By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Could MK8, Bayo2 and X run on a PS3[60]

 

could they?

yes 280 32.52%
 
no 341 39.61%
 
maybe one of them could 124 14.40%
 
maybe two of them could 41 4.76%
 
see results 75 8.71%
 
Total:861
dahuman on 22 June 2013
HoloDust said:
Let's wait and see how MGSV and GTAV look on PS360.


I wouldn't count on GTA5, that thing looks massively cel-shaded which would save a ton of RAM by design so while looking great, won't be as technically impressive as something like X, MGSV looks really nice too, just not as much draw distance and is pretty much a ton of desert, and we'll see on that one since all the videos I saw had really good AA, and unless it's some form of really optimized MLAA, I'd just call it bullshit.



Around the Network
dahuman on 22 June 2013
ninjablade said:

All games are i posted all look more technically advanced then anything seen on wiiu, this is the highest quality picf of X on the net and its looks very unimpressive tech wise.


Awful example although expected from you, that's the low res SS from January so you are full of shit on that one. The teaser from E3 already looked better.



brendude13 on 22 June 2013

As long as they can find a way to cut down RAM usage without breaking the game, yes.

The very small increase in power in the Wii U would probably be offset by how experienced developers are with the PS3 and 360.



ninjablade on 22 June 2013
MDMAlliance said:
ninjablade said:
MDMAlliance said:
Anari said:
OMFG! Why are you people still wasting time with ninjablade?


Better question: Why not?


the floor with spikes in bayenetta 2 looks horrible, thats why.


Two can play at that game.  The background details and resolution is much higher in bayonetta 2.  Not only that, but a much sleeker model for the characters are being used.  Also, the lighting has improved in Bayonetta 2.  As you can see, the exact same argument you use against X can be used against Bayonetta.  Look at Bayonetta 2 and it uses a much more realistic shade for the shadows.  Also you can see the light reflecting off of the clothing on the Bayonetta 2 screen shot while in the original, you don't really have that at all.  Also, something you like bringing up too are jaggies.  Look at the one in the original vs the one in Bayonetta 2.  You mostly see the one in Bayonetta 2 where the floor  with spikes are, and if you haven't noticed, that thing is an attack (it comes up when she attacks).  The original has it much worse, and lets add to this and look at the fact that most of the rest of the screenshot looks far superior.  The buildings and everything.  Even the bad parts of the screenshot you pointed out are visible in the original quite easily.

those pics are both not 720p so i can't really tell about the jaggies, anyway were arguing about 2 ugly games that i don't care for or think are techically impressive in anyway except for running at 60fps. metal gear rising is 60 fps and looks better in everyway.



MDMAlliance on 22 June 2013
ninjablade said:

those pics are both not 720p so i can't really tell about the jaggies, anyway were arguing about 2 ugly games that i don't care for or think are techically impressive in anyway except for running at 60fps. metal gear rising is 60 fps and looks better in everyway.


I'm willing to bet Bayonetta 2 is at the least 720p.



Around the Network
ninjablade on 22 June 2013
dahuman said:
ninjablade said:

All games are i posted all look more technically advanced then anything seen on wiiu, this is the highest quality picf of X on the net and its looks very unimpressive tech wise.


Awful example although expected from you, that's the low res SS from January so you are full of shit on that one. The teaser from E3 already looked better.

the teaser of the crappy quailty youtube vid, that skips every 2 seconds of gameplay, if there was a better quality pic on the net i would use it but there aint.



ninjablade on 22 June 2013
MDMAlliance said:
ninjablade said:

those pics are both not 720p so i can't really tell about the jaggies, anyway were arguing about 2 ugly games that i don't care for or think are techically impressive in anyway except for running at 60fps. metal gear rising is 60 fps and looks better in everyway.


I'm willing to bet Bayonetta 2 is at the least 720p.

metal gear rising is 720p



dahuman on 22 June 2013
ninjablade said:
dahuman said:
ninjablade said:

All games are i posted all look more technically advanced then anything seen on wiiu, this is the highest quality picf of X on the net and its looks very unimpressive tech wise.


Awful example although expected from you, that's the low res SS from January so you are full of shit on that one. The teaser from E3 already looked better.

the teaser of the crappy quailty youtube vid, that skips every 2 seconds of gameplay, if there was a better quality pic on the net i would use it but there aint.

That picture is from an awful quality video too lol, why do you slap yourself in the face with every sentence you type? Do you ever get tired of embarrassing yourself?



curl-6 on 22 June 2013
Mr Puggsly said:
curl-6 said:
Mr Puggsly said:

curl-6 said:

 The question was whether they could run on PS3/360, not "could they run on PS3/360 if downgraded".

 

No, those same game could be brought to PS360. Could they look as polished is a different question.

Like games on PC and consoles. The PC version can always look and perform better, but that doesn't mean they haven't been able to bring those games to consoles.

By that logic the Wii can run most PS3/360 games. 

Perhaps. Multiple CoD games designed for PS360 specs were ported to the Wii. They look and run crappy, but still very similar.

However, the disparity in specs between PS360 and Wii are much bigger than PS360 and Wii U.

That's obviously not what the thread title is asking. The answer is so obvious it doesn't need to be asked if downgrades are allowed, in that case you could run anything on almost anything. PS2 could run The Last of Us if you cut it down enough.

The question is clearly asking whether these games, in their current state, could run on PS3/360. The answer is no for Bayonetta 2 and X, but probably yes for Mario Kart, unless Kart fills up more than 512MB of RAM.

At the end of the day, 1GB of RAM for games is a lot more than <500MB, and the Wii U GPU is several GPU generations ahead of the ones in the PS3 and 360. And we've barely seen the tip of the iceberg in terms of what the Wii U can do, it's still in its infancy.



ninjablade on 22 June 2013
dahuman said:
ninjablade said:
dahuman said:
ninjablade said:

All games are i posted all look more technically advanced then anything seen on wiiu, this is the highest quality picf of X on the net and its looks very unimpressive tech wise.


Awful example although expected from you, that's the low res SS from January so you are full of shit on that one. The teaser from E3 already looked better.

the teaser of the crappy quailty youtube vid, that skips every 2 seconds of gameplay, if there was a better quality pic on the net i would use it but there aint.

That picture is from an awful quality video too lol, why do you slap yourself in the face with every sentence you type? Do you ever get tired of embarrassing yourself?


nope that pics is an official pic from nintendo

 

,