By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Xbox 720: EA & Microsoft to announce exclusivity deal at April reveal – rumour

D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:

Hynad said:

Why wouldn't they count?


You can count Fable: Journey if you want. This still won't change much. Lots of indies games on XBLA, but not that many first party titles.

Great i don't even know Kinect only have one game


That was an example. -__-

But ok. Feel free to mention them all. Go google a list and post it here. Couldn't be arsed to do it, since I kinda hoped you'd get the idea.  But nope, I was wrong.

How hard to do that when there is list in wiki?but look at your reply,if i post it all you will still say "meh that's nothing",right?Don't worry it's not first time people doing this.

It's actually not the first time someone, like yourself, tries to argue alone, trying to think and react for both himself AND the ones discussing the topics with him. ¬_¬

If that's all you have to offer for rebuke, then my point has not been invalidated.

That's you.

In the end,Sony had clearly more studios than MS in this gen and you still say it's not.

And why i need to offer when wiki already have list?

Plus why the hell you starting talking about this gen when the thread is about next gen?

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5169007

Don't tell me i start it first


Seriously... The point is that Microsoft had plenty of studios, yet they didn't pump out any games. They threw their money at third parties for irrelevant timed exclusivity. For gamers, that's not really good. Microsoft might have made people go to the 360 instead of the PS3 in the early days of the generation because of those business decisions (which is good), but in the end, that left the 360 with not that much to differentiate itself from the competition as far as content is concerned, since there were very few exclusive games. The last 2 years of the console have been really thin as far as exclusive games are concerned. And a lot of people jumped ship. 

If this really changes for the NextBox, and their newly created studios really create great and hopefully new experiences, it will be really great for us gamers. But until we get any tangible infos, some of these studios could have been built to create more Kinect centric casual stuff. I hipe that's not the case. Because if Microsoft can manage to ensemble other studios of the caliber of 343, but for entirely new IPs, their next platform will be really interesting to see grow and flourish. As was the case for Sony for the PS3.

Why can you type so much unture things?

Look at the sales after Kinect released,a lot of people jumped ship?more like a lot of people jumped in,and 2009 was the year of fewest exclusive games for 360,not 2011 or 2012

Just say you don't like MS whatever they do,as usual.


As usual? I usually don't like Microsoft, whatever they do? That's new.

You really have the poorest way to debate and discuss. ¬_¬

I guess no matter what, your beloved company can never do any wrong. -__-

But ok. Microsoft had the most first party games of any console during the last 2 years. It's like God himself made sure that core gamers would be in gaming heaven with so many titles that their wallets could never possibly keep up! *Am I doing it right, now? 

No matter what I saw during the last 2 years, with people going from one console to an other because they were starving... This is all just an illusion, because every single Halo and Gears players, in the end, were dreaming about playing games like Kinectimals. 



Around the Network

So some timed DLC for 1 or 2 EA games a year? And its Timed so the PS4 will still get them anyway......meh, sounds like its getting talked up big when it isn't, will your average consumer know of this? and will it swade them into getting a 720? I think not.



 

Check out my Youtube channel : http://www.youtube.com/user/ThePSXcollector

Hynad said:
D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:

Hynad said:

Why wouldn't they count?


You can count Fable: Journey if you want. This still won't change much. Lots of indies games on XBLA, but not that many first party titles.

Great i don't even know Kinect only have one game


That was an example. -__-

But ok. Feel free to mention them all. Go google a list and post it here. Couldn't be arsed to do it, since I kinda hoped you'd get the idea.  But nope, I was wrong.

How hard to do that when there is list in wiki?but look at your reply,if i post it all you will still say "meh that's nothing",right?Don't worry it's not first time people doing this.

It's actually not the first time someone, like yourself, tries to argue alone, trying to think and react for both himself AND the ones discussing the topics with him. ¬_¬

If that's all you have to offer for rebuke, then my point has not been invalidated.

That's you.

