By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - New H7N9 virus could pose global threat

This takes me back to the pig flu and the real deal that was the 2003 SARS epidemic.

Amazing how much turmoil these nanoscopic lifeforms can do.



 

 

 

 

 

Around the Network
JEMC said:
curl-6 said:
JEMC said:
I'm really in two minds about this.

This "bird/pig/whatever flu" alarms have been appearing during the last 3-4 years, and since they are more lethal than regular viruses it's worrying. But since these ills appears in remote locations it's hard to know if they are old illness that were confused with the seasonal flu or are something really new.

Flu viruses have a very high mutation rate, that's why new ones emerge so often.

There is the possibility that what we're seeing are only the worse cases, that most of those infected are so mild they're not even being detected, and that the kill rate is in actuality far lower than it appears at present. Let's hope so.

The worrying part is that its apparently more efficient at infecting people than other avian flus. That could hint that its a shorter step for it to go from a bird disease to one that can transfer between people.

I also hope that it is a one of those cases where it looks worse than it actually is.

The thing is, besides the pig flu that happened in America (I think), all of these rare flus have happened in China, where pollution and selling infected food are known problems. I don't know if those things as well as the possibility of using drugs on the animals are factors that are making these ills stronger/worse than they should be, it's the population that is weaker or (more probably) both things making it look worse.

In China, and otehr East Asian countries, large populations of humans, birds, and pigs live in close contact with each other. This facilitates both the transfer of bird viruses to people, but the mixing of bird and human strains in pigs, which can result in a mutant hybrid combining the high lethality of an avian flu with the high transmissibility of human flu.



curl-6 said:
JEMC said:

I also hope that it is a one of those cases where it looks worse than it actually is.

The thing is, besides the pig flu that happened in America (I think), all of these rare flus have happened in China, where pollution and selling infected food are known problems. I don't know if those things as well as the possibility of using drugs on the animals are factors that are making these ills stronger/worse than they should be, it's the population that is weaker or (more probably) both things making it look worse.

In China, and otehr East Asian countries, large populations of humans, birds, and pigs live in close contact with each other. This facilitates both the transfer of bird viruses to people, but the mixing of bird and human strains in pigs, which can result in a mutant hybrid combining the high lethality of an avian flu with the high transmissibility of human flu.

The same happened in Europe 300/400 years ago and there was no flu... we had plague(s), but no flu.

In any case, these cases are still far from being the next Spanish flu, otherwise we would be already ill and maybe death. Worringly enough, the Spanish flu (also from the H1N1 variant) may also started with birds and pigs, and in China...



Please excuse my bad English.

Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

JEMC said:
curl-6 said:
JEMC said:

I also hope that it is a one of those cases where it looks worse than it actually is.

The thing is, besides the pig flu that happened in America (I think), all of these rare flus have happened in China, where pollution and selling infected food are known problems. I don't know if those things as well as the possibility of using drugs on the animals are factors that are making these ills stronger/worse than they should be, it's the population that is weaker or (more probably) both things making it look worse.

In China, and otehr East Asian countries, large populations of humans, birds, and pigs live in close contact with each other. This facilitates both the transfer of bird viruses to people, but the mixing of bird and human strains in pigs, which can result in a mutant hybrid combining the high lethality of an avian flu with the high transmissibility of human flu.

The same happened in Europe 300/400 years ago and there was no flu... we had plague(s), but no flu.

In any case, these cases are still far from being the next Spanish flu, otherwise we would be already ill and maybe death. Worringly enough, the Spanish flu (also from the H1N1 variant) may also started with birds and pigs, and in China...

There was plenty of flu in Europe back then. The plague spread for the same reason; close contact allowing an animal disease to jump to people.

It's hard to judge against the Spanish Flu in terms of mortality because we don't have a good idea of its mortality yet; it seems very high but that might be because the mild cases are going unreported. The Spanish Flu had a 10-20% kill rate. (And is credited with wiping out 3-6% of the human population) What we can say is that H7N9 has so far not shown the ability to spread between people easily like the Spanish Flu could. (Though it's already better at infecting people than other bird flus)



Is 11 deaths and 43 infections really a case to start throwing out "pandemic" alerts? Seriously? In a country as populated as China and they only have that many cases so far? The regular seasonal flu probably kills thousands more than that each year in China alone...

I think our society/media/government use these things as scare tactics. Bird Flu, Swine Flu, all those major "pandemic" flus in the last 10 years have had no major outbreak or affect like our governments/media tried to make it out to be.



Around the Network
nightsurge said:
Is 11 deaths and 43 infections really a case to start throwing out "pandemic" alerts? Seriously? In a country as populated as China and they only have that many cases so far? The regular seasonal flu probably kills thousands more than that each year in China alone...

I think our society/media/government use these things as scare tactics. Bird Flu, Swine Flu, all those major "pandemic" flus in the last 10 years have had no major outbreak or affect like our governments/media tried to make it out to be.

There's no pandemic alert, just a warning that this bears keeping a close eye on. The number of deaths and infections isn't the problem, the problem is that the mortality rate seems very high, the virus is better suited to infecting people than other avian flus, and birds can carry it without appearing ill. It may very well never become a pandemic, but it's better to err on the side of caution with so much at stake.

What's the alternative, that we aren't informed of possible threats?



Enough of this alarmist nonsense already.

Ebola virus, SARS virus, swine flu and now a duck flu (again).

You can only cry wolf so many times.



sethnintendo said:
Wright said:
pezus said:
Holy shit. The "epidemiologist" here (or whatever it's called) just mentioned this to me 2 days ago, ahead of this report, when I had to visit him for a list of HIV infected individuals in Iceland. Guess he wasn't lying


What were you doing looking for a list of HIV infected individuals in Iceland?



He has to make sure he didn't man whore it out to one of these individuals. Actually, I heard they were making a sequel to the movie Kids in Iceland.


I know your joking, but you don't understand how interesting that would be. I spent my middle school years there. Cold climate long days and a bunch a kids with nothing to do. Interesting things do happen.



Slimebeast said:

Enough of this alarmist nonsense already.

Ebola virus, SARS virus, swine flu and now a duck flu (again).

You can only cry wolf so many times.

You never know when its doing to be the real thing though. Better to be told when there's a possibility than to find out once a pandemic has begun that, "oh, hey guys, there's a pandemic already on the go. We could have maybe prevented it by warning people to stay away from country x when we first found out about it, but we didn't want to alarm you." Covering up an outbreak is never a good idea.



curl-6 said:
Slimebeast said:

Enough of this alarmist nonsense already.

Ebola virus, SARS virus, swine flu and now a duck flu (again).

You can only cry wolf so many times.

You never know when its doing to be the real thing though. Better to be told when there's a possibility than to find out once a pandemic has begun that, "oh, hey guys, there's a pandemic already on the go. We could have maybe prevented it by warning people to stay away from country x when we first found out about it, but we didn't want to alarm you." Covering up an outbreak is never a good idea.

Did you already forget the swine flu mass hysteria?

Did you not notice the hyperbole in the article you quote?

"even more deadly", "Why experts are so worried", "it gets really worrisome", "more and more dangerous", "global concern", "particulary worrying", "severity and speed" "extremely resistant", "no vaccine".

That is mental rape. I want to vomit.

There's absolutely no proportions whatsoever in that article.