To be honest, it's difficult to say how far the leap has been with just few launch games shown and also when consumers have not experienced playing any final product/software yet on the console. I would play safe by saying the leap is just like what we had from PS2 to PS3 basically.

can you see much of a noticeable visual diffrence? 

I think it'll be like Gamecube to original Wii leap to be honest.

when i read some peoples posts i wonder if they are serious or if they just try to say to themselve they see no difference. if you see no difference between a not so good looking cod blops 2 screenshot wit a resolution of 980x544 and a killzone screenshot in a resolution that game won't even have something is clearly wrong.

please look at both pics on your tv and increase the pics to the full size of your screen and tell me once more that you see no difference...

but hey, if you really see no difference congratulations, you can go back to a tv we owned before we got a hd tv! you get them for free nowadays^^

I tell you guys... the PS4 GPU have features to come to PC GPUs (pre-GCN2).

Its not about whether or not there is a graphical leap. The leap is there, whether you want to accept it or not.

However, whether that leap makes a noticeable and perceivable visual difference to the average gamer is a completely different question. And perhaps a more important one?

I don't know.

But what i do know is that when you look at a game like Killzone shadow fall and you compare it to Killzone 3 you are indeed looking at an approximate x8 the graphical improvement.

Now was Knack, Killzone: SF, Infamous, and the Drving game the best why to show off that x8 improvement over last gen? Probably not.

But that gap is there. How devs choose to use and show that gap is up to them. If naughty dog decide to make an Uncharted 4 with a game design structured the same as the previous Uncharted games..you will see a massive difference. But what if they decide to make it a much more open game? Then you probably won't.

There are little give and takes here and there. My main point is that the gap is there and its significant. Any bigger of a gap and it would be unfeasible to fit into a console. It would also be financially unfeasible to sell at a mass market price. Whether us gamers will be able to notice the massive difference will be up to developers and how they choose to use the power of the console. And as always beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Or something like that.

This game has been in development for years. Where did development start? On PC. Believe it or not, developing on final hardware will give them huge advantages like optimization. There are reports that this demo was made with only 1.5GB of RAM.

Before you comment any further, keep in mind that more RAM allows for higher-resolution textures, better animations, larger worlds...you name it. There is a reason developers are praising the PS4 and why 8GB of GDDR5 is a big deal.

Not a single person said there was no difference between generations.

What is being said is that this current jump is smaller than previous generational leaps.

 there are enough posts like "ohh which is cod and which killzone trololol" about the blops 2 and shadowfall pics.

and the difference is big between those pics, the cod pic would look even bad compared to other shooters of this gen and we talk about a comparison of this cod pic and a next gen killzone bullshot^^

HEY!!!.......just hey....