What does it matter than Jaffe is a Sony fanboy through and through?  That's Jaffe who doesn't have anything to do with Kotaku.  The fact they like him and likes it when he talks means absolutely nothing.

If they were consistently critical of Nintendo then I wouldn't be able to casually skim two pages of stories and find that many pro Nintendo articles.

As for the anti-Wii commentary, it looks that way because Kotaku is very critical and often very sarcastic.  They're like that with just about everything.

I thought the Brawl thing was pretty much fair.  They got Brawl day one and couldn't get on.  I'm pretty sure they actually did something similar with Eye of Judgment when it was first released in that they couldn't connect and it wasn't picking up cards well, and that they were easily copied.  Does that mean they are unfair and biased against Sony?

If you don't feel like linking to the Pachter story, then don't bother bringing it up.

Is it so terrible that people want Miyamoto to work on something new?  He worked on Wii Fit and Wii Sports and look what came out of that.  Fuck yeah I want Miyamoto to work on new franchises.

VGChartz isn't pro Wii, the Wii is just on top.  When they post the numbers, they don't pad them slightly towards Nintendo because they want to appease the fans, that's just the numbers they get.

I really don't understand why you dread clicking Kotaku.  They're pretty harsh on most everybody and I'm sure it seems like they are worse to the Wii because that's the system you feel so strongly about.  They have done plenty of ripping on Sony and Microsoft and they have done plenty of praising of all three.  They simply get the news and then report on it.  If David Jaffe happens to be the hot topic of the day, they talk about Jeffe.  If SSBB is what's going on, they report on anything Brawl they can, good or bad.  I don't know if you know this, but that's actually good reporting.

And it's funny you mention Fox News.  They are clearly bias but they pigeon  hole stories to go exactly the way they want them to go.  They twists reports to appease their fanbase.  They leave out information or stories that they don't like.  Kotaku actually reports on everything and they do it fairly.

I realize 1up has several editors that dislike the Wii. However, didn't you contradict yourself just now?

First you criticized me for saying that the enthusiast media is biased, then you criticized me for not including 1up in the anti-wii biased list?

The reason I put 1up in the unbiased column is because they ATTEMPT to remain fair and balanced, even with their obvious dislike of the console. They give equal coverage to all systems and tend to report news stories without comments or biased. Their podcasts are disgusting and a completely different story, but their reviews are fair, though somewhat unprofessional by todays standards.

Are they biased? Yes. Does it hurt their reporting and their site? No, as it's fairly obvious that steps are taken to ensure this isn't an issue, unlike Kotaku. 

The articles you skimmed aren't pro-Nintendo, they're disgruntled admissions of the obvious.

Lets agree to disagree, because I'm tired of arguing with you. I think most people who have read this post will look at Kotaku in a different light, and we'll see, in time, if their anti-Nintendo biased, or lack thereof, keeps happening. 

Talk about a laughable article.  I'm willing to bet if you ask Nintendo fans on this board about 1up.com the word "unbiased" would only be said by a few if any.

I'm glad to see all the press that was clearly anti-Wii and anti-Nintendo from the start, become irrelevant like they are now.
These people were unreliable and ridiculous when I stopped gaming, and they only got worse when I came back. The first thing I noticed when I came back in early 2006 to discover the Wii, was the heavy anti-Nintendo feeling on nearly every gaming site.
To this day it's still the same, only a bit better because the "journalists" there are getting owned over and over, every month, by Nintendo and its DS and Wii consoles. And yes, Kotaku is one of these sites, and always was. For not seeing that, you must be pretty blinded.
I pity the fools of the Kotaku defense force, that dare say that smearing Nintendo patents, which have nothing to do with any news, is just being fair. The sole purpose of talking about these patents is to downplay Nintendo and say sth bad about them.

 I'm gonna have to agree with you here, it seems that many of the PS3 games deserving of high scores just aren't getting them from the "pro's", just look at the differences in user score and critics score, and you'll see what Riot means, at least in some cases.

Gamespot takes the crown though, their so called comparisons are so laughable, they made me quit using Gamespot alltogether.

 Well that's true of any videogame fan i imagine.  It's got a whopping 75% negative user opinion from gamerankings.  Everyone thinks their biased against their system.  Statistically it shows a slight negative bias on all systems which is doubled on the wii.  Though, slight.

Nonsense, the XB360 get none of this negative bias, and it's obvious, especially from western gaming sites ... which just means most of those read by english speaking people.

Again, proving my point is correct, but my analysis is wrong, actually makes the piece have more substance.

Well, I think it's true but it doesn't matter... The mainstream medias are extraordinarily pro-Wii.