By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - X's Graphics are just increibly amazing!!

Multimedialover on 12 June 2013
BossPuma said:
Multimedialover said:
BossPuma said:
Multimedialover said:
BossPuma said:
Multimedialover said:
Its alright.

Sadly wii u was dwarfed this e3 in visuals.

But I hope the games aremgood.

Sadly windwaker hd is why I will never support nintendo ever again.

Why did they not use the visual style of their zelda demo.

Remake a game with a completely different style of the original game? you cant be serious.


The original WW was my turning point away from Nintendo. I had the doouble pack. Played WW for around 10 hours. Put it away and played the GC edition of OOT instead.  Never finished WW, but completed OOT from the same box 3 times. Says it all.


Thats your personal tastes, defenitly not everyone else's

I agree. But Nintendo were at one point growwing with their aging userbase. All of a sudden they stopped doing that. Why?

N64 was a very grown up console, GC did not continue that. Resi evil exclusitivity was a great start for GC but after that downhill.


I play fun games, i dont care about how "childish" it is.

Thats fine. I likke fun games to. 

BUt that doesnt mean I dont like adult cntent as well. Im 30. I have a varied taste. And there is a HUGE part of my taste Ninty refuses to cater for.

Wy cant they do both?????????????????????????????????????

I like both.



Around the Network
BossPuma on 12 June 2013
Multimedialover said:
BossPuma said:
Multimedialover said:
BossPuma said:
Multimedialover said:
BossPuma said:
Multimedialover said:
Its alright.

Sadly wii u was dwarfed this e3 in visuals.

But I hope the games aremgood.

Sadly windwaker hd is why I will never support nintendo ever again.

Why did they not use the visual style of their zelda demo.

Remake a game with a completely different style of the original game? you cant be serious.


The original WW was my turning point away from Nintendo. I had the doouble pack. Played WW for around 10 hours. Put it away and played the GC edition of OOT instead.  Never finished WW, but completed OOT from the same box 3 times. Says it all.


Thats your personal tastes, defenitly not everyone else's

I agree. But Nintendo were at one point growwing with their aging userbase. All of a sudden they stopped doing that. Why?

N64 was a very grown up console, GC did not continue that. Resi evil exclusitivity was a great start for GC but after that downhill.


I play fun games, i dont care about how "childish" it is.

Thats fine. I likke fun games to. 

BUt that doesnt mean I dont like adult cntent as well. Im 30. I have a varied taste. And there is a HUGE part of my taste Ninty refuses to cater for.

Wy cant they do both?????????????????????????????????????

I like both.

Bayonetta 2 and X arent kids games. Assassins creed, Batman origins and Deus ex are adult focused 3rd party games as well.



Shinobi-san on 12 June 2013

This game is right up there with all the other next gen looking stuff shown at E3.

Sure if you take a magnifying glass and have a closer look it wont be as crisp as most games on PS4 but still both trailers blew my mind especially the first

IMO i havent seen anything from current gen that looks as good as this. I'm just calling it as a see it. Im sure digital foundry will have a much deeper look at whats going on under the hood. But all that stuff is just talk and doesnt mean much compared to my first hand perception of the games visuals.

There are so many games on PC that have all sorts of graphical tweaks and effects but still don't really look good. This game looks good end of story :D/



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|

superspeedybull on 12 June 2013
ninjablade said:
curl-6 said:
superspeedybull said:

The Point I am trying to make is the graphics are old by PS3 and 360 standards, it's not impressive looking in the graphics region because we have PS3 games that look better than this but for argument sakes if we put FF13-2 against X, they visuall difference is minimal. 

X looks far better than FF13-2, and no, Uncharted/Last of us/Beyond don't look better than X. They have better character models, but the overall level of detail is lower than X.

And for Pete's sake people, stop replying to Ninjablade. You're only fuelling his sad little crusade.


you have to be kidding if you think X is more detailed then last of us and uncharted2/3.


Dude this is something of personal opinion, if they think X looks better than any current gen game let them. And where are you taking your argument? What are you trying to prove, We all know the Wii U o n paper is weaker than the PS3 and 360 but I'm sure I can think of 99 million reasons why graphics dont matter (Wii).



curl-6 on 12 June 2013
superspeedybull said:

We all know the Wii U o n paper is weaker than the PS3 and 360

Except that it isn't.



Around the Network
superspeedybull on 12 June 2013
curl-6 said:
superspeedybull said:

We all know the Wii U o n paper is weaker than the PS3 and 360

Except that it isn't.


On paper the Wii U processor is much weaker, The GPU has less cores and lower TFLOPS, the only thing the Wii U has over the 360 is 2GB of Ram and it runs 60fps nativley. 



curl-6 on 12 June 2013
superspeedybull said:
curl-6 said:
superspeedybull said:

We all know the Wii U o n paper is weaker than the PS3 and 360

Except that it isn't.


On paper the Wii U processor is much weaker, The GPU has less cores and lower TFLOPS, the only thing the Wii U has over the 360 is 2GB of Ram and it runs 60fps nativley. 

Actually, Wii U's GPU is several generations ahead of the PS3 and 360's.



superspeedybull on 12 June 2013
curl-6 said:
superspeedybull said:
curl-6 said:
superspeedybull said:

We all know the Wii U o n paper is weaker than the PS3 and 360

Except that it isn't.


On paper the Wii U processor is much weaker, The GPU has less cores and lower TFLOPS, the only thing the Wii U has over the 360 is 2GB of Ram and it runs 60fps nativley. 

Actually, Wii U's GPU is several generations ahead of the PS3 and 360's.

The Wii U GPU has more bandwith but less shaders at a lower frequency.



KHlover on 12 June 2013
superspeedybull said:
curl-6 said:
superspeedybull said:
curl-6 said:
superspeedybull said:

We all know the Wii U o n paper is weaker than the PS3 and 360

Except that it isn't.


On paper the Wii U processor is much weaker, The GPU has less cores and lower TFLOPS, the only thing the Wii U has over the 360 is 2GB of Ram and it runs 60fps nativley. 

Actually, Wii U's GPU is several generations ahead of the PS3 and 360's.

The Wii U GPU has more bandwith but less shaders at a lower frequency.

NB, has no one told you using alt accounts is not permitted on VGChartz?



Some useful VGChartz tweaks

Member of the "An Unbiased Review" Database team

dahuman on 12 June 2013
superspeedybull said:
curl-6 said:
superspeedybull said:
curl-6 said:
superspeedybull said:

We all know the Wii U o n paper is weaker than the PS3 and 360

Except that it isn't.


On paper the Wii U processor is much weaker, The GPU has less cores and lower TFLOPS, the only thing the Wii U has over the 360 is 2GB of Ram and it runs 60fps nativley. 

Actually, Wii U's GPU is several generations ahead of the PS3 and 360's.

The Wii U GPU has more bandwith but less shaders at a lower frequency.

Are you the engineer that designed the Wii U? I'd like to have some factual sources that are not speculations please. I'm also hoping you are not a troll account and would actually have something to contribute to the truth. Thought I doubt you are a tech expert by the way you used FLOPS and RAM.