By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - What is the answer to radical Islam? This is NOT an anti Islam thread

fillet said:
MikeRox said:
fillet said:

Completely different.

You're talking about terrorism over occupation issues.


Without Muslims we wouldn't have these bombings/terrorims/acts of evil/disgusting people.

You just said without muslims we wouldn't have bombings/terrorism...

I provided evidence that non muslim entities still bomb/use terrorism/perform acts of evil and can be disgusting people. Seems exactly the same to me.


Sorry I should have been more specific obviously I meant within the context of radical islam, "these" as in to say the ones that are carried out in the name of islam by extreme Muslims.

I'm not anti Muslim or anything and don't blame everything wrong in the world on them, for that I blame religion in general as being the root of all evil combined with complacency within the moderates in religion.


Sorry if I seem really hostile over it, but I was born in the UK in the 80s. My image of a "terrorist" was a white guy in a balaclava for the IRA. I was in Manchester on the day that bomb was set off and only 11 years old. I also grew up in a part of the country with a lot of muslims, so they are my childhood friends, they are now my neighbours etc (the UK is very multi cultural in that regard and it's one of the few countries like that). There is definitely a problem with extremism. But I actually think western society is helping to reinforce that hatred and give the extremists who are preaching this crap a "valid source" :(



RIP Dad 25/11/51 - 13/12/13. You will be missed but never forgotten.

Around the Network

 

Why do you say "ask any muslim" when several deeply devoted muslims would say it's clear that muslims, even all muslims, are called to bring the world under islam?

Yes, the Koran is a very confusing book which contradicts itself in many many occasions. You quoted one peaceful passage, I can quote several others who counter your passage.

"The only reason islam is a political ideology" is not just because the ME has been under a continious dominance by islam (btw, christianity in the West has too, even longer than islam anywhere in the world), it is also because the Koran explicitly states it, unlike other world religions like bhuddism and christianity who are of personal and religious nature and not societal or political.

"Our government is 99% responsible" for muslim terror attacks in the West, wow, I'll let that speak for itself.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/6120373/Top-10-worst-Bible-passages.html 

Christianity is political too and has canon law. Difference is compared to Islam, no country has adopted it and the main centres of Christianity are now secular with a clear seperation of Church and State and strong humanist elements in society to keep religious influence minimal. If say Europe adopted Christian laws then it wouldn't be much different from Muslim countries with Sharia. Muhammed basically copied Judeo-Christian religion and 'Arabized' it, he didn't just invent stoning to death for adultery, such punishments were nicked from the Bible.

I love reading these very partial sites but with irrefutable evidence http://www.evilbible.com/ http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/



spurgeonryan said:
MikeRox said:
Proclus said:
I'm going to be extremely unpopular by saying this, but so be it, I'm entitled to my opinion like everyone else:

Stop mass bombing ordinary citizens, families and just general regular Muslims. Far too many innocent people have been killed during wars (Ill conceived wars or otherwise) due to either incompetence or unwillingness.

General bad attitude towards Muslims doesn't help either, bombing cities in the so called quest for their freedom and then doing a half-assed job or not at all to rebuild the cities and help the citizens generates a huge amount of animosity.

I think perhaps certain individuals join these radical groups over nothing more than a general dislike for Americans created during the Bush and Obama regime.

Just my honest thoughts.


I agree entirely. Nothing helps create an extremist better than having their family killed by a "repressive external force". If you put yourself into an ordinary Iraqi or Afghan's shoes for a minute as an example, it's quite easy to see where the hate comes from.

And that is why your opinion is not going to be liked. All we do over there is reconstruction! Have you been deployed? What do you know besides what is hand fed you on the news? Yeah, they all got it sooo bad over there.

How about they keep their religion over there and leave the rest of the World ( America) alone. Don't admit to bombing us, don't bomb us, don't say things over video that is going to make us hate you, don't make nuclear weapons for the sole purpose of blasting some major American city, respect our culture like you want us to respect yours, stop getting so mad when South Park or Craig Ferguson or anyone else makes fun of Muhamad.

They are 14-20 hours away from America. That should be far enough so we do not have to worry about being bothered by them.

Oh yeah, don't praise Allah and Muhamed and then butcher and torture your people, including Females. Then you will not bring on the wrath of the West.


I'm sorry... are you under the misguided opinion that I am a muslim or from the middle east? Do you proclaim to know what life is like anywhere other than the country you currently live in?

