|
disolitude said: High speed GDDR5 isn’t the most power efficient, and Sony is now married to a more costly memory technology for the life of the PlayStation 4." Feel free to post some more personal opinions and theories though. |
READ THE F*CKJING DATA SHEETS. gddr5 memory takes LESS heat than the ddr3/esram combo. The quote is SIMPLY WRONG because that idiot was too lazy to actually read the data sheets.
READ THE F*CKING DATA SHEETS for god's sake. How many times and how many people have to tell you that?
The cost thing was true upto this time, since gddr5 chips were not used on larger scale up to now. Sony wants to sell >10 million PS4 per year, that alone is >160 million gddr5 chips. >160 million chips for Sony alone. (That is more than ten times the number of cell chips Sony ever ordered in any year).
