By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - need for speed wiiu vs 360 video comparsion and pics

arcane_chaos on 30 March 2013

who cares??? it's Need for Speed, like people are breaking the bank for this game :p





trollolololololo!!!



Around the Network
ninjablade on 30 March 2013

look at how much the ;lighting looks here in the 360 version.

 

 



Play4Fun on 30 March 2013

Why do people still waste their time with this guy?



ninjablade on 30 March 2013
curl-6 said:
ninjablade said:
curl-6 said:
ninjablade said:
chris_wing said:
Well, guess I'll start a thread about how worm flavor ice cream is better then chocolate, you know since it's about preference and not any facts based on reality.


its funny how you can't post comparsion pics to prove your point, yes the wiiu version has some pc textures a very slight upgrade that you can't even see in direct feed pics

That you can't see. (Or can but refuse to acknowledge it)

I think most people would find the difference in reflections in these two pics quite noticeable. (Look at the road above of the yellow car folks, to where the 360 version has a blank space but the Wii U has reflections)


i noticed it now but your really grasping for straws if that makes that pic look better then the 360 version, i think the 360 version uses much color and lighting in that pic.

Oh, so it's grasping at straws to point out a clear technical difference, but its not to just say "but I like the (almost identical) colours better!"

How do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you behave this way?


i already said the game wins by a very small margin tech wise. but i prefer the 360 version.



curl-6 on 30 March 2013
ninjablade said:

look at how much the ;lighting looks here in the 360 version.

 

 

First of all, I don't agree, the 360 is higher contrast, but doesn't strike me as better or worse, but if you prefer it, I get that.

Secondly, the shadows show the Wii U one is slightly closer to sunset, so its not really a direct comparison.



Around the Network
ninjablade on 30 March 2013
dahuman said:
ninjablade said:
dahuman said:
ninjablade said:
that first pic with the yellow porch you can actually see the sign in the 360 version better then the wiiu, i'm talking about the last sign.


I'm surprised that you want to still talk about graphics when you don't know when motion blur is active or not, it's nothing short of amusing. It's also great that you argued with me using nothing but GAF, DF and Beyond3d without knowing what they were actually saying then now want to discredit DF by posting on a forum where you have 0 backing. You are a very smart person indeed haha.

I also don't know what planet you are from to think the night time picture's lighting is better and accurate on the 360 version unless you have really really good eyes where light is still present to you when things are supposed to be dark during the night, your examples are as usual, defying all logic, just like always, lol.....

Also funny how such a console is actually running it better as a first gen cycle game in mere 4 months after the original release even though it's supposed to be only on par with 7 year old hardware, unless you are trying to say that making video games are easy, which it's not BTW, just so we are clear. :P

its doesn't really work that way, consoles are just pc's in a closed box, they are easy to develope for, its not like the old days where consoles rivaled the most powerful pc, especially with the wiiu being very out tech interms of power.


It doesn't really work that way based on what?  Your imagination? But of course, why am I even replying to you when you don't know what night time looks like in normal humans' eyes? Silly me. I shall leave you be in your grand world of things are not supposed to be blurry when motion blur is in effect lol.

its the same time of day, i just read they made the wiiu version way darker so the lighting could show better.



ninjablade on 30 March 2013
curl-6 said:
ninjablade said:

look at how much the ;lighting looks here in the 360 version.

 

 

First of all, I don't agree, the 360 is higher contrast, but doesn't strike me as better or worse, but if you prefer it, I get that.

Secondly, the shadows show the Wii U one is slightly closer to sunset, so its not really a direct comparison.


all pics from df are suppose to be the sametime of day and time, but anyway we do nintendo fans feel the need to flame for staing a simple opinion, when really the pics proof how close they are, its very hard to notice a differnce, unlike the RDR difference which is very noticable.



ghost_of_fazz on 30 March 2013
ninjablade said:

am i the only one who notices the 360 has better lighting, and in the frame raste comparsion wiiu has more dips even though its more stable. which looks better to you from the video and pics. cutscenes look much better on 360 from the video

 

Yes, you are the only one



Viper1 on 30 March 2013

So you are proclaiming the X360 version to look better because you prefer the less accurate shadowing and lighting effects.

We got you now.



The rEVOLution is not being televised

ninjablade on 30 March 2013
Viper1 said:
So you are proclaiming the X360 version to look better because you prefer the less accurate shadowing and lighting effects.

We got you now.


where does it say that in the DF article, all they said was they made the wiiu version much darker, so the headlight are more pronounced, i'm just basing this off the video and picvs, the 360 lighting looks much better to me.