By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Could MK8, Bayo2 and X run on a PS3[60]

 

could they?

yes 280 32.52%
 
no 341 39.61%
 
maybe one of them could 124 14.40%
 
maybe two of them could 41 4.76%
 
see results 75 8.71%
 
Total:861
Zero999 said:
HoloDust said:

I see you post from time to time about hardware, and I'm afraid it's too obvious from your posts that you know very little about how stuff works (mistaking 1 core from APU for GPU being obvious pointer to that).

I strongly suggest, for start, to dig through some threads here (Superchunk's comparison thread is, mostly, accurate enough) if you really want to learn a bit or two about PS4/XOne/WiiU.

Oh, and unlike what some people here living in Phantasy Kingdom believe, the gap between them is, unfortunately, really big - but that's what you get when you ditch successful Wii design, and instead of better innards you go for Gamepad.

and here comes the shitstorm again.

Wii u unknown number of GFLOPS but the 500-700 range is a safe bet. if we get the midle option it's like this: Wii u 600 gflops vs Xone 1200 gflops and ps4 1800 gflops. that's with all three sharing the same modern tools and in the diminishing returns era = not a big difference.

Instead of trying to offend me why don't you try countering my arguments with something better than "that's not true because I say so" wich is what you've been doing so far.

 

even fourth storm from neogaf, the person that made the pic of the wiiu gpu possible thinks its 176 gflops, the majority of tech heads with out a biased agenda think its 176 gflops, best case scenerio is 350 gflops.



Around the Network
ninjablade said:
Zero999 said:
HoloDust said:

I see you post from time to time about hardware, and I'm afraid it's too obvious from your posts that you know very little about how stuff works (mistaking 1 core from APU for GPU being obvious pointer to that).

I strongly suggest, for start, to dig through some threads here (Superchunk's comparison thread is, mostly, accurate enough) if you really want to learn a bit or two about PS4/XOne/WiiU.

Oh, and unlike what some people here living in Phantasy Kingdom believe, the gap between them is, unfortunately, really big - but that's what you get when you ditch successful Wii design, and instead of better innards you go for Gamepad.

and here comes the shitstorm again.

Wii u unknown number of GFLOPS but the 500-700 range is a safe bet. if we get the midle option it's like this: Wii u 600 gflops vs Xone 1200 gflops and ps4 1800 gflops. that's with all three sharing the same modern tools and in the diminishing returns era = not a big difference.

Instead of trying to offend me why don't you try countering my arguments with something better than "that's not true because I say so" wich is what you've been doing so far.

 

even fourth storm from neogaf, the person that made the pic of the wiiu gpu possible thinks its 176 gflops, the majority of tech heads with out a biased agenda think its 176 gflops, best case scenerio is 350 gflops.

Coming from you of all people...



ninjablade said:

even fourth storm from neogaf, the person that made the pic of the wiiu gpu possible thinks its 176 gflops, the majority of tech heads with out a biased agenda think its 176 gflops, best case scenerio is 350 gflops.

Lets be honest here.  At 176 GFLOPS, the Wii U would not have ANY better looking ports (NFS:MW) or games like X, Mario Kart, etc.  Saying so just makes you sound like an idiot.

I cannot believe you're 28.  I call BS, because you post like you're 12. 



the thread that keeps giving...



curl-6 said:
cablebox said:
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:
watch dogs is more impressive then all those games so yes

More impressive in what way? That it looks better to you?

bigger world, more beautiful, more things on screen, if you played only wii last gen ofcourse they look impressive but for HD gamers they are nothing special and plenty of games look the same or better

I didn't play Wii only last gen, (Wii + 360) and they all look great to me, especially X.

good for you but that doesn't make them to advance for the current gen hardware

I'd disagree. Wii U has more than twice as much RAM as PS3 and 360, and X and Bayo 2 look like they make use of this with their detailed expansive backdrops.

The edram makes the actual performance of RAM be quite more than "twice the ps360".



