As much as I dislike a lot of what Turkish posts, I have to agree that the gs3 is the king of plastic high end phones right now. Someone at Samsung should be shot for that case design, its awful imo. Still Fordy as a point that Xperia Z isn't a particularly innovative device, although its as solid design aimed at a gap in the market and does look pretty desirable.
fordy said: As you can see from the other threads currently around for Sony Phones and tablets, many of them only look at Sony products, so when a rather un-innovative product comes to the market, there's all this sudden hype, just because it's a Sony product, which cannot really do much more compared to other products on the market.
You don't know what you're taling aboout. Calling the new Sony Xperia Z and Tablet Z un-innovative(lmao), I really think you shouldn't talk about the topic.
You don't know what you're taling aboout. Calling the new Sony Xperia Z and Tablet Z innovative(lmao), I really think you shouldn't talk about the topic.
Thats all you got, hit and run posts. Don't waste my time.
So you're posting stuff with "oh look how innovative it is!" and when somebody actually calls you on it, you say "You dont know what you're talking about".
So tell everyone....WHY is it innovative?
You are ill informed. You called these products un-innovative(wtf) that cannot do much more than other products. What is so innovative about this? Its one of the first 5" 1080p smartphones, 13MP camera, dust and water resistant, has NFC, uses Dragontrail glass, last but not least: a very sexy design that distinguishes itself from the often plastic phones of competitors.
Yep, you should probably get your eyeballs checked. What exactly will you call innovative in a smartphone then? What exactly is more innovative about the transition from GS2 to GS3?
One of the first does not equal first, sorry to tell you. The Optimus G has had a 13MP camera for several months now. NFC devices? Well...
The glass was used in phones in 2011, and doesn't even carry the same hardness rating as Gorilla Glass (Vickers 595 - 673 for Dragontrail vs Gorilla 622 - 701).
Interesting to see which is the more "plastic looking" between the two...
versus
My eyes are perfectly fine. Perhaps you should actually do some research into the matter before just spouting any old crap from the Xperia spec sheet and claiming it to be innovative...
You don't refute my point, you can't keep reinventing the wheel. If you call the Xperia Z not innovative, then no smartphone is innovative, I'm sure you won't complain with the next Galaxy or iPhone with beefed up specs though. You just wait on your phone with the flux capacitor. And between the 2? The S3 is more plastic looking.
It's not innovative, because all of the things you've touted were in phones released before it. It's a mid-high end phone, but its NOT innovative.
In the same week that Google shows off Google Glass, you're on here getting wet over a non-innovative phone? Pfft!
If you think the Xperia Z with that plastic back case looks less plastic than the Galaxy III, then I'm afraid it's you whos eyes need checking. Ask the optometrists to remove that rose-tint out of them while you're at it. It's doing serious damage to your judgement...
Its glass friend.
vs this
Come to me when your phone has a flux capacitor, Google Glass is not innovative, glasses exist for centuries. (using your logic lol)
Oh, innovative glass case like....the iPhone from years ago?
You said which one LOOKS more plastic. Too bad your "glass" setup has that "plastic" look to it, huh?
Stick to your Sony phones (and regular glasses if you want), the rest of us will be over in the next generation.
What you mean to say is, "what happen to gamers over the years" I can't go anywhere without seeing a "expose video", Nintendo fanboys, Sony fanboy, MS fanboys who always complaining about specs instead of a game being good, a game can look awesome, but if the game play like crap, it's crap. Prefect example: Final Fantasy 13.
“Don’t follow the hype, follow the games”
—
Here a little quote I want for those to keep memorize in your head for this coming next gen.
vgc. 2007 was a very hostile environment for anyone who didn't own a wii or even breathed the word playstation.
Playstation owners are not arrogant. Football fans are arrogant. Whats wrong with liking the consoel you have brought? Or liking the look of a console you may buy in the future?
Nothing. Just because people want to get happy about a product they are looking forward to doesnt mean they are arrogant. It means they like what they purchase. Simple as that to be honest mate.
