By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - need for speed wiiu vs 360 video comparsion and pics

ninjablade on 29 March 2013

that first pic with the yellow porch you can actually see the sign in the 360 version better then the wiiu, i'm talking about the last sign.



Around the Network
curl-6 on 30 March 2013
ninjablade said:
curl-6 said:
ninjablade said:
curl-6 said:
ninjablade said:
curl-6 said:
ninjablade said:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mf29-F2Nh88&list=UU9PBzalIcEQCsiIkq36PyUA&index=6 a am i the only one who notices the 360 has better lighting, and in the frame raste comparsion wiiu has more dips even though its more stable. which looks better to you from the video and pics. cutscenes look much better on 360 from the video/

 

Your denial is hilarious.

First it's "oh, wait for digital foundry," then when digital foundry proclaims the Wii U the winner, you go on a tirade about howthe 360 looks beter regardless.

Haven't you learned from your previous bans?

yes i said wait for the digitail foundry comparsison for pics and videos, even though i believe what digitail foundry says, i prefer the way the 360 version looks from the pics and videos, is this really hard to underrstand. i believe the wiiu version has some pc textures and a bot more of a stable framrate, thats the only note worthy thing in the article.
i

You consistenty put a negative slant on absolutely everything to do with Nintendo. There's a name for that kind of behaviour, one I'm not sure I'm allowed to say here.Why else would you make this thread, but to try to try to dampen a clear victory for the console, to irritate and antagonize people.

And the improved reflections are more noticeable than both; look ahead of the car in the top pic, the missing reflections on 360 are very noticeable.

can you please post therse comparsion pics that prove this very noticable differnce cause i'm trying hard to see it. for instants. the rdr pics , the differnce is clear.

 

You aleady provided the pics; your top two clearly shopwcase the Wii U's superior reflection draw distance. Just look ahead of the yellow car, you're blind if you can't see the glaring blankness on 360.

sorry i really don't see it, its really hard to notice, the second pic, the 360 version has much better lighting imo, thats noticeable., even in the video.

Yes, you do notice it. Anyone with functional eyesight can. You're just desperately clinging to your Wii U bashing agenda to the point where you'll play dumb.



chris_wing on 30 March 2013

Well, guess I'll start a thread about how worm flavor ice cream is better then chocolate, you know since it's about preference and not any facts based on reality.



ninjablade on 30 March 2013
chris_wing said:
Well, guess I'll start a thread about how worm flavor ice cream is better then chocolate, you know since it's about preference and not any facts based on reality.


its funny how you can't post comparsion pics to prove your point, yes the wiiu version has some pc textures a very slight upgrade that you can't even see in direct feed pics, the wiiu version wins i admit it, but the 360 has better use of colors , and lighting. based on the pics, its a very small upgrade which just further proves that wiiu is on par with current gen, no 1080p or 60 fps, no high resolution shadows, no aa. when the developers them selves said they are pushing the wiiu, to take advantage of the hardware



dahuman on 30 March 2013
ninjablade said:
that first pic with the yellow porch you can actually see the sign in the 360 version better then the wiiu, i'm talking about the last sign.


I'm surprised that you want to still talk about graphics when you don't know when motion blur is active or not, it's nothing short of amusing. It's also great that you argued with me using nothing but GAF, DF and Beyond3d without knowing what they were actually saying then now want to discredit DF by posting on a forum where you have 0 backing. You are a very smart person indeed haha.

I also don't know what planet you are from to think the night time picture's lighting is better and accurate on the 360 version unless you have really really good eyes where light is still present to you when things are supposed to be dark during the night, your examples are as usual, defying all logic, just like always, lol.....

Also funny how such a console is actually running it better as a first gen cycle game in mere 4 months after the original release even though it's supposed to be only on par with 7 year old hardware, unless you are trying to say that making video games are easy, which it's not BTW, just so we are clear. :P



Around the Network
curl-6 on 30 March 2013
ninjablade said:
chris_wing said:
Well, guess I'll start a thread about how worm flavor ice cream is better then chocolate, you know since it's about preference and not any facts based on reality.


its funny how you can't post comparsion pics to prove your point, yes the wiiu version has some pc textures a very slight upgrade that you can't even see in direct feed pics

That you can't see. (Or can but refuse to acknowledge it)

I think most people would find the difference in reflections in these two pics quite noticeable. (Look at the road above of the yellow car folks, to where the 360 version has a blank space but the Wii U has reflections)



ninjablade on 30 March 2013
dahuman said:
ninjablade said:
that first pic with the yellow porch you can actually see the sign in the 360 version better then the wiiu, i'm talking about the last sign.


