By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - GT5 passes Halo Reach in global lifetime sales!

Carl2291 said:
JayWood2010 said:

I'm not argueing.  I dont think sales deserves to be called out for what he said when he really didnt say anything wrong.


You still havent answered the question. Why are you avoiding the question?

S



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

Around the Network
Carl2291 said:
JayWood2010 said:

I'm not argueing.  I dont think sales deserves to be called out for what he said when he really didnt say anything wrong.


You still havent answered the question. Why are you avoiding the question?


As far as I'm aware ive answered you and then we went in another circle.  Just PM me if you have any questions.  I'll be more than happy to answer anything you want me to.




       

dsgrue3 said:
sales2099 said:
dsgrue3 said:
JayWood2010 said:
dsgrue3 said:
Sales2099 is the king on nonsensical comparisons.

Have you already forgotten his infamous sig that I made fun of through usage of argumentum ad absurdum?


He isn't being nonsensical or absurd at all.  He said there is no right or wrong answer.  Just because you don't agree with him doesn't mean he is wrong.  People's views are not always the same.

You've already lost all credibility and are in a close second to Sales2099 at this point.

You compared 6 individual Halo games to 1 PS3 Game, a prologue, and for some reason included a PSP game (lol?)

Clearly you do not understand what an equal comparison looks like.

Not that I am saying Jay is not credible, but if he said the world is round, credibility issues aside, he is still right ;)

Some things arent fair, and to try to make it fair only means your trying to twist and create a comparison from chaos, no better then what I or he is trying to do. There is nothing wrong with comparing IP to IP sales. Your perspective is ok too.

Its called perspective and different opinions.

No it's about forming valid comparisons.

You are cherry-picking sales - i.e. chosing an arbitrary time frame to reference the sales of an entire franchise whose sales extrend well beyond that specific time frame.

History does not end when you say it does, nor are sales that occurred prior to this generation obsolete.

If you want to do a franchise comparison, do one...but the valid one is one that doesn't cherry pick.

GT Franchise - 55.88

Halo Franchise -67.69

Now if you want to compare specific games, you do that in the appropriate way - by comparing their entire history.

i.e. GT5 sales vs. Forza 3 sales.

NOT 2012 GT5 sales vs 2012 Forza: Horizon sales

Do you understand yet, cherry picker?

Perspective......please learnt hat you have the right to use your own perspective with varying criteria.

I myself, would limit comparisons to the current most generation in this case. You can't stop me and there is no rule that says I cant do that.

I could also do 2012 sales of IP vs IP if I so chose to as well. There. Is. No. Universal. Criteria.

In this thread case, I chose to pit GT5 against Halo 3, the best vs the best. Or as Jay put it, IP vs IP for the current gen.

 

I don't know how to make it any clearer. You are incapable of accepting different perspectives, and on top of that talk down to those who have one. I feel sorry if this attitude is present in the real world.



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

sales2099 said:

Perspective......please learnt hat you have the right to use your own perspective with varying criteria.

I myself, would limit comparisons to the current most generation in this case. You can't stop me and there is no rule that says I cant do that.

I could also do 2012 sales of IP vs IP if I so chose to as well. There. Is. No. Universal. Criteria.

In this thread case, I chose to pit GT5 against Halo 3, the best vs the best. Or as Jay put it, IP vs IP for the current gen.

 

I don't know how to make it any clearer. You are incapable of accepting different perspectives, and on top of that talk down to those who have one. I feel sorry if this attitude is present in the real world.

Except there is a criteria for LOGIC. Cherry-picking is a logical fallacy and thus you are making an ILLOGICAL comparison.

I can't be any clearer about it.

You're welcome to make ILLOGICAL comparisons, but as they say "garbage in, garbage out."



dsgrue3 said:
sales2099 said:

Perspective......please learnt hat you have the right to use your own perspective with varying criteria.

I myself, would limit comparisons to the current most generation in this case. You can't stop me and there is no rule that says I cant do that.

