By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Wii U graphics power finally revealed - "we can now finally rule out any next-gen pretensions for the Wii U"

ninjablade on 06 February 2013
KHlover said:
ninjablade said:
DieAppleDie said:
ninjablade said:
for anybody asking about blops 2 on wiiu it was the worst version by far http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-black-ops-2-wii-u-face-off read.



youre twisting and lying as always ive seen the video and overall it runs like PS3 version, sloppy 360>>>>PS3~WiiU


did you try reading the article, before saying i'm lying, which,i never do. here is a quote.

The Wii U version matches the look of the Xbox 360 game and thus gives it an edge visually over the PlayStation 3 release, but unfortunately it comes up well short in terms of performance - an aspect that is all-important to the playability of a COD title.

"Still, on the plus side, the multiplayer component of the game has emerged unscathed"

Easily the most important sentence of the review. 99% of all CoD players do not care about the campaign, so the multiplayer being unscathed is more relevant than some framerate issues in the campaign.

99% of all CoD players don't care about the wii u version, still the point remains the campaign which is where the graphics look the best and push the consoles, the wii u is the worst version, i think any gamer would rather have slightly worst graphics then poor fram rate, epic micky 2 on wiiu runs like crap, even though it looks as good as the 360 version, doesn't  mean its even close to being called equal.



Around the Network
ninjablade on 06 February 2013
twilight_link said:
DieAppleDie said:
ninjablade said:
DieAppleDie said:
ninjablade said:
for anybody asking about blops 2 on wiiu it was the worst version by far http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-black-ops-2-wii-u-face-off read.



youre twisting and lying as always ive seen the video and overall it runs like PS3 version, sloppy 360>>>>PS3~WiiU


did you try reading the article, here is a quote.

The Wii U version matches the look of the Xbox 360 game and thus gives it an edge visually over the PlayStation 3 release, but unfortunately it comes up well short in terms of performance - an aspect that is all-important to the playability of a COD title. 



so you admit lying when you said WiiU version is the worst by far, good PS3 and WiiU versions are equally bad, being the 360 one the most recommendable......thats the truth


WiiU version of CoD is rushed port from different architecture to system which in time of this game development was work in progress, no final SDK, even devkit was finalized few months before launch (in time of E3 2012), this guy ninjablade appears to be absolutely clueless about topic he try to participate

your the one who seems clueless, some body said the wii u version is 1080p, i said its sub hd and the worst version which is true, try reading before posting.



KHlover on 06 February 2013
ninjablade said:
KHlover said:
ninjablade said:
DieAppleDie said:
ninjablade said:
for anybody asking about blops 2 on wiiu it was the worst version by far http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-black-ops-2-wii-u-face-off read.



youre twisting and lying as always ive seen the video and overall it runs like PS3 version, sloppy 360>>>>PS3~WiiU


did you try reading the article, before saying i'm lying, which,i never do. here is a quote.

The Wii U version matches the look of the Xbox 360 game and thus gives it an edge visually over the PlayStation 3 release, but unfortunately it comes up well short in terms of performance - an aspect that is all-important to the playability of a COD title.

"Still, on the plus side, the multiplayer component of the game has emerged unscathed"

Easily the most important sentence of the review. 99% of all CoD players do not care about the campaign, so the multiplayer being unscathed is more relevant than some framerate issues in the campaign.

99% of all CoD players don't care about the wii u version, still the point remains the campaign which is where the graphics look the best and push the consoles, the wii u is the worst version, i think any gamer would rather have slightly worst graphics then poor fram rate, epic micky 2 on wiiu runs like crap, even though it looks as good as the 360 version, doesn't  mean its even close to being called equal.

Hahaha, you're just too funny. The 3 hour campaign of CoD pushes consoles? Not the excellent multiplayer? Thanks for enlightening me, I would never have come to this conclusion by myself



Some useful VGChartz tweaks

Member of the "An Unbiased Review" Database team

JWeinCom on 06 February 2013
twilight_link said:
DieAppleDie said:
ninjablade said:
DieAppleDie said:
ninjablade said:
for anybody asking about blops 2 on wiiu it was the worst version by far http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-black-ops-2-wii-u-face-off read.



youre twisting and lying as always ive seen the video and overall it runs like PS3 version, sloppy 360>>>>PS3~WiiU


did you try reading the article, here is a quote.