Threads from PlayStation owners going on about other consoles? I am sure it happens the other way around aswell. and to be honest i aint seen a negative thread about other consoles that are non playstation on here.
Actually if you look around on this site, it is popular opinion that the xbox next will sell the most next gen, though i disagree but that is another thread entirely.
Problem is if you come on here looking for negative topics that suit your agenda you will find them. I am sure if i look hard enough i could find positives with Adolf Hitler. You are just being silly.
Fanboyism is lame, nobody's contesting that. What I do contest is the prevalence of it. There may be some threads and post during the initial rush of new information (e.g. PS4 conference or the next E3), but after a day or so, things calmed down. Now, I see this forum spending more time complaining about fanboyism, than actually discussing games. At least fanboys are good in the sense that they're still fucking talking about games.
1) Not a fan of D3, but I've heard some pundits/commentators saying that D3 is consolized. It sounds to me that you're obsessing WAYYY to much over a specific poster. Just fucking ignore him (and it sounds like he made his point and left).
2) Gifs should die purely because they clog the forum and are annoying. I have no idea what you mean about the "domination" mentality. I just see a bunch of stupid Kaz gifs. Again, you sound like you're imagining stuff.
3) THE PS4 JUST GOT FUCKING ANNOUNCED. It's been like, less than a week? Holy shit, of course there's fucking hype over it. Jesus Christ.
4) Again, things are probably excited right after the announcement. 2nd thread is shit, but the first one isn't that bad. First thread is also talking specificly about journalists (and a specific article). Again, wayyyy to sensative.
The third thread is a posting of an article. Didn't read, but if it seemed like it was about the speculation regarding MS's positioning with the X Box. Um, should we not have threads about this?
Again, you just sound like this:
You're doing it right now. You're putting down my argument by mocking me with the youtube vid.
1) The points I gave have little to do with any obsession. You asked for an example, I gave it to you. You will try to divert this by saying "I'm obsessed with one user", but you're not addressing the facts. That he called the D3 guys whiners and didn't address the points (until I confronted him) and just was mocking. You're now doing the same thing, ignoring the points. There's a reason and a pattern to that: you either have an agenda or are unable to discuss the facts.
2) The gifs of Kaz Tyranosaurus eating Reggie? The one of Kaz in the saw scene killing Reggie and the MS guy? On and on. You didn't even address any of the points I made about the tone of the violence and general tone of "Sony domination".
3) This didn't happen for the U, the 3DS or the Vita.
4) You asked for examples, I gave them to you. How does that show I'm too sensitive? The MS one should be clear by the title that it's just trolling and diminishing the nextbox.
Your youtube vid shows how committed you are about talking the points versus attacking me personally.
My opinion is there is too much fanboyism, and those that defend it are not any better.
1) It was a short post, where he looked like he wasn't being serious (shown by the smiley face). I say you're obsessed, because it's not reasonable for you to get so fucking offended by a post like that.
2) Again, those are just stupid and silly. That's really more of a symptom of how immature and young this forum is.
3) Err, there were definetly threads and excitements over those threads.
4) You gave shit examples. I expected you to give me some really obvious examples, and you gave me examples that make you look like you're reading WAYYY too much into them, and are overly sensitive.
Again, you sound like him. A self victimizing fascist.
"They're constantly SHOUTING DOWN. That's important to remember. SHOUTING DOWN on campuses anybody who disagrees with them. This is an "open" place, this an "open" society, this is a place where we're free to exchange ideas. Unless they disagree with you. Then you're SHOUTED down or bullied."
Again, you sound like a self victimizing fascist. Like this guy:
I don't know what the fuck this guy's talking about. This console war shiz wasn't that big of a deal in the 6th and 5th gen. It's only become this way due to everyone and their grandmother being able to access the internet easily and quickly at all time these days.
Also, your memory must suck. A recent example how this shit goes both way: the Vita was doomed the minute 3DS was announced. Don't even try to deny the shit the Vita went through even before we knew anything about it. Took a 70$ price cut, giving Nintendo their first money loser, a Zelda remake, new Mario Kart and a new Mario to get the system to take off.