How about you keep you close minded bigoted opinions to yourself and embrace multiculturalism in a non racist manner? Anybody who has actually served in Iraq/Afghanistan for any period of time, has done so against muslim counterparts with exactly the same objectives. I am a white Christian born British male. Our media is faaaar more balanced than your's could ever hope to be so long as you continue to accept such openly offensive opinions as acceptable in society.

I don't praise any god as I am agnostic. However, I also have respect (something clearly lacking in your post) and will never ridicule anyone else for their beliefs, whether in God, Allah, Nothing or the Potato King. Wrath of the West? That is a big factor in the Eastern hatred of the West. If you cannot see that, carry on living in teletubby land. 

I guess you approve of the antics of the Westboro Church, as they are the US's equivalent of the extreme muslim movements.  I also guess that means by default all Christians share the same view as the Westboro church and so you are anti gay etc. You are right, you are 14-20 hours away from the real world, and this is why you have no clue whatsoever as to what life in the real world is like.



RIP Dad 25/11/51 - 13/12/13. You will be missed but never forgotten.

Slimebeast said:
ToraTiger said:
Slimebeast said:
ToraTiger said:
Slimebeast said:

Unlike many other religions it is built into islam to conquer the world and submit the unbelievers. I think that is key here.

The muslims tried to conquer Europe as early as in the 8th century until the Franks stopped them. To constantly blame Western world atrocities as a cause for muslim aggression is naive and an expression of self-hate.

What should be done?

Try to stay out the Middle East to not aggravate islamists more than necessary. But I think it was right to invade Afghanistan after 9/11 to stop Al-Qaeda and it's certainly right that the US defends and supports Israel.

Stop funding Saudi-Arabia, Egypt and whatnot.

Restrict immigration from islamic countries to the West. Do not let muslims build mosques with tall minarets or call to prayer in Europe, and don't give them special rights that threaten the democratic prinicples of the West.

Try to decrease oil dependancy of OPEC.

Not true at all.  There's nothing in the Islam holy book that states to kill or provoke non-beilevers in any way. 

Now you don't say anything about how the Christians tried to do the same thing, but that behaviour isn't the way of the Bible, either.  It's the indiviuals that caused that, not the religion.  To think that is ludacris.   If they really wanted to conquer the World, don't you think they would have tried that by now?  And can you please clarify why do you think they want to kill everyone else who isn't Muslim?

It's not naive to think it's the West's fault, because it probably is.  We've been involved in so many wars in the middle east over the course of the last three decades, it's ridiculous.  It might be for oil.

Actually, I think the terrorist attacks on the US is a direct result of the hate that some Muslims have for this country because of their actions in the middle east. 

And as for you saying something about Israel, I don't see how you can side with a country that was formed from the lands Muslims have lived in for centuries and they form it without their consent or approval.   If the people who did 9/11 are terrorist, than the biggest terrorist is the United states of America and it's foreign policies.

Honestly, if you are going to make such a blatant claim, at least know what you're talking about first.  It makes you sound like a child.

I think you are just taking the chance without actually knowing, hoping that your claims about the Koran and muslim world-view are correct. They aren't.

Islam aims to submit both the individual and society under it. That's why it is a religious and political ideology (unlike christianity). The Koran is very clear about this and the works of Muhammad himself testify about it by being a military commander who conquered the whole Arabic peninsula, and his followers who conquered and submitted the whole Middle-East within the next 30 years. And within a century, muslims had already conquered Spain and tried to conquer Europe before the Franks stopped them. So they already did try to take over the world. Right from the beginning.

I never said or implied that muslims "want to kill everyone else who isn't Muslim". That's ridiculous. But islam aims to submit everybody under its rule, under islamic governance. You don't have to kill to do that.

The actions of the West do have some impact on muslim behaviour like I already stated, but it annoys me to see this blatant naivity (about islam and the islamic world) and self-hate (always blame the West).


Firstly, it's the "Qur'an".   And how can you tell me what Islam aims to do, when I'm postitive you never even read their holy book.  Ask any Muslim, nothing in the Qur'an demands that Muslims engage in the Islamization of the World by means of violence or other means.

"Islam aims to submit both the individual and society under it. " <---Not true in the slightest.   In a passage of the Qur'an it states, "Thou shall not force Islam upon peers or family".  So I think that right there debunks that.   Don't make such blatant claims about Religion, unless you're actually knowledgable in that field.

The only reason Islam is an policital-ideology is because people in the middle east have been following the Qur'an for so many centuries, that it would only make sense to base the policies on their Religion. 

