By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - As a Nintendo fanboy,PS4 grafix blew my mind

ethomaz on 07 March 2013
radiantshadow92 said:

anyone using kilzone sf as an example of next gen graphics please stop lol...it was a trailer of a game in production utilizing only half the ram capable on the ps4 AND its one of the first games on the system. can the ps4 be a bigger leap then this gen? we dont fucking know yet.

So you just agree with me that PS4 have a big leap... thanks.

And it is not a trailer... in-game... played at conference... played in anothers places already.



Around the Network
teigaga on 07 March 2013

The biggest loss was textures, but that was before the surprise announcement.  I'm sure Unreal 4 will be up to par now.

Oh yeah considering the impressive specs of the console, I imagine it could easily run as well as a GTX680 when optimisation and everything else is considered. Honestly I was skeptical about the consoles being UE4 ready but the PS4 really did impress me. 

Yeah, the failures of that demo were 100% due to the lack of time as opposed to hardware limitations. Like the doorframe in the ps4 version doesn't even have a texture lol. If thats not rushed then I don't know what is ...



ethomaz on 07 March 2013

teigaga said:

Playstation 3 launch title  lol

Bad example... this game generated a lot of discussion if PS3 have power to make next-gen games just because the Killzone for PS2 looked close to it.

Of course Resistence had better graphcs than Killzone (PS2) but the graphical leap was smaller than what we saw with Killzone Shadown Fall to Killzone 3.



Mazty on 07 March 2013
radiantshadow92 said:

anyone using kilzone sf as an example of next gen graphics please stop lol...it was a trailer of a game in production utilizing only half the ram capable on the ps4 AND its one of the first games on the system. can the ps4 be a bigger leap then this gen? we dont fucking know yet.


Why isn't it an example? It was at 1080p 30fps constant and was pretty damn impressive. The reflections, motion blur, texture resolutions etc are far, far superior than anything this generation. 
The fact is the PS4 is already a bigger leap than this gen, but because of player perception, they won't probably notice it that much. 

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-killzone-shadow-fall-demo-tech-analysis



JazzB1987 on 07 March 2013

My mind was not blown because its basically Crysis PC graphics coming to consoles (albeit with the modern effects. Effects games in 2007 never had)


So I was more like FINALLY instead of WOOOW!!!!

For me PS4 is   alternate reality PC graphics from 2009  when PS360 would never have existed and would never have slowed down  graphical evolution.



Around the Network
ethomaz on 07 March 2013
JazzB1987 said:

My mind was not blown because its basically Crysis PC graphics coming to consoles (albeit with the modern effects. Effects games in 2007 never had)


So I was more like FINALLY instead of WOOOW!!!!

For me PS4 is   alternate reality PC graphics from 2009  when PS360 would never have existed and would never have slowed down  graphical evolution.

Show me games with better graphics than Crysis (2007) on PC... sorry but a lot of guy (incluing me) thinks the first Crysis is still better than Crysis 3 (PC).

Even if Crysis 3 have better graphics than Crysis the gap is not that big... so PC didn't have a graphical leap since 2007.



radiantshadow92 on 07 March 2013
ethomaz said:
radiantshadow92 said:

anyone using kilzone sf as an example of next gen graphics please stop lol...it was a trailer of a game in production utilizing only half the ram capable on the ps4 AND its one of the first games on the system. can the ps4 be a bigger leap then this gen? we dont fucking know yet.

So you just agree with me that PS4 have a big leap... thanks.

And it is not a trailer... in-game... played at conference... played in anothers places already.


o yeah i forgot it was playable lol. my point still stands tho we shouldnt be jumping the gun on whether or not next gen graphics are a huge leap forward. for the most part though i do agree with you. i dont see why it wouldnt be a bigger leap because the hardware is there.



JazzB1987 on 07 March 2013
ethomaz said:
JazzB1987 said:

My mind was not blown because its basically Crysis PC graphics coming to consoles (albeit with the modern effects. Effects games in 2007 never had)


So I was more like FINALLY instead of WOOOW!!!!

For me PS4 is   alternate reality PC graphics from 2009  when PS360 would never have existed and would never have slowed down  graphical evolution.

Show me games with better graphics than Crysis (2007) on PC... sorry but a lot of guy (incluing me) thinks the first Crysis is still better than Crysis 3 (PC).

Even if Crysis 3 have better graphics than Crysis the gap is not that big... so PC didn't have a graphical leap since 2007.


Are you disagreeing with me? And then saying the same I just did?    I dont really get your reply sorry  :)

I basically said that since Crysis 2007  graphics didnt "evolve" much They got some fancy new effects like the ones on Crysis 2/3 and Battlefield 3  but other than that  NOTHING happened.

PS4 looks like 2007 Crysis graphics (in terms of stuff being there/world geometry/details)  with added effects  like the ones I mentioned from Crysis 2/3 and Battlefield 3. (which are needed to hide the fact that those games look totally BLOCKY compared to Crysis1 from 2007)


So we both actually have the same opinion  or am I wrong?  :)



ethomaz on 07 March 2013

JazzB1987 said:

Are you disagreeing with me? And then saying the same I just did?    I dont really get your reply sorry  :)

I basically said that since Crysis 2007  graphics didnt "evolve" much They got some fancy new effects like the ones on Crysis 2/3 and Battlefield 3  but other than that  NOTHING happened.

PS4 looks like 2007 Crysis graphics (in terms of stuff being there/world geometry/details)  with added effects  like the ones I mentioned from Crysis 2/3 and Battlefield 3. (which are needed to hide the fact that they look totally BLOCKY compared to Crysis1 from 2007)


So we both actually have the same opinion  or am I wrong?  :)

lol sorry I misunderstood ... yeah we have the same opinion.



9087 on 07 March 2013
DieAppleDie said:


Simple
I see bigger jump current gen to PS4 grafix than Wii to PS360 grafix
Killzone demo, if was realtime PS4 performance, blew my mind, is better than anything ive never seen on my i7 2600 8GB RAM 2GB grafix card PC


You're welcome to hop on the bandwagon