Bofferbrauer2 said:
Greg Salazar has a nice video about the prices of those cards: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrzgZaonmTc In short, he was relieved that the prices were not the "Doom and Gloom" $2000+ he was fearing, but he still knows that objectively speaking, they are far too expensive and it's a big price hike over last gen even just by going with the 12GB as a benchmark. On a related note, I wonder what price the 4080Ti and 4090Ti will get next year, because I'm sure NVidia will launch those too later on. If AMD is competitive in performance (which I expect, at least in rasterization; in Raytracing I expect somewhat better than Ampere but can't keep up with Ada) and keeps the 7800 cards under $800, then is see absolutely no reason to buy a 4080 unless the price drops a good $200. Want more power than those? Get a 4090 if you can afford one, but stay the hell out of the 4080 cards. |
Personally, even if RDNA 3 cards ends up being terrible, I still wouldn't recommend people getting the 4080. There's just too much of a price increase for what people are getting. I think a lot of people will be happy getting 3080 12GB or 3080 Ti for $500-$600 and sticking it out for 5000 series or 6000 series. Cause unless the reviews say otherwise, the 4080 12GB is slightly slower than a 3090 Ti for $900. A 3080 Ti is within 5-10% of the 3090 Ti.
So overall, unless you are getting a 4090 or waiting for RDNA 3, buy Ampere or RDNA 2 and spend the money you saved on hookers or something.
PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850