I think it's fair to blaim the west.  What terrorist attacks have the Islamic world commited before we begun starting wars left and right with them?   This is common sense.  It's not self-hate, we aren't hating ourselves, we're simply just blaiming our goverment which is probably 99% responsible.

It is also "Koran" in English.

Why do you say "ask any muslim" when several deeply devoted muslims would say it's clear that muslims, even all muslims, are called to bring the world under islam?

Yes, the Koran is a very confusing book which contradicts itself in many many occasions. You quoted one peaceful passage, I can quote several others who counter your passage.

"The only reason islam is a political ideology" is not just because the ME has been under a continious dominance by islam (btw, christianity in the West has too, even longer than islam anywhere in the world), it is also because the Koran explicitly states it, unlike other world religions like bhuddism and christianity who are of personal and religious nature and not societal or political.

"Our government is 99% responsible" for muslim terror attacks in the West, wow, I'll let that speak for itself.

Even if Muslims try to spread their Religion, it doesn't say they are suppose to force it upon others.   There were Christian Mercenaries, but does that mean they used violence to spread their beliefs to all corners of the World?  No. The same thing is with Islam.  Some Muslims just go the wrong way about it.  So I'd say "Hate the player, not the game."

I wouldn't say the Qu'ran contradicts itself much at all.   More than that, there are lots of knowledges and prophecies in that book that came to light later, which people in the time period had zero ways of knowing.

And yes, you're right the West has been under the influence of Christianity for a while, but if you can't already tell, people are no where near as religious as they used to be in most places in the west.  Islam on the other hand remained united under their single ruler  for centuries, up untill about 100 years ago.  

Also, I don't think it states to go to means of violence or subjugation to spread their beliefs.    I mean murdering and torture is a sin in Islam, regardless of context.  (To a lesser degree)

I'd like to know why you think it's someone else's fault and not the USA's for the terrorist attacks.   They've had their hand in the hornets nest for a long time.



3DS I.D : 3282-2755-4646

I make bad threads.  

SSB really went downhill after Melee....

Manlet Crew

The US government has blood on its hands and must accept part responsibility for allowing the Boston bombings. Once again the failures of the ineffective government agencies: FBI and CIA were ineffective in preventing the bombings. The older bomber who masterminded the Boston bombings was on the terrorist database and he should have been locked up securely in a maximum security prison.

An ineffective way of reducing Muslim terrorist activity would be to assume all Muslims are terrorists. It would be up to the invdividual Muslims to prove to socety they are not terrorists and no risk to society. How many more  lives have to be lost at the hands of weak politically correct ineffective government policies that enable Muslims to organise and carry out acts of terrorism?



Around the Network
Slimebeast said:
ToraTiger said:
Slimebeast said:
ToraTiger said:
Slimebeast said:

Unlike many other religions it is built into islam to conquer the world and submit the unbelievers. I think that is key here.

The muslims tried to conquer Europe as early as in the 8th century until the Franks stopped them. To constantly blame Western world atrocities as a cause for muslim aggression is naive and an expression of self-hate.

What should be done?

Try to stay out the Middle East to not aggravate islamists more than necessary. But I think it was right to invade Afghanistan after 9/11 to stop Al-Qaeda and it's certainly right that the US defends and supports Israel.

Stop funding Saudi-Arabia, Egypt and whatnot.

Restrict immigration from islamic countries to the West. Do not let muslims build mosques with tall minarets or call to prayer in Europe, and don't give them special rights that threaten the democratic prinicples of the West.

Try to decrease oil dependancy of OPEC.

Not true at all.  There's nothing in the Islam holy book that states to kill or provoke non-beilevers in any way. 

Now you don't say anything about how the Christians tried to do the same thing, but that behaviour isn't the way of the Bible, either.  It's the indiviuals that caused that, not the religion.  To think that is ludacris.   If they really wanted to conquer the World, don't you think they would have tried that by now?  And can you please clarify why do you think they want to kill everyone else who isn't Muslim?

It's not naive to think it's the West's fault, because it probably is.  We've been involved in so many wars in the middle east over the course of the last three decades, it's ridiculous.  It might be for oil.

Actually, I think the terrorist attacks on the US is a direct result of the hate that some Muslims have for this country because of their actions in the middle east. 

And as for you saying something about Israel, I don't see how you can side with a country that was formed from the lands Muslims have lived in for centuries and they form it without their consent or approval.   If the people who did 9/11 are terrorist, than the biggest terrorist is the United states of America and it's foreign policies.

Honestly, if you are going to make such a blatant claim, at least know what you're talking about first.  It makes you sound like a child.

