By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Need for Speed MW U "Graphics seem slightly worse compared to other versions"

oldschoolfool on 29 March 2013

at least it's on the dam system.



Around the Network
painmaster212 on 29 March 2013

You cant judge a console by its first few games anyways i mean dont we remember what the first set of games on the 360 and PS3 looked like? By their midcycle it was like we was playing an whole new console with what developers brought out in the software.

If the Wii U gets this much hate around here i can just imaging if the PS4 even has 1 game that looks worse then the current gen or on par what hate its gonna get or if the sales are subpar.



ryuzaki57 on 29 March 2013
Sh1nn said:

From gamingtrend review

http://gamingtrend.com/game_reviews/a-second-place-finish-need-for-speed-most-wanted-u-review/#/vanilla/discussion/embed/?vanilla_discussion_id=0

Sadly, the graphics do this well enough on their own. While not terrible by any means (and it’s impressive that the game runs as smoothly as it does on both the TV and the Gamepad), certain concessions were made to get it to play as well as it does. Namely, textures are far less crisp, and aliasing problems are far more noticeable than its other console counterparts.

Hardly surprising. The WiiU lacks bandwith for proper anti-aliasing. It was already the case in Ninja Gaiden Razor's Edge : I tried the WiiU version at a gameshow and the PS3 demo is definitely cleaner in that departement. Razor's Edge might actually have been lead-developed on PS360, those versions being put on hold during the exclusivity timeframe.



 

Blog -> https://ryuz4ki57inenglish.wordpress.com/

curl-6 on 29 March 2013
ryuzaki57 said:
Sh1nn said:

From gamingtrend review

http://gamingtrend.com/game_reviews/a-second-place-finish-need-for-speed-most-wanted-u-review/#/vanilla/discussion/embed/?vanilla_discussion_id=0

Sadly, the graphics do this well enough on their own. While not terrible by any means (and it’s impressive that the game runs as smoothly as it does on both the TV and the Gamepad), certain concessions were made to get it to play as well as it does. Namely, textures are far less crisp, and aliasing problems are far more noticeable than its other console counterparts.

Hardly surprising. The WiiU lacks bandwith for proper anti-aliasing. It was already the case in Ninja Gaiden Razor's Edge : I tried the WiiU version at a gameshow and the PS3 demo is definitely cleaner in that departement. Razor's Edge might actually have been lead-developed on PS360, those versions being put on hold during the exclusivity timeframe.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=157824&page=1#

Digital Foundry ruled the resolution and anti-aliasing quality equal to the PS3/360 versions.



Darc Requiem on 30 March 2013
curl-6 said:
ryuzaki57 said:
Sh1nn said:

From gamingtrend review

http://gamingtrend.com/game_reviews/a-second-place-finish-need-for-speed-most-wanted-u-review/#/vanilla/discussion/embed/?vanilla_discussion_id=0

Sadly, the graphics do this well enough on their own. While not terrible by any means (and it’s impressive that the game runs as smoothly as it does on both the TV and the Gamepad), certain concessions were made to get it to play as well as it does. Namely, textures are far less crisp, and aliasing problems are far more noticeable than its other console counterparts.

Hardly surprising. The WiiU lacks bandwith for proper anti-aliasing. It was already the case in Ninja Gaiden Razor's Edge : I tried the WiiU version at a gameshow and the PS3 demo is definitely cleaner in that departement. Razor's Edge might actually have been lead-developed on PS360, those versions being put on hold during the exclusivity timeframe.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=157824&page=1#

Digital Foundry ruled the resolution and anti-aliasing quality equal to the PS3/360 versions.

You are wasting your time. He's a Nintentroll. If there is any negative angle to be found. He'll post it.

~Mod Edit~

This post has been moderated.

-Smeags



Around the Network
curl-6 on 30 March 2013
Darc Requiem said:
curl-6 said:
ryuzaki57 said:
Sh1nn said:

From gamingtrend review

http://gamingtrend.com/game_reviews/a-second-place-finish-need-for-speed-most-wanted-u-review/#/vanilla/discussion/embed/?vanilla_discussion_id=0

Sadly, the graphics do this well enough on their own. While not terrible by any means (and it’s impressive that the game runs as smoothly as it does on both the TV and the Gamepad), certain concessions were made to get it to play as well as it does. Namely, textures are far less crisp, and aliasing problems are far more noticeable than its other console counterparts.

