This is getting a little off-topic..You can't really say that meat -lovers are hypocrites because they bash sony for their PR stunt. Killing animals for food, or hunting them for sport is more or less socially accepted. Sure, in many cases the animals are being killed in a horrible manner which is condemned by society, but it's the status quo that animals are used for nourishment or recreation in hunting.((It is in anyone's opinion to justify or not this).
If you start accusing people for eating meat as being hypocritic, while the same don't know how the animal was killed, you may as well go after a bride who does not know that her wedding ring contains a blood diamond from Africa. Anyone of us may have this moment in his wallet, a money bill that was used in a drug deal. Does that make us participants on crime?
The point is, and many that have posted in this thread didn't get it (except lolita, btw love your avatar.) that the animal in case was not killed to be served at the party, it's purpose was to recreate with the vulgarity of the scene. I'm greek, and never in modern times or ancient was an animal served raw or uncooked.(We don't do sushi,LOL) If this was meant to resemble a sacrifical lamp in ancient times, the animals that were killed in the name of gods were considered taboo, and were never touched. Plus, every animal that was killed in ancient times was always skinned before eating. And the servings from inside the goat could never come from the same animal in such quantities to serve a whole party. So they must have come from other animals that were pre-cooked.
So. in conclusion, the goat was meant to shock in the sight of the corpse, and this can't be justified for the kill. It's as juvenile and cruel as kids who torture little birds. they have the excuse of young age, but Sony is not a person, it's a corporation that must maintain a civil and proper face. But they continue on the trend on bad publicity=free advertising.Sad.