HoloDust said:
|
Right. I meant to say it will beat both memory bandwidth wise.
HoloDust said:
|
Right. I meant to say it will beat both memory bandwidth wise.
| disolitude said: My OP is fine and correct, but its ok. |
Just a few minutes ago, I wrote a lengthy post explaining some of the wrong assumptions you make. Pretty much every other point you made in your post is also false.
If you want to learn why the gddr5 memory in the PS4 produces LESS heat than the ddr3/esram, and why designing a mb with gddr5 ram is easier (and hence probably cheaper) than one with ddr3, I suggest you download the data sheets from hynix/samsung and read through them. I don't hink I should waste my time writing another article explainig it to you because you seem to simply ignore what people write if it doesn't repeat what you _think_ you know (and yes, I am right and you are wrong)
| disolitude said: Too many posts in here with incorrect information for me to reply to. Information exchange on VGchartz is severely broken. People just push their console agenda and read what they want to read. I don't know why I bother to be honest... |
Honestly I don't buy your GPU side of the APU is less powerful so there is no need for faster RAM.
Past AMD APUs have (pretty much) all had proformance benifits from faster RAM (specifically A8/A10). There is no reason to think these newer generation ones will be any different. As I said in my first post this is still a wait and see topic because we have yet to gut either of these consoles.
drkohler said:
Just a few minutes ago, I wrote a lengthy post explaining some of the wrong assumptions you make. Pretty much every other point you made in your post is also false. If you want to learn why the gddr5 memory in the PS4 produces LESS heat than the ddr3/esram, and why designing a mb with gddr5 ram is easier (and hence probably cheaper) than one with ddr3, I suggest you download the data sheets from hynix/samsung and read through them. I don't hink I should waste my time writing another article explainig it to you because you seem to simply ignore what people write if it doesn't repeat what you _think_ you know (and yes, I am right and you are wrong) |
Same reply as ethomaz:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6972/xbox-one-hardware-compared-to-playstation-4/3
"There are merits to both approaches. Sony has the most present-day-GPU-centric approach to its memory subsystem: give the GPU a wide and fast GDDR5 interface and call it a day. It’s well understood and simple to manage. The downsides? High speed GDDR5 isn’t the most power efficient, and Sony is now married to a more costly memory technology for the life of the PlayStation 4."
Feel free to post some more personal opinions and theories though.
Seikseruza said:
Past AMD APUs have (pretty much) all had proformance benifits from faster RAM (specifically A8/A10). There is no reason to think these newer generation ones will be any different. As I said in my first post this is still a wait and see topic because we have yet to gut either of these consoles. |
That's because AMD APU's before didn't work like this:

Cleary397 said:
Is that why the launch price is higher? |
The Xbone is bundled with Kinect do you noticed this?
| disolitude said: Everyone knows GDDR5 RAM is more beneficial for GPU memory. System memory however is actually better off with DDR3 RAM due to sligtly lower latency.
In terms of next gen console GPUs, below are the specs: PS4 GPU Cores - 1152 Xbox One GPU Cores - 768 and PS4 Peak Shader Throughput - 1.84 TFLOPS Xbox One Peak Shader Throughput - 1.23 TFLOPS
Xbox One GPU has 33% less cores and 33% less peak shader throughput. Due to this, it needs less video bandwidth than PS4. This leads us to video RAM: PS4 Video Memory Bandwidth - 176 GB/s Xbox One Video Memory Bandwidth ( DDR3 + sRAM cache) - 102 GB/s
Xbox One would not benefit at all from having 176 GB/s GDDR5 bandwidth due to lower GPU throughput. If they gave the Xbox more GPU cores it would be a different story however its RAM bandwidth is perfectly proportional to the GPU performance. Its no secret that Xbox One has a less powerful GPU, but because it skipped on GDDR5 memory it can enjoy better system RAM, much less power consumption and heat, and cheaper manufacturing cost. Just an FYI to those that say Xbox One is at a disadvantage for not having GDDR5 RAM. |
Time to educate:
1) GDDR5 uses less energy and produces less heat. The DDR3 is not "better system RAM." Yes due to lower speeds it has tighter timings, but speed matters much more. Example: My 2133 MHz DDR3 has 50% less tight timings than my old 1600MHz RAM, but it still performs better at EVERYTHING.
2) The 7750 has 512 Cores and runs at 900 MHz compared to the X1's 800 MHz. Before RAM is considered it should be about 30% weaker. Most 7750's use GDDR5, but there are cheap versions that use DDR3. The DDR3 version performs half as well.
RAM feeds the core, and the faster it is -> the faster the core can process. Even with a miniscule amount of SRAM, the system will be majorly bottlenecked. Prepare for a lot of pop in!
Prediction for console Lifetime sales:
Wii:100-120 million, PS3:80-110 million, 360:70-100 million
[Prediction Made 11/5/2009]
3DS: 65m, PSV: 22m, Wii U: 18-22m, PS4: 80-120m, X1: 35-55m
I gauruntee the PS5 comes out after only 5-6 years after the launch of the PS4.
[Prediction Made 6/18/2014]
|
disolitude said: High speed GDDR5 isn’t the most power efficient, and Sony is now married to a more costly memory technology for the life of the PlayStation 4." Feel free to post some more personal opinions and theories though. |
READ THE F*CKJING DATA SHEETS. gddr5 memory takes LESS heat than the ddr3/esram combo. The quote is SIMPLY WRONG because that idiot was too lazy to actually read the data sheets.
READ THE F*CKING DATA SHEETS for god's sake. How many times and how many people have to tell you that?
The cost thing was true upto this time, since gddr5 chips were not used on larger scale up to now. Sony wants to sell >10 million PS4 per year, that alone is >160 million gddr5 chips. >160 million chips for Sony alone. (That is more than ten times the number of cell chips Sony ever ordered in any year).
You should stop trying folks information outside this anandtech article is clearly not relevant to the poster. Everything on the internet is wrong except anandtech and there assumptions.
disolitude said:
Same reply as ethomaz: http://www.anandtech.com/show/6972/xbox-one-hardware-compared-to-playstation-4/3 "There are merits to both approaches. Sony has the most present-day-GPU-centric approach to its memory subsystem: give the GPU a wide and fast GDDR5 interface and call it a day. It’s well understood and simple to manage. The downsides? High speed GDDR5 isn’t the most power efficient, and Sony is now married to a more costly memory technology for the life of the PlayStation 4." Feel free to post some more personal opinions and theories though. |
I don't feel educated enough in this stuff to shoot any argument down about the speed of memory and bandwidth (you bloody geeks ;)
*BUT* a few things that don't sit right with me....
I don't think i have actually seen *any* developer say that the Xbox is a powerful machine... the only comments ive seen is that the Cloud is something that could be useful (and we know all about that).
The bit thats bolded (that i didnt bold but you did)... is false with *ANY* tech that starts to get used more (and GDDR5 if being used more and more now)... the cheaper it gets... so it wont stay costly. That makes me discount that argument straight away.. because if they cannot get that right, then the rest of their argument is surely up for mis-information.
Finally.... we only have spec's for the PS4... Xbox have not released any specs except for 5 billion transistors. There are only two reasons for not releasing specs:
1. They are changing the specs (very very unlikely)
2. The machine isnt as powerful.
That is all :)