In the end,Sony had clearly more studios than MS in this gen and you still say it's not.

And why i need to offer when wiki already have list?

Plus why the hell you starting talking about this gen when the thread is about next gen?

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5169007

Don't tell me i start it first


Seriously... The point is that Microsoft had plenty of studios, yet they didn't pump out any games. They threw their money at third parties for irrelevant timed exclusivity. For gamers, that's not really good. Microsoft might have made people go to the 360 instead of the PS3 in the early days of the generation because of those business decisions (which is good), but in the end, that left the 360 with not that much to differentiate itself from the competition as far as content is concerned, since there were very few exclusive games. The last 2 years of the console have been really thin as far as exclusive games are concerned. And a lot of people jumped ship. 

If this really changes for the NextBox, and their newly created studios really create great and hopefully new experiences, it will be really great for us gamers. But until we get any tangible infos, some of these studios could have been built to create more Kinect centric casual stuff. I hipe that's not the case. Because if Microsoft can manage to ensemble other studios of the caliber of 343, but for entirely new IPs, their next platform will be really interesting to see grow and flourish. As was the case for Sony for the PS3.

Why can you type so much unture things?

Look at the sales after Kinect released,a lot of people jumped ship?more like a lot of people jumped in,and 2009 was the year of fewest exclusive games for 360,not 2011 or 2012

Just say you don't like MS whatever they do,as usual.


As usual? I usually don't like Microsoft, whatever they do? That's new.

You really have the poorest way to debate and discuss. ¬_¬

I guess no matter what, your beloved company can never do any wrong. -__-

But ok. Microsoft had the most first party games of any console during the last 2 years. It's like God himself made sure that core gamers would be in gaming heaven with so many titles that their wallets could never possibly keep up! *Am I doing it right, now? 

No matter what I saw during the last 2 years, with people going from one console to an other because they were starving... This is all just an illusion, because every single Halo and Gears players, in the end, were dreaming about playing games like Kinectimals. 

Great,i said it's less Studios than Sony in this gen,but not only had one or two(or fewest) exclusives at last 2 years from your reply,but suddnely become "Microsoft had the most first party games of any console during the last 2 years.",i guess you think you never wrong then.

And it's not me beloved company can never do any wrong,it's you believe MS always wrong,whatever they do,even doing nothing.

And no matter what you think,360 sales increased after 2010.

Btw do you think i'm not here right now you wait few hours later to reply?and keep using lame emoticons won't help you anything since you don't even check the info.



D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:

Hynad said:

Why wouldn't they count?


You can count Fable: Journey if you want. This still won't change much. Lots of indies games on XBLA, but not that many first party titles.

Great i don't even know Kinect only have one game


That was an example. -__-

But ok. Feel free to mention them all. Go google a list and post it here. Couldn't be arsed to do it, since I kinda hoped you'd get the idea.  But nope, I was wrong.

How hard to do that when there is list in wiki?but look at your reply,if i post it all you will still say "meh that's nothing",right?Don't worry it's not first time people doing this.

It's actually not the first time someone, like yourself, tries to argue alone, trying to think and react for both himself AND the ones discussing the topics with him. ¬_¬

If that's all you have to offer for rebuke, then my point has not been invalidated.

That's you.

In the end,Sony had clearly more studios than MS in this gen and you still say it's not.

And why i need to offer when wiki already have list?

Plus why the hell you starting talking about this gen when the thread is about next gen?

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5169007

Don't tell me i start it first


Seriously... The point is that Microsoft had plenty of studios, yet they didn't pump out any games. They threw their money at third parties for irrelevant timed exclusivity. For gamers, that's not really good. Microsoft might have made people go to the 360 instead of the PS3 in the early days of the generation because of those business decisions (which is good), but in the end, that left the 360 with not that much to differentiate itself from the competition as far as content is concerned, since there were very few exclusive games. The last 2 years of the console have been really thin as far as exclusive games are concerned. And a lot of people jumped ship. 