I'm surprised that you want to still talk about graphics when you don't know when motion blur is active or not, it's nothing short of amusing. It's also great that you argued with me using nothing but GAF, DF and Beyond3d without knowing what they were actually saying then now want to discredit DF by posting on a forum where you have 0 backing. You are a very smart person indeed haha.

I also don't know what planet you are from to think the night time picture's lighting is better and accurate on the 360 version unless you have really really good eyes where light is still present to you when things are supposed to be dark during the night, your examples are as usual, defying all logic, just like always, lol.....

Also funny how such a console is actually running it better as a first gen cycle game in mere 4 months after the original release even though it's supposed to be only on par with 7 year old hardware, unless you are trying to say that making video games are easy, which it's not BTW, just so we are clear. :P

its doesn't really work that way, consoles are just pc's in a closed box, they are easy to develope for, its not like the old days where consoles rivaled the most powerful pc, especially with the wiiu being very out tech interms of power.



ninjablade on 30 March 2013
curl-6 said:
ninjablade said:
chris_wing said:
Well, guess I'll start a thread about how worm flavor ice cream is better then chocolate, you know since it's about preference and not any facts based on reality.


its funny how you can't post comparsion pics to prove your point, yes the wiiu version has some pc textures a very slight upgrade that you can't even see in direct feed pics

That you can't see. (Or can but refuse to acknowledge it)

I think most people would find the difference in reflections in these two pics quite noticeable. (Look at the road above of the yellow car folks, to where the 360 version has a blank space but the Wii U has reflections)


i noticed it now but your really grasping for straws if that makes that pic look better then the 360 version, i think the 360 version uses much color and lighting in that pic.



dahuman on 30 March 2013
ninjablade said:
dahuman said:
ninjablade said:
that first pic with the yellow porch you can actually see the sign in the 360 version better then the wiiu, i'm talking about the last sign.


I'm surprised that you want to still talk about graphics when you don't know when motion blur is active or not, it's nothing short of amusing. It's also great that you argued with me using nothing but GAF, DF and Beyond3d without knowing what they were actually saying then now want to discredit DF by posting on a forum where you have 0 backing. You are a very smart person indeed haha.

I also don't know what planet you are from to think the night time picture's lighting is better and accurate on the 360 version unless you have really really good eyes where light is still present to you when things are supposed to be dark during the night, your examples are as usual, defying all logic, just like always, lol.....

Also funny how such a console is actually running it better as a first gen cycle game in mere 4 months after the original release even though it's supposed to be only on par with 7 year old hardware, unless you are trying to say that making video games are easy, which it's not BTW, just so we are clear. :P

its doesn't really work that way, consoles are just pc's in a closed box, they are easy to develope for, its not like the old days where consoles rivaled the most powerful pc, especially with the wiiu being very out tech interms of power.


It doesn't really work that way based on what?  Your imagination? But of course, why am I even replying to you when you don't know what night time looks like in normal humans' eyes? Silly me. I shall leave you be in your grand world of things are not supposed to be blurry when motion blur is in effect lol.



curl-6 on 30 March 2013
ninjablade said:
curl-6 said:
ninjablade said:
chris_wing said:
Well, guess I'll start a thread about how worm flavor ice cream is better then chocolate, you know since it's about preference and not any facts based on reality.


its funny how you can't post comparsion pics to prove your point, yes the wiiu version has some pc textures a very slight upgrade that you can't even see in direct feed pics

That you can't see. (Or can but refuse to acknowledge it)

I think most people would find the difference in reflections in these two pics quite noticeable. (Look at the road above of the yellow car folks, to where the 360 version has a blank space but the Wii U has reflections)


i noticed it now but your really grasping for straws if that makes that pic look better then the 360 version, i think the 360 version uses much color and lighting in that pic.

Oh, so it's grasping at straws to point out a clear technical difference, but its not to just say "but I like the (almost identical) colours better!"

How do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you behave this way?