The Wii U version matches the look of the Xbox 360 game and thus gives it an edge visually over the PlayStation 3 release, but unfortunately it comes up well short in terms of performance - an aspect that is all-important to the playability of a COD title. 



so you admit lying when you said WiiU version is the worst by far, good PS3 and WiiU versions are equally bad, being the 360 one the most recommendable......thats the truth


WiiU version of CoD is rushed port from different architecture to system which in time of this game development was work in progress, no final SDK, even devkit was finalized few months before launch (in time of E3 2012), this guy ninjablade appears to be absolutely clueless about topic he try to participate


Then please for the love of god just stop replying.



ninjablade on 06 February 2013
KHlover said:
ninjablade said:
KHlover said:
ninjablade said:
DieAppleDie said:
ninjablade said:
for anybody asking about blops 2 on wiiu it was the worst version by far http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-black-ops-2-wii-u-face-off read.



youre twisting and lying as always ive seen the video and overall it runs like PS3 version, sloppy 360>>>>PS3~WiiU


did you try reading the article, before saying i'm lying, which,i never do. here is a quote.

The Wii U version matches the look of the Xbox 360 game and thus gives it an edge visually over the PlayStation 3 release, but unfortunately it comes up well short in terms of performance - an aspect that is all-important to the playability of a COD title.

"Still, on the plus side, the multiplayer component of the game has emerged unscathed"

Easily the most important sentence of the review. 99% of all CoD players do not care about the campaign, so the multiplayer being unscathed is more relevant than some framerate issues in the campaign.

99% of all CoD players don't care about the wii u version, still the point remains the campaign which is where the graphics look the best and push the consoles, the wii u is the worst version, i think any gamer would rather have slightly worst graphics then poor fram rate, epic micky 2 on wiiu runs like crap, even though it looks as good as the 360 version, doesn't  mean its even close to being called equal.

Hahaha, you're just too funny. The 3 hour campaign of CoD pushes consoles? Not the excellent multiplayer? Thanks for enlightening me, I would never have come to this conclusion by myself


huh which has better graphics the campaign or multiplayer, which is why it has worst framerate, the campaign is graphically more demanding then the multiplayer, its always been like that.



Around the Network
KHlover on 06 February 2013
ninjablade said:
KHlover said:
ninjablade said:
KHlover said:
ninjablade said:
DieAppleDie said:
ninjablade said:
for anybody asking about blops 2 on wiiu it was the worst version by far http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-black-ops-2-wii-u-face-off read.



youre twisting and lying as always ive seen the video and overall it runs like PS3 version, sloppy 360>>>>PS3~WiiU


did you try reading the article, before saying i'm lying, which,i never do. here is a quote.

The Wii U version matches the look of the Xbox 360 game and thus gives it an edge visually over the PlayStation 3 release, but unfortunately it comes up well short in terms of performance - an aspect that is all-important to the playability of a COD title.

"Still, on the plus side, the multiplayer component of the game has emerged unscathed"

Easily the most important sentence of the review. 99% of all CoD players do not care about the campaign, so the multiplayer being unscathed is more relevant than some framerate issues in the campaign.

99% of all CoD players don't care about the wii u version, still the point remains the campaign which is where the graphics look the best and push the consoles, the wii u is the worst version, i think any gamer would rather have slightly worst graphics then poor fram rate, epic micky 2 on wiiu runs like crap, even though it looks as good as the 360 version, doesn't  mean its even close to being called equal.

Hahaha, you're just too funny. The 3 hour campaign of CoD pushes consoles? Not the excellent multiplayer? Thanks for enlightening me, I would never have come to this conclusion by myself


huh which has better graphics the campaign or multiplayer, which is why it has worst framerate, the campaign is graphically more demanding then the multiplayer, its always been like that.

But most gamers bought that game for the multiplayer, primarily - solely for the multiplayer. -> MP pushed SW/HW sales, SP is irrelevant.