If this really changes for the NextBox, and their newly created studios really create great and hopefully new experiences, it will be really great for us gamers. But until we get any tangible infos, some of these studios could have been built to create more Kinect centric casual stuff. I hipe that's not the case. Because if Microsoft can manage to ensemble other studios of the caliber of 343, but for entirely new IPs, their next platform will be really interesting to see grow and flourish. As was the case for Sony for the PS3.

Why can you type so much unture things?

Look at the sales after Kinect released,a lot of people jumped ship?more like a lot of people jumped in,and 2009 was the year of fewest exclusive games for 360,not 2011 or 2012

Just say you don't like MS whatever they do,as usual.


As usual? I usually don't like Microsoft, whatever they do? That's new.

You really have the poorest way to debate and discuss. ¬_¬

I guess no matter what, your beloved company can never do any wrong. -__-

But ok. Microsoft had the most first party games of any console during the last 2 years. It's like God himself made sure that core gamers would be in gaming heaven with so many titles that their wallets could never possibly keep up! *Am I doing it right, now? 

No matter what I saw during the last 2 years, with people going from one console to an other because they were starving... This is all just an illusion, because every single Halo and Gears players, in the end, were dreaming about playing games like Kinectimals. 

Great,i said it's less than Sony in this gen and suddnely become "Microsoft had the most first party games of any console during the last 2 years.",i guess you think you never wrong then.

And it's not me beloved company can never do any wrong,it's you believe MS always wrong,whatever they do,even doing nothing.

And no matter what you think,360 sales increased after 2010.

Btw do you think i'm not here right now you you wait few hours later to reply?and keep using lame emoticons won't help you anything.

We are not talking about sales. Kinect did attract people from the casual market, sure. But I'm talking about core games. How Microsoft didn't use its workforce to produce more AAA games and support their core audience as a whole. If you didn't notice the outcry during the last 2 years about how Microsoft weren't supporting their original audience nearly as well as its competitors, I think it's due time for you to get out from under that rock of yours.

As for your claim that I believe Microsoft is always wrong... Either elaborate on that bullshit by coming up with example that illustrates my dislike of them, or just quit replying altogether. Unless you believe that liking something means you can never be critical about it, which would be ridiculous, I don't think you have any argument to support that claim of yours. 

But, it's ok. I already said you had that typical way of discussing matters that didn't align with your biased views. It's pretty widespread on the internet. But on VGC, people are usually expected to be more reasonable than that... But you'll try to mirror that again, without any ground to support it.



Hynad said:
D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:

Hynad said:

Why wouldn't they count?


You can count Fable: Journey if you want. This still won't change much. Lots of indies games on XBLA, but not that many first party titles.

Great i don't even know Kinect only have one game


That was an example. -__-

But ok. Feel free to mention them all. Go google a list and post it here. Couldn't be arsed to do it, since I kinda hoped you'd get the idea.  But nope, I was wrong.

How hard to do that when there is list in wiki?but look at your reply,if i post it all you will still say "meh that's nothing",right?Don't worry it's not first time people doing this.

It's actually not the first time someone, like yourself, tries to argue alone, trying to think and react for both himself AND the ones discussing the topics with him. ¬_¬

If that's all you have to offer for rebuke, then my point has not been invalidated.

That's you.

In the end,Sony had clearly more studios than MS in this gen and you still say it's not.

And why i need to offer when wiki already have list?

Plus why the hell you starting talking about this gen when the thread is about next gen?

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5169007

Don't tell me i start it first


Seriously... The point is that Microsoft had plenty of studios, yet they didn't pump out any games. They threw their money at third parties for irrelevant timed exclusivity. For gamers, that's not really good. Microsoft might have made people go to the 360 instead of the PS3 in the early days of the generation because of those business decisions (which is good), but in the end, that left the 360 with not that much to differentiate itself from the competition as far as content is concerned, since there were very few exclusive games. The last 2 years of the console have been really thin as far as exclusive games are concerned. And a lot of people jumped ship. 