Around the Network
g911turbo said:
ninjablade said:

even fourth storm from neogaf, the person that made the pic of the wiiu gpu possible thinks its 176 gflops, the majority of tech heads with out a biased agenda think its 176 gflops, best case scenerio is 350 gflops.

Lets be honest here.  At 176 GFLOPS, the Wii U would not have ANY better looking ports (NFS:MW) or games like X, Mario Kart, etc.  Saying so just makes you sound like an idiot.

I cannot believe you're 28.  I call BS, because you post like you're 12. 


maybe you should go read the tech thread before you go insulting people, if the wiiu has 176 glops they are more effeciant then xenos, and add 512mb of ram, and they would be able to achieve 360 like visuals but these are tech heads saying  that, you know the person that actually payed money to get the wiiu gpu pics and many others as well, i guess there all idiots and your the smart one.



ninjablade said:
g911turbo said:
ninjablade said:

even fourth storm from neogaf, the person that made the pic of the wiiu gpu possible thinks its 176 gflops, the majority of tech heads with out a biased agenda think its 176 gflops, best case scenerio is 350 gflops.

Lets be honest here.  At 176 GFLOPS, the Wii U would not have ANY better looking ports (NFS:MW) or games like X, Mario Kart, etc.  Saying so just makes you sound like an idiot.

I cannot believe you're 28.  I call BS, because you post like you're 12. 


maybe you should go read the tech thread before you go insulting people, if the wiiu has 176 glops they are more effeciant then xenos, and add 512mb of ram, and they would be able to achieve 360 like visuals but these are tech heads saying  that, you know the person that actually payed money to get the wiiu gpu pics and many others as well, i guess there all idiots and your the smart one.

The "tech heads" are still making assumptions based on incomplete information. They can't all be right since so many disagree.



Zero999 said:
HoloDust said:

I see you post from time to time about hardware, and I'm afraid it's too obvious from your posts that you know very little about how stuff works (mistaking 1 core from APU for GPU being obvious pointer to that).

I strongly suggest, for start, to dig through some threads here (Superchunk's comparison thread is, mostly, accurate enough) if you really want to learn a bit or two about PS4/XOne/WiiU.

Oh, and unlike what some people here living in Phantasy Kingdom believe, the gap between them is, unfortunately, really big - but that's what you get when you ditch successful Wii design, and instead of better innards you go for Gamepad.

and here comes the shitstorm again.

Wii u unknown number of GFLOPS but the 500-700 range is a safe bet. if we get the midle option it's like this: Wii u 600 gflops vs Xone 1200 gflops and ps4 1800 gflops. that's with all three sharing the same modern tools and in the diminishing returns era = not a big difference.

Instead of trying to offend me why don't you try countering my arguments with something better than "that's not true because I say so" wich is what you've been doing so far.

Why? Cause I tried once, but you seem to be beyond salvation.

And what arguments would be that exactly? You mean your belief that you can cram 480 shaders part in such a small space @40nm fab? Cause that's what you need to get above 500GLOPS at 550MHz clock rate. 700 GFLOPS? And you wonder why I laugh? You need 640 shaders at that clock for that. Unless you think Nintendo uses alien tech, I really can't figure out, if you ever bothered to dig bit deeper than your beliefs, where you're coming up with this numbers. (Not to mention that GFLOPS are completely meaningless when comparing PS4/XOne vs WiiU architecture, cause GCN is way more efficient than VLIW5)

Go research a bit, there's plenty of info out there, if you're really interested in anything but your "safe bets", and then we can perhaps have a discussion.



Zero999 said:
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:

good for you but that doesn't make them to advance for the current gen hardware

I'd disagree. Wii U has more than twice as much RAM as PS3 and 360, and X and Bayo 2 look like they make use of this with their detailed expansive backdrops.

The edram makes the actual performance of RAM be quite more than "twice the ps360".

You're saying this based on it having 32MB of eDRAM versus 10MB on 360?



orniletter said:
the thread that keeps giving...

I know, it's like junk food, I know it's got no real value, but it's just too fun to stop!