By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - X's Graphics are just increibly amazing!!

twilight_link on 12 June 2013
ninjablade said:
twilight_link said:
ninjablade said:
twilight_link said:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpgdkPxA0Kk

this is RDR in actual gameplay, X looks far superior

 

the guy ninjablade is a joke just look at what he wrote

 

"WII on par with current gen"

what a mess he is unable to get even elementary shit straight

your comparing a trailer to boring gameplay, here is a trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afhcpsLIh_4 that makes RDR look much better then X which has poor image quality, and poor lighting, not to mention all the foliage is 2D, but lets not forget that scale it blows away everything

the trailer is wastly different to actual gameplay on actual hardware

I take you own on ps3, cause on 360 it looks so much better, yea my copy of red dead looks better then that trailer on my set.


your twaddle is nothing but horrible mess, stream of lies and unsupported nonsense



Around the Network
ninjablade on 12 June 2013
twilight_link said:
ninjablade said:
twilight_link said:
ninjablade said:
twilight_link said:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpgdkPxA0Kk

this is RDR in actual gameplay, X looks far superior

 

the guy ninjablade is a joke just look at what he wrote

 

"WII on par with current gen"

what a mess he is unable to get even elementary shit straight

your comparing a trailer to boring gameplay, here is a trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afhcpsLIh_4 that makes RDR look much better then X which has poor image quality, and poor lighting, not to mention all the foliage is 2D, but lets not forget that scale it blows away everything

the trailer is wastly different to actual gameplay on actual hardware

I take you own on ps3, cause on 360 it looks so much better, yea my copy of red dead looks better then that trailer on my set.


your twaddle is nothing but horrible mess, stream of lies and unsupported nonsense


ok buddy



twilight_link on 12 June 2013

@ninjablade:the problem is not whether X is better than current gen, i personally don't care about graphics, I'm in no way 8GB GDDR5 idolater as you and your ilk, the problem is you supported your point with nothing but lies, half truths, and with pure nonsense, i know Playstation fans generally are fools but sometimes their delusion is not even funny.



BossPuma on 12 June 2013
ninjablade said:
keroncoward said:
ninjablade said:
keroncoward said:
ninjablade said:
keroncoward said:
AgentZorn said:
Oh lord here comes ninjablade.

Some ares look a little rough but overall it looks nice and the art direction looks superb.


I take it he was proven wrong about Wii U being last gen with this game and just dont want to admit it?


I can't admit something when its false, you can do a HD pic comparsion thread of current gen vs wiiu and 360/ps3 will look much better, the only thing i hear thats impressive about X is scale, so at best even with the hyperbole added its looks a bit better then open world 360/ps3 games but real nextgen systems already are a huge step up in resolution, IQ, textures, detail, everythingthing looks better.


So in conclusion Wii U is not current gen is what youre saying since you just admitted current gen cant handle a game of scale like this?

i said with hyperbole added, i haven't played the game to know the scale, but you can clearly see the lighing is static, while open world games like RDR/GTA5 have dynamic lighting, so there is trade offs being made to get it running like lighting and 2d foilage.


So in other words you will just saying anything to downplay the visual quality of the game. You were wrong about the hardware so just get over it. Everyone is wrong at least once in their life.

They did nothing to prove me wrong today. People hyping X and Mario Kart graphics are largely basing it off of the crappy video and filling in the blanks from there. here is a hd pic of a so called nextgen game to prove my point
 X will have the same crappy image quality of current gen, same jaggies same textures, still waiting for those X HD pics, that nintedo will never release.

So you're saying the games look bad? Would they detract from your aprecciation if they had a little less polygons?



Mr Khan on 12 June 2013
ninjablade said:
MDMAlliance said:
ninjablade said:
MDMAlliance said:

Just so you know, dynamic lighting takes a lot less than draw distance does.  Also, there was gameplay footage.  As for the pop-ins, we can't fully judge that but there are a LOT of things we can't fully judge yet as the game isn't completed yet.

As for the 2D foliage thing, it's the same thing.  However I am NOT saying "it will definitely be changed later."  I'm just saying it's likely they may change that as they further develop the game (as in making tweaks to the game).  

exactly and judging from the trailer your really  say its more impressive techically then current gen, people are just saying it looks nextgen based on the art, techically it not even above current gen, unless  nextegn to you is a nice draw distance with trade offs.


