Imaginedvl said:
RenCutypoison said:
Imaginedvl said:
RenCutypoison said:
Imaginedvl said:
ethomaz said: Skype - I'm not sure but Vita have Skype so why PS4 can't have too? Anyway others voice/video calling service will be supported by PS4 too. Skydrive - Sony have their own cloud storage service and they will make others patners for that too. Windows - Windows kernel better for multitasking? Sorry but it is worst than Linux and Mac OSX (BSD based) for multitasking... Sony will use a OS with BSD kernel and I can't see worst multitasking here... but I agree Windows have better UI but Sony can put a good UI over BSD too. Azure - That is yet uncertain over the cloud services... Sony bought Gaikai for nothing? Kinect 2.0 - That is really better than PSEye. |
What are you talking about? Windows kernel is as good as any other OS for multitasking/threading... It is the same kernel used in Windows Server; running background process/threads is not BETTER on MacOS or Linux (by the way MacOS is based on Linux...)... It is one thing to dislike Windows user interface or ecosystem but saying clueless comments about the kernel is another one :) The windows kernel (NT kernel based on Unix) is one of the best OS out there and is has nothing to do with what the anti-MS-Windows train is QQing about.
|
Did you ever had an IT class ? Windows was the last one to do multitasking, BSD already had multiple people working on the same device simultaneously in the 80's.
It's no scoop, no matter what windows does, UNIX based OS already did 10 years before. Like this Aero shit (Already working on Linux based OS 5 years before. and better).
|
ROFL! Good for you if you went in an IT class 30 years ago.
First > NT KERNEL is based on Unix. Second > We are not in the 80s anymore. You know Microsoft did a LOT of work on their kernel and it is not because 30 years ago, Windows kernel was shitty that it is still bad today. Finally... Are you REALLY comparing AREO with the multitasking/multi-processing/multi-threading capabilities of the kernel? Really?
|
NT kernel was build from ground up. It has nothing to do with UNIX.
I'm comparing OS functionalities with OS functionalities.
Yeah, windows actual multitasking capabilities are better. For the first time in history.
Don't poop on history, Microsoft has always done everything worst than competition, except marketing.
Windows OS are the only OS capable of crashing without any fault of the user, and that's not nothing.
They do it better on an OS. With multiples harware. Sony has more experience on custom OS for single platform. And looking at history is the best way to predict the future. If you do shit for 25 years than do 1 thing right, what is the probability you keep going that way ?
|
Edit: By based on Unix I mean in term of functionalities, MS created the NT kernel (new tech) kernel based on Unix kernel features.
We are talking about the kernel not about the UI interface... You are comparing apples with oranges.
> Windows OS are the only OS capable of crashing without any fault of the user, and that's not nothing.
Yah, my MacOS NEVER crashed on me :) right... Also go and say that to the millions of company using Windows "SERVER" for their enterprise application server... You must be right, they are crashing a lot...
Your 2 last posts clearly demonstrated how much you just hate Microsoft... There is just no point of debating with you as you are just going to throw insults about them for the next 10 posts.
You don't like them; got it. Does not make your points more valid.
|
I do hate microsoft. I liked Xbox 360.
I do not know where your love from them comes, but they have proven trough history that whenever they try to do anything else than software, they fall hard.
You cannot take a point on the timeline and base all your estimation on it.
And yeah. Nt capabilities are based on Unix. That's exactly my point.
They never innovate. Somebody else innovate, they make it theirs, and then, sometimes, they make it better. Sometimes.
Let's look at PS4 now. It's been proven more powerfull. Everything points out that multimedia capabilities of the XBone is software (3GB ram for the OS is even worst than windows, seriously).
If it's software, what proves sony cannot do the same ? Right now they have a console with 4GB of ram free. You really think they cannot use it to do the same, knowing they are based on the exact same architecture ?