If this really changes for the NextBox, and their newly created studios really create great and hopefully new experiences, it will be really great for us gamers. But until we get any tangible infos, some of these studios could have been built to create more Kinect centric casual stuff. I hipe that's not the case. Because if Microsoft can manage to ensemble other studios of the caliber of 343, but for entirely new IPs, their next platform will be really interesting to see grow and flourish. As was the case for Sony for the PS3.

Why can you type so much unture things?

Look at the sales after Kinect released,a lot of people jumped ship?more like a lot of people jumped in,and 2009 was the year of fewest exclusive games for 360,not 2011 or 2012

Just say you don't like MS whatever they do,as usual.


As usual? I usually don't like Microsoft, whatever they do? That's new.

You really have the poorest way to debate and discuss. ¬_¬

I guess no matter what, your beloved company can never do any wrong. -__-

But ok. Microsoft had the most first party games of any console during the last 2 years. It's like God himself made sure that core gamers would be in gaming heaven with so many titles that their wallets could never possibly keep up! *Am I doing it right, now? 

No matter what I saw during the last 2 years, with people going from one console to an other because they were starving... This is all just an illusion, because every single Halo and Gears players, in the end, were dreaming about playing games like Kinectimals. 

Great,i said it's less than Sony in this gen and suddnely become "Microsoft had the most first party games of any console during the last 2 years.",i guess you think you never wrong then.

And it's not me beloved company can never do any wrong,it's you believe MS always wrong,whatever they do,even doing nothing.

And no matter what you think,360 sales increased after 2010.

Btw do you think i'm not here right now you you wait few hours later to reply?and keep using lame emoticons won't help you anything.

We are not talking about sales. Kinect did attract a new market, sure. But I'm talking about core games. Support for their audience as a whole. If you didn't notice the outcry during the last 2 years about how Microsoft weren't supporting their original audience nearly as well as its competitors, I think it's due time for you to get out from under that rock of yours.

As for your claim that I believe Microsoft is always wrong... Either elaborate on that bullshit by coming up with example that illustrates my dislike of them, or just quit replying altogether. Unless you believe that liking something means you can never be critical about it. 

But, it's ok. I already said you had that typical way of discussing matters that didn't align with you biased views. It's pretty widespread on the internet. But on VGC, people are usually more reasonable than that...

But i am,sales is part of what i'm saying,i don't care how you and your friends feeling,sales increased,hater can STFU,that's it.

Core gamers?more like internet core games,spend 24/7 to comment how he hate this how he hate that,but don't play games,treat their lovely "core games" like fanboy weapons,not for fun.

And yes,it's very typical some person like you in forums,keep saying something biased but always think his they only one come with non-biased comments,like PS4,did you see me go Sony thread and start some trash talk?but you and your friends keep doing that.

I give you info,you give me nothing or some "feels" which i don't care.



Around the Network
D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:

Hynad said:

Why wouldn't they count?


You can count Fable: Journey if you want. This still won't change much. Lots of indies games on XBLA, but not that many first party titles.

Great i don't even know Kinect only have one game


That was an example. -__-

But ok. Feel free to mention them all. Go google a list and post it here. Couldn't be arsed to do it, since I kinda hoped you'd get the idea.  But nope, I was wrong.

How hard to do that when there is list in wiki?but look at your reply,if i post it all you will still say "meh that's nothing",right?Don't worry it's not first time people doing this.

It's actually not the first time someone, like yourself, tries to argue alone, trying to think and react for both himself AND the ones discussing the topics with him. ¬_¬

If that's all you have to offer for rebuke, then my point has not been invalidated.

That's you.

In the end,Sony had clearly more studios than MS in this gen and you still say it's not.

And why i need to offer when wiki already have list?

Plus why the hell you starting talking about this gen when the thread is about next gen?

