Gehirnkrampf said:
|
?
Gehirnkrampf said:
|
?
Hmmmmm... lets attack a reviewer's integrity while picking quotes completely out of context to make him look bad. Seems legit.
| PullusPardus said:
You really think journalists never get paid? what about Mass Effect 3 ? when it came out, it was game of the years / generation whatever, then after people played it , was a huge backlash |
There was a backlash because people get irrationally upset over paid launch DLC and bad endings. Yes, those were problems. No, they didn't ruin the rest of the experience.
ME3 is still my GoTY of 2012, and I certainly haven't been bribed to say that because I didn't write the review.
Yeah, forget the 20+ other critics that didn't think much of it. But of course, let's focus solely on IGN.
| AndrewWK said: No he gave it 5.9 because the combat doesn´t feal really good and the Gameplay aspect of this "game" is the weakest part. You should read the whole review. He makes valid points. And you are in no position to judge because you have not yet played the game. |
Assuming you have not played the game...how can you say his points are valid?
Remember, kids, any review that you disagree with must have been paid for. Let's keep things simple.

Don't worry.. With lost planet 3 capcom has another game that will bomb..







Face the future.. Gamecenter ID: nikkom_nl (oh no he didn't!!)
Zizzla_Rachet said:
|
Well I don´t know, maybe because he is a profesional fucking journalist who has already played this game. Arthur Gies from Polygon and the guys from GameOne have the same complaints about the game.
http://www.polygon.com/game/remember-me/3067
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.





