By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - What I like so far about Smash 4

chriscox1121 said:
Weedlab said:


Wow! I hope that is rectified. It sounds like how Kirby was downgraded from Smash 64 into Melee.

Kirby was good in brawl.  Not top tier but really close if I remember right


I never tried him in Brawl since I had limited time with the game, but I'll pick it up when I get my Wii U since it is BC. I keep hearing mixed to negative things about the game. I’ll give it a go before Smash Wii U drops. . But Kirby was almost unstoppable in Smash 64. Then he was seriously downgraded in Melee.

 



 

Playstation = The Beast from the East

Sony + Nintendo = WIN! PS3 + PSV + PS4 + Wii U + 3DS


Around the Network
DucksUnlimited said:
I agree with everything except Bowser. He just seems far too agile to me. Doesn't really fit. I wish they had found a way to make him better without giving him crazy flip kicks and shit.

    I don't know. You may be right, but you can't really say Bowser was good in Melee or Brawl. Specially Melee. Melee was a very fast game and Bowser simply didn't belong in that game.



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

I am SO glad tripping was removed. When I first played brawl over my friend's house I couldn't believe such a mechanic was introduced. All is fair in Smash Bros. but tripping is random and can cost you a match.

I also agree that Bowser looks perfected now. He looks how I always wanted him to look.

Once again I agree on Megaman. Having 3 platforming legends, Mario, Sonic, and Mega Man in the same game is just awesome. I know how sakurai feels by not adding in non-nintendo properties all willy-nilly but Mega Man was a no brainer and I think Sakurai knew it and couldn't evade it. Until I knew how to comprehend 3rd party companies I always thought Megaman was just... Nintendo.

As long as either one of these third parties is included: Knuckles, Goku, or Lloyd Irving I'll be okay.



AZWification said:
DucksUnlimited said:
I agree with everything except Bowser. He just seems far too agile to me. Doesn't really fit. I wish they had found a way to make him better without giving him crazy flip kicks and shit.

    I don't know. You may be right, but you can't really say Bowser was good in Melee or Brawl. Specially Melee. Melee was a very fast game and Bowser simply didn't belong in that game.


Wait, I have to address this now. This must be my mind playing tricks on me but am I the only one who thought that Melee was slower than Brawl? The first time I played Brawl, I thought I couldn't control the characters all that well. But then again it had been about 4 years since I played Melee since some robbers broke into our house and stole every game to my name and left an Atari Flashback! I'll have to go on youtube and compare the two.



Ljink96 said:
I am SO glad tripping was removed. When I first played brawl over my friend's house I couldn't believe such a mechanic was introduced. All is fair in Smash Bros. but tripping is random and can cost you a match.

I also agree that Bowser looks perfected now. He looks how I always wanted him to look.

Once again I agree on Megaman. Having 3 platforming legends, Mario, Sonic, and Mega Man in the same game is just awesome. I know how sakurai feels by not adding in non-nintendo properties all willy-nilly but Mega Man was a no brainer and I think Sakurai knew it and couldn't evade it. Until I knew how to comprehend 3rd party companies I always thought Megaman was just... Nintendo.

As long as either one of these third parties is included: Knuckles, Goku, or Lloyd Irving I'll be okay.

             There is a video on YT showing a ton of reactions to Mega Man being in Smash 4. Priceless. XD



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---