disolitude said:
Same reply as ethomaz: http://www.anandtech.com/show/6972/xbox-one-hardware-compared-to-playstation-4/3 "There are merits to both approaches. Sony has the most present-day-GPU-centric approach to its memory subsystem: give the GPU a wide and fast GDDR5 interface and call it a day. It’s well understood and simple to manage. The downsides? High speed GDDR5 isn’t the most power efficient, and Sony is now married to a more costly memory technology for the life of the PlayStation 4." Feel free to post some more personal opinions and theories though. |
I don't feel educated enough in this stuff to shoot any argument down about the speed of memory and bandwidth (you bloody geeks ;)
*BUT* a few things that don't sit right with me....
I don't think i have actually seen *any* developer say that the Xbox is a powerful machine... the only comments ive seen is that the Cloud is something that could be useful (and we know all about that).
The bit thats bolded (that i didnt bold but you did)... is false with *ANY* tech that starts to get used more (and GDDR5 if being used more and more now)... the cheaper it gets... so it wont stay costly. That makes me discount that argument straight away.. because if they cannot get that right, then the rest of their argument is surely up for mis-information.
Finally.... we only have spec's for the PS4... Xbox have not released any specs except for 5 billion transistors. There are only two reasons for not releasing specs:
1. They are changing the specs (very very unlikely)
2. The machine isnt as powerful.
That is all :)








