, they are normally pay to win.....If the paying is just for cosmetics then thats alright.



Around the Network

lol yeah and why not give away free consoles and free internet connection..... there is no way a game can be really viable on the mass market being truly F2W.... why not give away any game for free then and just pay skins if it was doable...



Necromunda said:
tres said:
OttoniBastos said:

Last time, they said: "We will kill Sony at E3".

Well,we know what happened.


well sony won with cheap shots.  if it was just about games microsoft showed nothing but games.  and i dont care if people navigate to their corner on this it is what it is.  sony no drm was a kick to the nuts and then $399 was akin to kicking them when theyre down.  so really your position is nothing to be jovial about.  if ms wouldve said no drm and the price wouldve been close to the same sonys e3 wouldve just been the lackluster event that it was.

Considering that didn't happen, what's your point exactly? And Microsofts game lineup was hardly massive enough to "kill" Sony regardless. Hell, half the exclusives that Microsoft announced, that I'm even interested in, are simply console exclusive to the Xbone and I'll be picking them up for the PC. 


um what didnt happen?

1) microsoft showed nothing but games - TRUE

2) sony no drm kick microsoft in the nuts  - TRUE

3) $399 was a kick to the head of microsoft - TRUE

theres nothing else in my statement

cheap shot?  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOwA46785pk

sony lackluster e3?  it really was.  

ps.  im getting both consoles xbox one day one since killer instinct & forza well are killer instinct and forza.  ps4 whenever naughty dog releases a game or maybe earlier the order might get me interested.



tres said:
Necromunda said:
tres said:
OttoniBastos said:

Last time, they said: "We will kill Sony at E3".

Well,we know what happened.


well sony won with cheap shots.  if it was just about games microsoft showed nothing but games.  and i dont care if people navigate to their corner on this it is what it is.  sony no drm was a kick to the nuts and then $399 was akin to kicking them when theyre down.  so really your position is nothing to be jovial about.  if ms wouldve said no drm and the price wouldve been close to the same sonys e3 wouldve just been the lackluster event that it was.

Considering that didn't happen, what's your point exactly? And Microsofts game lineup was hardly massive enough to "kill" Sony regardless. Hell, half the exclusives that Microsoft announced, that I'm even interested in, are simply console exclusive to the Xbone and I'll be picking them up for the PC. 


um what didnt happen?

1) microsoft showed nothing but games - TRUE

2) sony no drm kick microsoft in the nuts  - TRUE

3) $399 was a kick to the head of microsoft - TRUE

theres nothing else in my statement

cheap shot?  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOwA46785pk

sony lackluster e3?  it really was.  

ps.  im getting both consoles xbox one day one since killer instinct & forza well are killer instinct and forza.  ps4 whenever naughty dog releases a game or maybe earlier the order might get me interested.


1.) Sony also showed plenty of games, but didn't blow their load prematurely, as they will show plenty of new games at both Gamescom and TGS and thus most likely overshadow Microsoft at each.

2.) Sony responded brilliantly, they came out and stated their plans for DRM directly, while Microsoft was being extremely iffy and indirect regarding any statements on their DRM. Any company would have done the same thing, it was the perfect PR move at the time.

3.) You are honestly faulting Sony for having the more powerful console and undercutting the Xbones price by $100? Once again, brilliant move that it turned out the way it did. The pricing more than likely had nothing to do with the Xbone directly though, they just didn't want to make the same mistake they did with the PS3.

Also, that "cheap shot" was a last second thing that they did for fun, they literally recorded that at E3 the same day I believe.

Sony's E3 wasn't lackluster, they clearly showed they were about the games, the gamers, just look at the overwhelming indie support that people so quickly seem to forget. They gave a clear message with where they were going forward with the console while Microsoft has been teeter-tottering ever since.



I hate f2p. I feel raped without knowing it.
And it was lackluster (my opinion).



Ex Graphics Whore.

Around the Network
OttoniBastos said:

Last time, they said: "We will kill Sony at E3".

Well,we know what happened.

They did, arguably, in games. Sony killed, in polocies.



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

zhao3gold said:
Hi MS, I prefer to have 4 new AAA retail games rather than 4 F2P games. Please be understood!!!!!

Then buy PS4. Their culture is all about retail.

Xbox gamers like a high metascore and dont prejudice based on its file size.



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

was excited until I read "four new free-to-play games"..



AAA definition is changing.........its like AAA beef at a market. It refers to quality.

If we get 80's metas for 4 Xbox games, even if they span across, tablet and phone, then Im all for it. Its just more quality the competition doesnt have.



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

sniper989 said:
was excited until I read "four new free-to-play games"..


i like what killer instinct is doing.  its more here you can play the whole game with jago, buy the other character you like or buy the whole game.  spartacus legends is the pisser.  once you lose your toughest characters because a crash then you revive them until you cant revive them anymore without gold.