trollmaster85 said:
|
Otakumegane said:
You're saying Fable>Zelda?
|
Look at sales numbers above and tell me WHY Zelda > Fable today. And i dont want to hear answer similar to - Dah... Because it is Zelda, everybody knows it.
|
I actually don't know what Fable is.
But let's see here. You neglect the fact that while Skyward Sword sold less than Fable 3, Fable 3 was released around the height of 360 popularity and SS was released on a pretty much dead console, and OoT3D was released on 3DS a couple months back. You can only take so much of a series, this is similar to how NSMB2 was released 4 months before NSMBU and how bad of a decision that was.
Skyward Sword is also something I'd call one of the Zelda "black sheeps". Some people liked it, some people hated it. Motion controls weren't accepted by everyone. Reminds me of something....Fable:The Journey? And that sold a lot worse. I'd say that even killed the franchise for some.
Really, if you want to assess the value of the Zelda IP in terms of Sales you should be looking at Twilight Princess. It's the traditional "Zelda" game. Much like you're using Fable 3 instead of Fable:The Journey.
In fact, I'm willing to bet that the next mainline Zelda title will outsell the next main Fable title.
EDIT:Oh and I forgot. Skyward Sword requires a peripheral called Wii motion+. That adds about a $20 to the price.