I think you are just taking the chance without actually knowing, hoping that your claims about the Koran and muslim world-view are correct. They aren't.

Islam aims to submit both the individual and society under it. That's why it is a religious and political ideology (unlike christianity). The Koran is very clear about this and the works of Muhammad himself testify about it by being a military commander who conquered the whole Arabic peninsula, and his followers who conquered and submitted the whole Middle-East within the next 30 years. And within a century, muslims had already conquered Spain and tried to conquer Europe before the Franks stopped them. So they already did try to take over the world. Right from the beginning.

I never said or implied that muslims "want to kill everyone else who isn't Muslim". That's ridiculous. But islam aims to submit everybody under its rule, under islamic governance. You don't have to kill to do that.

The actions of the West do have some impact on muslim behaviour like I already stated, but it annoys me to see this blatant naivity (about islam and the islamic world) and self-hate (always blame the West).


Firstly, it's the "Qur'an".   And how can you tell me what Islam aims to do, when I'm postitive you never even read their holy book.  Ask any Muslim, nothing in the Qur'an demands that Muslims engage in the Islamization of the World by means of violence or other means.

"Islam aims to submit both the individual and society under it. " <---Not true in the slightest.   In a passage of the Qur'an it states, "Thou shall not force Islam upon peers or family".  So I think that right there debunks that.   Don't make such blatant claims about Religion, unless you're actually knowledgable in that field.

The only reason Islam is an policital-ideology is because people in the middle east have been following the Qur'an for so many centuries, that it would only make sense to base the policies on their Religion. 

I think it's fair to blaim the west.  What terrorist attacks have the Islamic world commited before we begun starting wars left and right with them?   This is common sense.  It's not self-hate, we aren't hating ourselves, we're simply just blaiming our goverment which is probably 99% responsible.

It is also "Koran" in English.

Why do you say "ask any muslim" when several deeply devoted muslims would say it's clear that muslims, even all muslims, are called to bring the world under islam?

Yes, the Koran is a very confusing book which contradicts itself in many many occasions. You quoted one peaceful passage, I can quote several others who counter your passage.

"The only reason islam is a political ideology" is not just because the ME has been under a continious dominance by islam (btw, christianity in the West has too, even longer than islam anywhere in the world), it is also because the Koran explicitly states it, unlike other world religions like bhuddism and christianity who are of personal and religious nature and not societal or political.

"Our government is 99% responsible" for muslim terror attacks in the West, wow, I'll let that speak for itself.

Well I am muslim. I confirm that you are wrong, as any bigoted racist can be.

Nowhere in the Qu'ran does it says any of what you say, which is obvious for those who read it or those with common sense who are not susceptible to propaganda.

You are. And you just repeat shit you've read on the Internet, which makes you one of those gullible person that you could endocrinate in any racist extremist movement be it the KKK, the Tea Party, the Nazis or else.



Badassbab said:

 

Why do you say "ask any muslim" when several deeply devoted muslims would say it's clear that muslims, even all muslims, are called to bring the world under islam?

Yes, the Koran is a very confusing book which contradicts itself in many many occasions. You quoted one peaceful passage, I can quote several others who counter your passage.

"The only reason islam is a political ideology" is not just because the ME has been under a continious dominance by islam (btw, christianity in the West has too, even longer than islam anywhere in the world), it is also because the Koran explicitly states it, unlike other world religions like bhuddism and christianity who are of personal and religious nature and not societal or political.

"Our government is 99% responsible" for muslim terror attacks in the West, wow, I'll let that speak for itself.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/6120373/Top-10-worst-Bible-passages.html 

Christianity is political too and has canon law. Difference is compared to Islam, no country has adopted it and the main centres of Christianity are now secular with a clear seperation of Church and State and strong humanist elements in society to keep religious influence minimal. If say Europe adopted Christian laws then it wouldn't be much different from Muslim countries with Sharia. Muhammed basically copied Judeo-Christian religion and 'Arabized' it, he didn't just invent stoning to death for adultery, such punishments were nicked from the Bible.

I love reading these very partial sites but with irrefutable evidence http://www.evilbible.com/ http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

Those 10 worst bible passages, most of that doesn't apply to christianity. Most of those 10 come from the Old Testament, very very cruel things that God allowed/commanded the Jews to do in a specific context and in a limited period of time in order to fulfill the plan that God had for the Jewish people.

The only problematic passages on that list are the New Testament statements by the apostle Paul. But Paul was an erroneus human, his words have much less authority than the teachings of Jesus (he was clearly inspired though and is undoubtedly very important for christian doctrine). Therefore most modern day christians over-rule Paul's statements about the role of women.