You're wording it incorrectly.   It has to do with the scope of the game and really a lot of other stuff.  As games have higher draw distance, it takes up much much more to keep up the fidelity of the game.  The trade offs of the game are relatively small considering how good it looks in combination with the art style.  Not entirely sure how you can't see how this can qualify as "above current gen."  

because for a game to be above cuurentgen it has to have the complete package, people  are saying scale and scope yet i don't see a gameplay demonstarion, it very hard to say its above currentgen based on these thing, we need to know the image quality, framerate, pop in, basically you need to have played the game for a few hours to judge scope and see if its above currentgen because the seperation is so small.

Uhh. The trailers are gameplay.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Around the Network
BossPuma on 12 June 2013
Multimedialover said:
Its alright.

Sadly wii u was dwarfed this e3 in visuals.

But I hope the games aremgood.

Sadly windwaker hd is why I will never support nintendo ever again.

Why did they not use the visual style of their zelda demo.

Remake a game with a completely different style of the original game? you cant be serious.



curl-6 on 12 June 2013
superspeedybull said:

The Point I am trying to make is the graphics are old by PS3 and 360 standards, it's not impressive looking in the graphics region because we have PS3 games that look better than this but for argument sakes if we put FF13-2 against X, they visuall difference is minimal. 

X looks far better than FF13-2, and no, Uncharted/Last of us/Beyond don't look better than X. They have better character models, but the overall level of detail is lower than X.

And for Pete's sake people, stop replying to Ninjablade. You're only fuelling his sad little crusade.



ninjablade on 12 June 2013
Mr Khan said:
ninjablade said:
MDMAlliance said:
ninjablade said:
MDMAlliance said:

Just so you know, dynamic lighting takes a lot less than draw distance does.  Also, there was gameplay footage.  As for the pop-ins, we can't fully judge that but there are a LOT of things we can't fully judge yet as the game isn't completed yet.

As for the 2D foliage thing, it's the same thing.  However I am NOT saying "it will definitely be changed later."  I'm just saying it's likely they may change that as they further develop the game (as in making tweaks to the game).  

exactly and judging from the trailer your really  say its more impressive techically then current gen, people are just saying it looks nextgen based on the art, techically it not even above current gen, unless  nextegn to you is a nice draw distance with trade offs.


You're wording it incorrectly.   It has to do with the scope of the game and really a lot of other stuff.  As games have higher draw distance, it takes up much much more to keep up the fidelity of the game.  The trade offs of the game are relatively small considering how good it looks in combination with the art style.  Not entirely sure how you can't see how this can qualify as "above current gen."  

because for a game to be above cuurentgen it has to have the complete package, people  are saying scale and scope yet i don't see a gameplay demonstarion, it very hard to say its above currentgen based on these thing, we need to know the image quality, framerate, pop in, basically you need to have played the game for a few hours to judge scope and see if its above currentgen because the seperation is so small.

Uhh. The trailers are gameplay.


yea i know its gameplay, but its not proper gameplay, its shifting every 2-3 sceonds, i'm talking about a proper direct feed gameplay video.



Mr Khan on 12 June 2013
ninjablade said:
keroncoward said:


So in other words you will just saying anything to downplay the visual quality of the game. You were wrong about the hardware so just get over it. Everyone is wrong at least once in their life.

They did nothing to prove me wrong today. People hyping X and Mario Kart graphics are largely basing it off of the crappy video and filling in the blanks from there. here is a hd pic of a so called nextgen game to prove my point
 X will have the same crappy image quality of current gen, same jaggies same textures, still waiting for those X HD pics, that nintedo will never release.

You're acting like Nintendo's trying to hide something. Nintendo's not releasing HD pics because A: Nintendo really doesn't care about graphics wars and B: the game is still, in all likelihood, a year or more away from release.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

ninjablade on 12 June 2013
curl-6 said:
superspeedybull said:

The Point I am trying to make is the graphics are old by PS3 and 360 standards, it's not impressive looking in the graphics region because we have PS3 games that look better than this but for argument sakes if we put FF13-2 against X, they visuall difference is minimal. 

X looks far better than FF13-2, and no, Uncharted/Last of us/Beyond don't look better than X. They have better character models, but the overall level of detail is lower than X.

And for Pete's sake people, stop replying to Ninjablade. You're only fuelling his sad little crusade.


you have to be kidding if you think X is more detailed then last of us and uncharted2/3.