well that's the thing I'm still not over it.... but yeah I'll let it go if it's that big of deal.... it's not like that thread hasn't been pretty much exhausted on every possibility.... we just have to wait and see....
well that's the thing I'm still not over it.... but yeah I'll let it go if it's that big of deal.... it's not like that thread hasn't been pretty much exhausted on every possibility.... we just have to wait and see....
AnthonyW86 said:
An HD 6450 is a really bad example, in terms of raw processing power it's comparable to the PS360. It also features a really limiting 64-bit bus. But even with lower-end cards there is definitely a difference between ddr3 and gddr5, take the HD 6670 for example: Or a GT 440 1gb DDR3 vs a GT 440 512mb GDDR5, even with half the memory the GDDR5 is alway's faster: http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/GeForce-GT-440-512-MB-GDDR5-vs-1-GB-DDR3-Video-Card-Review/1272/6 |
Did you not read my post?
You're just confirming my points.
--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--
Hynad said:
A naive attempt to set a trap? By the fans? Are you serious? |
Well, making the imagination run quite wildly. But if such rumour started from just one person and then spread on the net, then almost every hypothesis could be not totally unlikely.
Always supposing the rumour is false, another hypothesis, maybe less unlikely, could be fans trying to force MS to increase RAM.
In both cases, and also in almost all the other possible hypotheses, whatever the reason for which the rumour started, each one helping spreading it could have a different reason.
I really can't see this happening the production specs have to have already been ordered.