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5169007

Don't tell me i start it first


Seriously... The point is that Microsoft had plenty of studios, yet they didn't pump out any games. They threw their money at third parties for irrelevant timed exclusivity. For gamers, that's not really good. Microsoft might have made people go to the 360 instead of the PS3 in the early days of the generation because of those business decisions (which is good), but in the end, that left the 360 with not that much to differentiate itself from the competition as far as content is concerned, since there were very few exclusive games. The last 2 years of the console have been really thin as far as exclusive games are concerned. And a lot of people jumped ship. 

If this really changes for the NextBox, and their newly created studios really create great and hopefully new experiences, it will be really great for us gamers. But until we get any tangible infos, some of these studios could have been built to create more Kinect centric casual stuff. I hipe that's not the case. Because if Microsoft can manage to ensemble other studios of the caliber of 343, but for entirely new IPs, their next platform will be really interesting to see grow and flourish. As was the case for Sony for the PS3.

Why can you type so much unture things?

Look at the sales after Kinect released,a lot of people jumped ship?more like a lot of people jumped in,and 2009 was the year of fewest exclusive games for 360,not 2011 or 2012

Just say you don't like MS whatever they do,as usual.


As usual? I usually don't like Microsoft, whatever they do? That's new.

You really have the poorest way to debate and discuss. ¬_¬

I guess no matter what, your beloved company can never do any wrong. -__-

But ok. Microsoft had the most first party games of any console during the last 2 years. It's like God himself made sure that core gamers would be in gaming heaven with so many titles that their wallets could never possibly keep up! *Am I doing it right, now? 

No matter what I saw during the last 2 years, with people going from one console to an other because they were starving... This is all just an illusion, because every single Halo and Gears players, in the end, were dreaming about playing games like Kinectimals. 

Great,i said it's less than Sony in this gen and suddnely become "Microsoft had the most first party games of any console during the last 2 years.",i guess you think you never wrong then.

And it's not me beloved company can never do any wrong,it's you believe MS always wrong,whatever they do,even doing nothing.

And no matter what you think,360 sales increased after 2010.

Btw do you think i'm not here right now you you wait few hours later to reply?and keep using lame emoticons won't help you anything.

We are not talking about sales. Kinect did attract a new market, sure. But I'm talking about core games. Support for their audience as a whole. If you didn't notice the outcry during the last 2 years about how Microsoft weren't supporting their original audience nearly as well as its competitors, I think it's due time for you to get out from under that rock of yours.

As for your claim that I believe Microsoft is always wrong... Either elaborate on that bullshit by coming up with example that illustrates my dislike of them, or just quit replying altogether. Unless you believe that liking something means you can never be critical about it. 

But, it's ok. I already said you had that typical way of discussing matters that didn't align with you biased views. It's pretty widespread on the internet. But on VGC, people are usually more reasonable than that...

But i am,sales is part of what i'm saying,i don't care how you and your friends feeling,sales increased,hater can STFU,that's it.

Core gamers?more like internet core games,spend 24/7 to comment how he hate this how he hate that,but don't play games,treat their lovely "core games" like fanboy weapons,not for fun.

And yes,it's very typical some person like you in forums,keep saying something biased but always think his they only one come with none-biased comments,like PS4,did you see me go Sony thread and start some trash talk?but you and your friends keep doing that.

I give you info,you give me nothing or some "feels" which i don't care.


So now, I'm a hater. Ha ha ha!!!

Whatever, you didn't provide anything substantial other than to express your unwavering love for Microsoft by suggesting through your diatribe that Microsoft can do no wrong, ever. Stay under that rock.

Obviously, a comment like this: "If this really changes for the NextBox, and their newly created studios really create great and hopefully new experiences, it will be really great for us gamers. But until we get any tangible infos, some of these studios could have been built to create more Kinect centric casual stuff. I hope that's not the case. Because if Microsoft can manage to ensemble other studios of the caliber of 343, but for entirely new IPs, their next platform will be really interesting to see grow and flourish. As was the case for Sony with the PS3."