Hardly surprising. The WiiU lacks bandwith for proper anti-aliasing. It was already the case in Ninja Gaiden Razor's Edge : I tried the WiiU version at a gameshow and the PS3 demo is definitely cleaner in that departement. Razor's Edge might actually have been lead-developed on PS360, those versions being put on hold during the exclusivity timeframe.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=157824&page=1#

Digital Foundry ruled the resolution and anti-aliasing quality equal to the PS3/360 versions.

You are wasting your time. He's a Nintentroll. If there is any negative angle to be found. He'll post it.

I've actually been wondering this; I know it's against forum rules to call someone a fanboy, but it is allowed to call someone a troll?



Darc Requiem on 30 March 2013

I'm not sure to be honest but it's the truth. I mean he was complaining about Nintendo moneyhatting Monster Hunter in another thread. A Sony fan complaining about Nintendo money hatting is like a Nintendo fan complaining about MS going after the casual market...



Viper1 on 30 March 2013
curl-6 said:

I've actually been wondering this; I know it's against forum rules to call someone a fanboy, but it is allowed to call someone a troll?

Don't use either.  Instead say...

Fanboy - Irrational fan.
Troll - Emotional retort elicitor.



The rEVOLution is not being televised

Darc Requiem on 30 March 2013
curl-6 said:
Darc Requiem said:
curl-6 said:
ryuzaki57 said:
Sh1nn said:

From gamingtrend review

http://gamingtrend.com/game_reviews/a-second-place-finish-need-for-speed-most-wanted-u-review/#/vanilla/discussion/embed/?vanilla_discussion_id=0

Sadly, the graphics do this well enough on their own. While not terrible by any means (and it’s impressive that the game runs as smoothly as it does on both the TV and the Gamepad), certain concessions were made to get it to play as well as it does. Namely, textures are far less crisp, and aliasing problems are far more noticeable than its other console counterparts.

Hardly surprising. The WiiU lacks bandwith for proper anti-aliasing. It was already the case in Ninja Gaiden Razor's Edge : I tried the WiiU version at a gameshow and the PS3 demo is definitely cleaner in that departement. Razor's Edge might actually have been lead-developed on PS360, those versions being put on hold during the exclusivity timeframe.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=157824&page=1#

Digital Foundry ruled the resolution and anti-aliasing quality equal to the PS3/360 versions.

You are wasting your time. He's a Nintentroll. If there is any negative angle to be found. He'll post it.

I've actually been wondering this; I know it's against forum rules to call someone a fanboy, but it is allowed to call someone a troll?

Considering that I just got only my second moderation warning in the 6 + years I've been on this forum. I'll be taking Viper1's advice.



curl-6 on 30 March 2013
Darc Requiem said:
curl-6 said:
Darc Requiem said:
curl-6 said:
ryuzaki57 said:
Sh1nn said:

From gamingtrend review

http://gamingtrend.com/game_reviews/a-second-place-finish-need-for-speed-most-wanted-u-review/#/vanilla/discussion/embed/?vanilla_discussion_id=0

Sadly, the graphics do this well enough on their own. While not terrible by any means (and it’s impressive that the game runs as smoothly as it does on both the TV and the Gamepad), certain concessions were made to get it to play as well as it does. Namely, textures are far less crisp, and aliasing problems are far more noticeable than its other console counterparts.

Hardly surprising. The WiiU lacks bandwith for proper anti-aliasing. It was already the case in Ninja Gaiden Razor's Edge : I tried the WiiU version at a gameshow and the PS3 demo is definitely cleaner in that departement. Razor's Edge might actually have been lead-developed on PS360, those versions being put on hold during the exclusivity timeframe.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=157824&page=1#

Digital Foundry ruled the resolution and anti-aliasing quality equal to the PS3/360 versions.

You are wasting your time. He's a Nintentroll. If there is any negative angle to be found. He'll post it.

I've actually been wondering this; I know it's against forum rules to call someone a fanboy, but it is allowed to call someone a troll?

Considering that I just got only my second moderation warning in the 6 + years I've been on this forum. I'll be taking Viper1's advice.

Off topic, but jeez, I just realized 2007 was 6 years ago. I feel old...