The filesystem is 16MB, when running there's 32MB of the system's memory reserved for it. Will you ever understand the stuff you read?

the ram amount is the least of the wii problem, it's the bandwidth speed that's the problem. 

Every system has its bottleneck. For the PS3 and 360, it was RAM quantity. Having more than double their RAM gives the Wii U a distinct advantage.

I'm going to be honest, I wouldn't mind one bit if Nintendo decided to stick with cel-shading for Zelda.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360_system_software  it has access, doesn't mean is reserved, now unless microsoft made a rule of not touching the 16mb then fine, but we really don't know, cause when your playing a game they could let you use those 16mb if they wanted too, cause you would not be using the os.

is there a ignore feature on this forum.

I'm not a fan, for me cel shading too often results in bland masses of colour. I don't want it  to look like Skyrim, that would be boring, but that Zelda tech demo looks exactly how my dream Wii U Zelda would look; such an elegant blend of realistic yet stylised. 

Looking at Nintendo's history though, (Skyward Sword, the DS Zeldas, Wind Waker on GC -a console similiar in philosophy to Wii U- and Wind Waker HD) I'm sure we'll get one that's too cartoony for me. Does Nintendo not realize how many gamers would be sold by a "Twilight Princess in modern graphics" visual look for the next entry instead of another toon one?

You don't know that. The 22.4GB/s on the 360 is theoretical, and it is not able to get to this peak. In addition, it uses half for reads and half for writes, so theoretical max of 11.2GB/s for reads, the WiiU can use the full 12.8 for reads (if this is the actual number, developers have suggested real-world performance appears to be much higher). Since most of the writing to the RAM can be done when a scene or level is loaded, the RAM usage would be very read heavy during properly coded games (and would be greatly optimized by the customized memory controller), meaning this 'bottleneck' may not be the huge issue you're making it out to be. You also aren't taking into account latency, which is a huge factor. Nintendo has said the memory system is very low latency, and developers have confirmed this in their praise of the memory architecture. The cache memory on the GPU and CPU's is also much larger and faster than that on the 360, meaning cache misses resulting in lost real-world FLOPS are greatly reduced or eliminated (and the OOOE on the CPU further reduces cache miss performance loss for CPU tasks, a major issue holding back the performance on the 360's CPU compared to its theoretical performance), another reason why a straight-line comparison is a moot point. Also, there is a more efficient, modern memory controller onboard (meaning the theoretical max is much closer to real-world, and that R/W optomizations are used to maximize bandwidth and cache usage, eliminating or greatly reducing the theoretical bottleneck you describe), as well as hardware texture compression that also goes against your point. Future 'ground-up' games for the system will prove me right.

Yes... don't reply. o.O

Absolutely not. I spent most of this gen with Wii + PC and still bought a 360. 360 is less popular among PC games, sure, but that is because they don't know that the console has way more than Halo, Gears and Forza, which is just what you proved in this post. You can't play Ace Combat 6, Dead or Alive 4, Magna Carta 2, Lost Odyssey, Blue Dragon, Banjo-Kazooie, Project Sylpheed, Infinite Undiscovery, PGR, Perfect Dark, Kameo, Viva Pinãta, etc, and many exclusive XB Live Arcade games on the PS3 or PC. Also, the multiplats that aren't on PC have their better versions on the 360, like Eternal Sonata, Red Dead Redemption, Star Ocean 4, AC Assault Horizon, etc, so the whole argument you made is because you don't know the game library of the Xbox.

That stuff about PS3 having more exclusives isn't real, both the 360 and Wii have more exclusives than PS3, it just happens that somebody decided to say otherwise and nobody cares about actually looking the game library of the consoles. I'm sure if you looked deeper into 360's library you would probably have found many other exclusives that you could care about.

About 360 vs PC multiplats I totally agree with you. I just have a 360 here for the exclusives and better versions of PS3 multiplats, because every other game that releases on every platform i buy for PC, which has better graphics, control options and prices. Buying multiplatform games for 360 that are also on PC makes no sense(considering you have a capable PC, of course).