Could only have been expressed by nothing but a hater. ¬_¬



Hynad said:
D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:
Hynad said:
D-Joe said:

Hynad said:

Why wouldn't they count?


You can count Fable: Journey if you want. This still won't change much. Lots of indies games on XBLA, but not that many first party titles.

Great i don't even know Kinect only have one game


That was an example. -__-

But ok. Feel free to mention them all. Go google a list and post it here. Couldn't be arsed to do it, since I kinda hoped you'd get the idea.  But nope, I was wrong.

How hard to do that when there is list in wiki?but look at your reply,if i post it all you will still say "meh that's nothing",right?Don't worry it's not first time people doing this.

It's actually not the first time someone, like yourself, tries to argue alone, trying to think and react for both himself AND the ones discussing the topics with him. ¬_¬

If that's all you have to offer for rebuke, then my point has not been invalidated.

That's you.

In the end,Sony had clearly more studios than MS in this gen and you still say it's not.

And why i need to offer when wiki already have list?

Plus why the hell you starting talking about this gen when the thread is about next gen?

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5169007

Don't tell me i start it first


Seriously... The point is that Microsoft had plenty of studios, yet they didn't pump out any games. They threw their money at third parties for irrelevant timed exclusivity. For gamers, that's not really good. Microsoft might have made people go to the 360 instead of the PS3 in the early days of the generation because of those business decisions (which is good), but in the end, that left the 360 with not that much to differentiate itself from the competition as far as content is concerned, since there were very few exclusive games. The last 2 years of the console have been really thin as far as exclusive games are concerned. And a lot of people jumped ship. 

If this really changes for the NextBox, and their newly created studios really create great and hopefully new experiences, it will be really great for us gamers. But until we get any tangible infos, some of these studios could have been built to create more Kinect centric casual stuff. I hipe that's not the case. Because if Microsoft can manage to ensemble other studios of the caliber of 343, but for entirely new IPs, their next platform will be really interesting to see grow and flourish. As was the case for Sony for the PS3.

Why can you type so much unture things?

Look at the sales after Kinect released,a lot of people jumped ship?more like a lot of people jumped in,and 2009 was the year of fewest exclusive games for 360,not 2011 or 2012

Just say you don't like MS whatever they do,as usual.


As usual? I usually don't like Microsoft, whatever they do? That's new.

You really have the poorest way to debate and discuss. ¬_¬

I guess no matter what, your beloved company can never do any wrong. -__-

But ok. Microsoft had the most first party games of any console during the last 2 years. It's like God himself made sure that core gamers would be in gaming heaven with so many titles that their wallets could never possibly keep up! *Am I doing it right, now? 

No matter what I saw during the last 2 years, with people going from one console to an other because they were starving... This is all just an illusion, because every single Halo and Gears players, in the end, were dreaming about playing games like Kinectimals. 

Great,i said it's less than Sony in this gen and suddnely become "Microsoft had the most first party games of any console during the last 2 years.",i guess you think you never wrong then.

And it's not me beloved company can never do any wrong,it's you believe MS always wrong,whatever they do,even doing nothing.

And no matter what you think,360 sales increased after 2010.

Btw do you think i'm not here right now you you wait few hours later to reply?and keep using lame emoticons won't help you anything.

We are not talking about sales. Kinect did attract a new market, sure. But I'm talking about core games. Support for their audience as a whole. If you didn't notice the outcry during the last 2 years about how Microsoft weren't supporting their original audience nearly as well as its competitors, I think it's due time for you to get out from under that rock of yours.

As for your claim that I believe Microsoft is always wrong... Either elaborate on that bullshit by coming up with example that illustrates my dislike of them, or just quit replying altogether. Unless you believe that liking something means you can never be critical about it. 

But, it's ok. I already said you had that typical way of discussing matters that didn't align with you biased views. It's pretty widespread on the internet. But on VGC, people are usually more reasonable than that...