Christianity is not a political ideology (but it can have political implications, since modern day democracy assumes influence from all members of society, including the religious, and this fact can become problematic where christian voters are in the majority). Christian teachings only apply on individuals and the christian community, not on the societal community. It doesn't claim any authority over society whatsoever! But throughout history christianity has been distorted into something explicitly political by people, but those are mainly perversions or grave misunderstandings.

There is a huge essential difference between christianity and islam. Islam explicitly is political, just like judaism. Islam and judaism both promote a theocracy. Christianity is not political and does not promote theocracy.



Dark_Lord_2008 said:

The US government has blood on its hands and must accept part responsibility for allowing the Boston bombings. Once again the failures of the ineffective government agencies: FBI and CIA were ineffective in preventing the bombings. The older bomber who masterminded the Boston bombings was on the terrorist database and he should have been locked up securely in a maximum security prison.

An ineffective way of reducing Muslim terrorist activity would be to assume all Muslims are terrorists. It would be up to the invdividual Muslims to prove to socety they are not terrorists and no risk to society. How many more  lives have to be lost at the hands of weak politically correct ineffective government policies that enable Muslims to organise and carry out acts of terrorism?

Yes, pigeon-holing 4 million people based on three crimes.  Makes a lot of sense.



3DS I.D : 3282-2755-4646

I make bad threads.  

SSB really went downhill after Melee....

Manlet Crew

Slimebeast said:
Badassbab said:

 

Why do you say "ask any muslim" when several deeply devoted muslims would say it's clear that muslims, even all muslims, are called to bring the world under islam?

Yes, the Koran is a very confusing book which contradicts itself in many many occasions. You quoted one peaceful passage, I can quote several others who counter your passage.

"The only reason islam is a political ideology" is not just because the ME has been under a continious dominance by islam (btw, christianity in the West has too, even longer than islam anywhere in the world), it is also because the Koran explicitly states it, unlike other world religions like bhuddism and christianity who are of personal and religious nature and not societal or political.

"Our government is 99% responsible" for muslim terror attacks in the West, wow, I'll let that speak for itself.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/6120373/Top-10-worst-Bible-passages.html 

Christianity is political too and has canon law. Difference is compared to Islam, no country has adopted it and the main centres of Christianity are now secular with a clear seperation of Church and State and strong humanist elements in society to keep religious influence minimal. If say Europe adopted Christian laws then it wouldn't be much different from Muslim countries with Sharia. Muhammed basically copied Judeo-Christian religion and 'Arabized' it, he didn't just invent stoning to death for adultery, such punishments were nicked from the Bible.

I love reading these very partial sites but with irrefutable evidence http://www.evilbible.com/ http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

Those 10 worst bible passages, most of that doesn't apply to christianity. Most of those 10 come from the Old Testament, very very cruel things that God allowed/commanded the Jews to do in a specific context and in a limited period of time in order to fulfill the plan that God had for the Jewish people.

The only problematic passages on that list are the New Testament statements by the apostle Paul. But Paul was an erroneus human, his words have much less authority than the teachings of Jesus (he was clearly inspired though and is undoubtedly very important for christian doctrine). Therefore most modern day christians over-rule Paul's statements about the role of women.

Christianity is not a political ideology (but it can have political implications, since modern day democracy assumes influence from all members of society, including the religious, and this fact can become problematic where christian voters are in the majority). Christian teachings only apply on individuals and the christian community, not on the societal community. It doesn't claim any authority over society whatsoever! But throughout history christianity has been distorted into something explicitly political by people, but those are mainly perversions or grave misunderstandings.

There is a huge essential difference between christianity and islam. Islam explicitly is political, just like judaism. Islam and judaism both promote a theocracy. Christianity is not political and does not promote theocracy.

Old Testament is still part of Christianity though? Christians worship the same God right? The God that spoke to Jesus also spoke to Moses? Didn't Jesus command his followers to follow the laws laid down in the Old Testament? http://carm.org/questions/about-jesus/what-did-jesus-teach-about-old-testament

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TasoRGeDHCc <<<<How a society based on the Old Testament would look. You think Islam is bad? You ain't seen nothing yet.



It should be up to the individual Muslims to prove they are not terrorists. Governments need to crack down on Muslims and stop playing the ineffective political correctness card. Muslims should all be micro-chipped and tracked 24/7 by the government. Only the terrorists would object to a policy that keeps us all safe.