The Wii has a 1-core 729 MHz CPU vs. the 3DS 2-core CPU which is underclock at 800 MHz a core on pre-install firmware for battery life.

And the 3DS also has a way more efficient RAM then the 360 & PS3 RAM.

The 3DS has better AI & Lighting & etc. etc.

So what are you talking about?

Amd the 3DS is now on firmware 4.5.0-10U so it's CPU is clock even higher per core, but still underclock from whatever the max is.

Uhhhhhh... how does 3D negate the need for draw distance?  Out of the games you mentioned, none of them have very strong draw distance except maybe Kid Icarus, but that's on rails (at least the parts that would really have you looking into the distance), so that's a bit different.  Crashmo wouldn't have anything to do with that, and I doubt Fire Emblem would either.

Never played Mario and Sonic @ the olympics.  Maybe it does look better on the 3DS, but that doesn't really matter when the majority of games look clearly better on the Wii.  New Super Mario Bros vs New Super Mario Bros 2, Mario Galaxy vs Super Mario 3D Land, Monster Hunter Tri vs Ultimate and so on so forth.  Even Luigi's Mansion clearly has some major advantages over Dark Moon.

As for shaders, and clock speed, you're making the same mistake the "Wii U is weaker than X-Box" crowd is making.  You're pulling numbers out of their context.  For example you mentioned that the 3DS is a dual core @ 800 MHz.  That may be true (or it may not be), but that's an ARM processor which is entirely different than the kind of processor in the Wii, which doesn't produce three images across two screens.  It's an apples and orange comparison.  50 shader cores means nothing unless you know more about the architecture of the GPU.

The only thing that really matters is how games look, and by now we've got a lot of evidence that shows Wii games look better than the 3DS.  Mario Kart Wii vs 7, Mario Galaxy vs Super Mario 3D Land, NSMB 2 vs Wii, Monster Hunter Tri vs Ultimate, and so on so forth. 

3D does a lot of things, making graphics more "crisp" is not one of them. More "blurry" would be more accurate.

The 3DS has a high clock speed but that's all cut in half in order to display games in stereoscopic 3D, because it's a double-image.  And I don't know why you're mentioning 360 and PS3 RAM... I mean you're way off the mark, there.  You can't honestly be comparing current HD consoles to a Nintendo portable.  C'mon, now.

I'm as big a Nintendo fan as it gets, and even I know when something sounds askew.

But the Wii has been out for 5 years in 2011 compare to the 3DS 1 year in 2011, so developers haven't gotten use to it as much.

But how does Resident Evil 4 on Wii compare to Resident Evil Revelations in person? (to help me understand the difference)

The only other things I know about the 3DS GPU is that it's clocked at 400 MHz and drains 0.5 Hz to 1.0 Hz of its power consumption and that it has 1600 m triangles and it is said to be 15.3 million polygons vertex performance with at least 4 vertex pipelines.

I Was just saying that the RAM is way more efficient which helps at in games, especially when it's a 128 FCRAM in the 3DS
I know the consoles are 512 MB RAMs, but I was talking about how way much more efficient the 3DS FCRAM is.

Plus the 3DS FCRAM is clearly more better then the Wii and can also take care of the double image. Plus the 1 extra image does not cut the processing in half, and even if it did, it would still be 71 MHz more powerful then the Wii.

Plus Zelda Ocarina of Time 3D requires Firmware 1.2 to play and other 3DS games require firmware 2.2 to be able to play

Mario & Sonic is a quite impressive game graphically, that's true. As for Spider Man, the game looks the same on both consoles, but that's because it was a 3DS game ported to the Wii. The small screen of the 3DS is tricking your eyes, while it does produce great graphics, Wii games have more geometry and higher resolution textures than 3DS games. Playing Wii and 3DS side to side you can see it quite easily, compare textures in 3D Land to Galaxy, for example, or in Mario Kart 7 to Mario Kart Wii and you'll see quite a difference. About Pilotwings Resort and Wii Sports Resort, i can't say anything, as I haven't played either.

Specs don't tell the whole story.  The fact is, even if 3DS's 3D switch is turned all the way off, all games designed for 3DS have to be developed with 3D in mind.  In other words, 3DS games would all look better if developers didn't have to make them all run in 3D mode even though most people don't even turn it on.

You're comparing Wii's CPU clock to 3DS's, but that's apples and oranges.  The number you used, "71MHz" difference between Wii and 3DS means absolutely nothing, as they are completely different architectures.