But i am,sales is part of what i'm saying,i don't care how you and your friends feeling,sales increased,hater can STFU,that's it.

Core gamers?more like internet core games,spend 24/7 to comment how he hate this how he hate that,but don't play games,treat their lovely "core games" like fanboy weapons,not for fun.

And yes,it's very typical some person like you in forums,keep saying something biased but always think his they only one come with none-biased comments,like PS4,did you see me go Sony thread and start some trash talk?but you and your friends keep doing that.

I give you info,you give me nothing or some "feels" which i don't care.


So now, I'm a hater. Ha ha ha!!!

Whatever, you didn't provide anything substantial other than to express your unwavering love for Microsoft by suggesting through your diatribe that Microsoft can do no wrong, ever. Stay under that rock.

Obviously, a comment like this: "If this really changes for the NextBox, and their newly created studios really create great and hopefully new experiences, it will be really great for us gamers. But until we get any tangible infos, some of these studios could have been built to create more Kinect centric casual stuff. I hope that's not the case. Because if Microsoft can manage to ensemble other studios of the caliber of 343, but for entirely new IPs, their next platform will be really interesting to see grow and flourish. As was the case for Sony with the PS3."

Could only have been expressed by nothing but a hater. ¬_¬

I said hater can STFU,but i did not said you're,even you looks like a hater,and more likely after this reply.

And i actually give you info,it's you didn't provide anything substantial other than your biased replies.

And of course i can-go back to check your replies in this thread.




EA will not publish timed exclusive games for its popular titles like Fifa/Nfs etc

it could be DLC deal, or possibly something to do with Battlefield which id doubt anyway, as COD would be more favourable to Microsoft, so it only leaves me with lol nothing, i wonder what it is......deffo not "all EA games on 720 1st"



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...

Dodece said:
All rumors are complete bullshit until proven otherwise. That said Microsoft's display of frugality this past generation. Obviously comes with some serious benefits. Namely that it gives them much more walking around money. This is what happens when a company holds price points for extended periods of times, run a successful subscription service, produces highly successful peripherals, and makes good game development choices. Microsoft really didn't have a lot in the way of wasted efforts.

So any person suggesting that the gaming branch of Microsoft is raiding the corporate coffers is just plain deluded. They spent last generation building a war chest, and made sacrifices to maximize their earning potential. Sometimes costing them some sales. Sometimes even giving a competitor those sales. A lot of the sales their competition got can be attributed to Microsoft holding back. Not cutting the prices of their hardware, not splurging on new studio acquisitions, and not negotiating more exclusives from third parties.

You wouldn't think it by the way some people act on these forums, but Sony probably spent more then four times as much money on their console then Microsoft spent on theirs. If outspending your competition by massive margins is a sin. Then Sony is fucking drenched in the blood of the innocent. You cannot hold other companies accountable for the fact that Sony built a money pit of a game console, and then insisted on filling that pit with billions of dollars. I haven't heard many Sony fans on all of these forums bitching, and moaning about Sony turning that console around. From either a early death, or a distant third place finish to a close third place finish.

Can we please get real if Microsoft ends up outspending Sony by a wide margin this generation. It will not be, because they are a bad company, that they are cheating, or that they are having big brother win the fight for them. It will be equal parts the fact that Sony squandered a fortune, and Microsoft built a fortune. The situation is what it is. There is no use crying foul now if you didn't cry foul back then when Sony was blowing through all that cash. That they would need to block certain moves by Microsoft this generation.

As for the rumor as per the usual I have a different view on it then everyone else. It seems to me that Microsoft doesn't have to pay Electronic Arts any money to get the definitive version of their games. This may be why Microsoft set up Skybox studio. To create apps that could be supported, and integrated into Electronic Arts sports games. Things like real time sports tickers during online play. Weekly updates of real world player stats. Perhaps during the game you could access educational videos from real gurus of the game. To give you the ins and outs of good strategy.





Brilliant post.  Absolutely spot on



My guess is wrong this time it seems.