"Responsible for a hell of a lot" and "deserves a lot of respect for it" don't *necissarily* go hand in hand. I fully recognize the former, but the latter isn't a given. Bush is a good example of someone who is "responsible for a hell of a lot," but doesn't even deserve so much as the 25% approval rate he currently sports. Kutaragi did a lot, but it's legitimate to point out that not all of it was good. He marketed two consecutive under-powered machines as over-powered machines, and got away with it. I wouldn't mark that under "good," personally.
But then again, I'm posting at 1:00 AM again... maybe ignore this post...
interesting argument so I'll bite! That analogy would work if Ken was responsible for the 3D0, Atari Jaguar and the Virtual Boy. The long and short of it is that under him, Sony launched the two most succesfull home consoles ever. Bush launched the U.S.'s second least succesful War ever (I mean of course the war of 1812, this is tied with Vietnam so far). However, that is for an off topic thread. A horrible, horrible flame ridden off topic thread. Politics belong everywhere except internet forums.
I'm a mod, come to me if there's mod'n to do.
Chrizum is the best thing to happen to the internet, Period.
Serves me right for challenging his sales predictions!
Bet with dsisister44: Red Steel 2 will sell 1 million within it's first 365 days of sales.