I could also do 2012 sales of IP vs IP if I so chose to as well. There. Is. No. Universal. Criteria.

In this thread case, I chose to pit GT5 against Halo 3, the best vs the best. Or as Jay put it, IP vs IP for the current gen.

 

I don't know how to make it any clearer. You are incapable of accepting different perspectives, and on top of that talk down to those who have one. I feel sorry if this attitude is present in the real world.

Except there is a criteria for LOGIC. Cherry-picking is a logical fallacy and thus you are making an ILLOGICAL comparison.

I can't be any clearer about it.

You're welcome to make ILLOGICAL comparisons, but as they say "garbage in, garbage out."

Arguing about video game sales in a serious manner on the internet has inherently no logic to it. lol. Its not illogical, you just simply don't agree with it.



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

Around the Network
walsufnir said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:


Its not a demo, its a fullscale game that I still to this day feel shouldn't have been $60. Felt like my wallet was raped by Microsoft that day. I beat that game with my friend in five hours and I we sat on the couch saying....really? This a $30 game at best. It easily could've been an expansion downloadable on Xbox Live.


So what was the 40€ price for GT5:P, the demo for GT5? A mass-rape or what? My, sometimes your choice of words is just disgusting.


First of all GT5P was cheaper in Euros because it was $40 in American currency. When I played the two hour halloween expansion of Infamous: Festival of Blood it was guess what? $10 dollars (again...a price which is cheaper to you). ODST was a full priced game when it didnt need to be. Microsoft always goes for the gut even if they know they dont have a full product and it would've sold much more than it did if MS wouldn't priced it fairly. GT5 prologue was well worth the price with the amount of cars even though they had a shortage of tracks. Everyone knew the full game was coming eventually. People obviously thought the price of GT5P was fair because it sold pretty much double what Halo:ODST did. After ODST MS proved themselves to be no better than EA in their train of thought.



sales2099 said:
dsgrue3 said:

Except there is a criteria for LOGIC. Cherry-picking is a logical fallacy and thus you are making an ILLOGICAL comparison.

I can't be any clearer about it.

You're welcome to make ILLOGICAL comparisons, but as they say "garbage in, garbage out."

Arguing about video game sales in a serious manner on the internet has inherently no logic to it. lol. Its not illogical, you just simply don't agree with it.

Patently false.

But thanks for playing; once again proving you know nothing of logic.



dsgrue3 said:
sales2099 said:
dsgrue3 said:

Except there is a criteria for LOGIC. Cherry-picking is a logical fallacy and thus you are making an ILLOGICAL comparison.

I can't be any clearer about it.

You're welcome to make ILLOGICAL comparisons, but as they say "garbage in, garbage out."

Arguing about video game sales in a serious manner on the internet has inherently no logic to it. lol. Its not illogical, you just simply don't agree with it.

Patently false.

But thanks for playing; once again proving you know nothing of logic.

Ok, says the guy spending his day arguing about video game sales :P (as am I, but hey, im also working)

Maybe ill make a thread comparing Geometry Wars to GTA5. Maybe a detailed chart comparing Super Mario IP sales VS Killzone 3 only. Perhaps something about Fable: The Journey VS Pokemon Black and White 2 sales. I hope you see the point im trying to make.

Were done here, but if anything can be taken away from this, please be more strict of your definition of "nonsensical" and "having no logic".



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

Farsala said:
Very entertaining thread, very well done. Unfortunately for Halo and GT their are a lot of people that will mindlessly argue about it. I believe the games deserve better!


I wish some people had your logic. These games should not be compared and are a testament to the strengths of their brand and nothing more. Microsoft has the best shooter and Sony has the best racer, plain and simple.



CGI-Quality said:
sales2099 said:

Arguing about video game sales in a serious manner on the internet has inherently no logic to it. lol.

If that's the case, the very reason for this site's existence fades.

Most humans don't operate on logic all the time. Some more then others. Tis our nature....embrace it!!!



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles.