By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - PS4 Now requires PS+ for MULTIPLAYER!

 

Are you jumping out because of the loss of free multiplayer?

Yes 191 17.83%
 
No 708 66.11%
 
See Results 172 16.06%
 
Total:1,071
Darth Tigris said:
Remember when people were criticized for defending the Xbox One's DRM?

How about we all just be honest: people are hypocrites.

exactly, i admit i stated many times i did not think Sony would go the route of "required pay to play for online for the PS4" and right now they have starting with the PS4! AND THAT IS THAT Iwas wrong, BUT THERE WAS MANY ON HERE THAT STATED SONY HAS TO HAVE DRM required and I also stated, no they do not have to have it required, and many stated well if Microsoft has it so must Sony, well they do not have DRM required on the PS4. and those same people that swore up and down Sony would well the same goes for your claim.



I AM BOLO

100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...

ps:

Proud psOne/2/3/p owner.  I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.

Around the Network
joeorc said:
JusSayian said:

Its funny how people used to the whole free online as a weapon and the main reason why they bought a ps3 now that its gone it doesn't matter.  Hypocrites lol

I can still play online multi-player free on my PS3, while with the xbox360 multi-player still cost's you money, so no they are still not the same thing.


Okay ill make myself more clear. Its funny how ps fanboys are eating this up when just 24 hours ago they were against paying to play online.



Talal said:
J_Allard said:
As long as online play is way better than it was on PS3, paying to play doesn't bother me.


You must have owned a ps3 pre 2008.

Actually I became an owner right after KZ2 came out. So 2009.



Talal said:
Imaginedvl said:
walsufnir said:
Hahaha, sorry guys, but all this "no problem for me" *now*... Well, it's nice to see how opinions can change if you don't have an option anymore :) PAYWALL!

Yah when I saw the "it is okay, good strategy from Sony, expected, it does not bother me at all" reactions from the so called Playstation nationi was laughting out hard ;) this is so hilarious to know the same exact people were bashing Xboxlive so hard not a werk ago and "claiming" they would never pay for it! Fun time!


I'm still against paying for online, but XBox did it even when the competition did it for free. That's much much worse than what's happening now.

Riiiiiiight :) Enjoy your online multiplayer!



It's fine for me, I've been a Plus subscriber for a year now and have no intention of stopping.



Sigs are dumb. And so are you!

Around the Network

I will pay this lots of free games



VITA 32 GIG CARD.250 GIG SLIM & 160 GIG PHAT PS3

I've had PS+ since a month after the service launched so this doesn't affect me. Still, it's a lame move. I get why the did it, why it's the best move, and it was a great conference except for that minor stain but it's still kinda lame.



4 ≈ One

Otakumegane said:
Sigh.....yeah I'm sad now. I'll get a ps3 and stick with tat it seems.

Every month that you pay 5 dollars you get ~30-100 dollars in free games, including retail.  Not getting PS Plus is almost like not buying something that's 90% off.  And you can't believe this wasn't coming after so many years of MS making so much free money on it.  Focus on all the things they did amazingly well!



You guys do realize 60 dollars per year for plus nets over 100 dollars of games/discounts right?



           

Assuming you're going to play the free games, or take advantage of any of the discounts PSN+ offers on new titles, the subscription pays for itself pretty fast.

But, if you're ONLY paying $50 a year to play your $60 games online, particularly if you only buy a handful of games a year, you're better off playing on PC if you can deal with the inconveniences.