Some useful VGChartz tweaks

Member of the "An Unbiased Review" Database team

gronk-bonk on 06 February 2013
ninjablade said:
KHlover said:
ninjablade said:
DieAppleDie said:
ninjablade said:
for anybody asking about blops 2 on wiiu it was the worst version by far http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-black-ops-2-wii-u-face-off read.



youre twisting and lying as always ive seen the video and overall it runs like PS3 version, sloppy 360>>>>PS3~WiiU


did you try reading the article, before saying i'm lying, which,i never do. here is a quote.

The Wii U version matches the look of the Xbox 360 game and thus gives it an edge visually over the PlayStation 3 release, but unfortunately it comes up well short in terms of performance - an aspect that is all-important to the playability of a COD title.

"Still, on the plus side, the multiplayer component of the game has emerged unscathed"

Easily the most important sentence of the review. 99% of all CoD players do not care about the campaign, so the multiplayer being unscathed is more relevant than some framerate issues in the campaign.

99% of all CoD players don't care about the wii u version, still the point remains the campaign which is where the graphics look the best and push the consoles, the wii u is the worst version, i think any gamer would rather have slightly worst graphics then poor fram rate, epic micky 2 on wiiu runs like crap, even though it looks as good as the 360 version, doesn't  mean its even close to being called equal.


it's not the Wii U fault for the lower performance of multiplats. It is a new console with a different architeecture. Developers need more time with the console, something they did not have because of the launch. It is common sense. 



Bet with ninjablade:

Ninjablade wins if the next 5 multiplat on the wii u are inferior to the 360 version.

I win if one of the 5 mulitplats are on par or superior on the Wii U.

ninjablade on 06 February 2013
KHlover said:
ninjablade said:
KHlover said:
ninjablade said:
KHlover said:
ninjablade said:
DieAppleDie said:
ninjablade said:
for anybody asking about blops 2 on wiiu it was the worst version by far http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-black-ops-2-wii-u-face-off read.



youre twisting and lying as always ive seen the video and overall it runs like PS3 version, sloppy 360>>>>PS3~WiiU


did you try reading the article, before saying i'm lying, which,i never do. here is a quote.

The Wii U version matches the look of the Xbox 360 game and thus gives it an edge visually over the PlayStation 3 release, but unfortunately it comes up well short in terms of performance - an aspect that is all-important to the playability of a COD title.

"Still, on the plus side, the multiplayer component of the game has emerged unscathed"

Easily the most important sentence of the review. 99% of all CoD players do not care about the campaign, so the multiplayer being unscathed is more relevant than some framerate issues in the campaign.

99% of all CoD players don't care about the wii u version, still the point remains the campaign which is where the graphics look the best and push the consoles, the wii u is the worst version, i think any gamer would rather have slightly worst graphics then poor fram rate, epic micky 2 on wiiu runs like crap, even though it looks as good as the 360 version, doesn't  mean its even close to being called equal.

Hahaha, you're just too funny. The 3 hour campaign of CoD pushes consoles? Not the excellent multiplayer? Thanks for enlightening me, I would never have come to this conclusion by myself


huh which has better graphics the campaign or multiplayer, which is why it has worst framerate, the campaign is graphically more demanding then the multiplayer, its always been like that.

But most gamers bought that game for the multiplayer, primarily - solely for the multiplayer. -> MP pushed SW/HW sales, SP is irrelevant.

you can say the samething wiiu version, it's irrevelant because 99% of people won't buy that version, but were not talking about what people prefer, where talking only techincal here.



KHlover on 06 February 2013
ninjablade said:
KHlover said:
ninjablade said:
KHlover said:
ninjablade said:
KHlover said:
ninjablade said:
DieAppleDie said:
ninjablade said:
for anybody asking about blops 2 on wiiu it was the worst version by far http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-black-ops-2-wii-u-face-off read.



youre twisting and lying as always ive seen the video and overall it runs like PS3 version, sloppy 360>>>>PS3~WiiU


did you try reading the article, before saying i'm lying, which,i never do. here is a quote.

The Wii U version matches the look of the Xbox 360 game and thus gives it an edge visually over the PlayStation 3 release, but unfortunately it comes up well short in terms of performance - an aspect that is all-important to the playability of a COD title.

"Still, on the plus side, the multiplayer component of the game has emerged unscathed"

Easily the most important sentence of the review. 99% of all CoD players do not care about the campaign, so the multiplayer being unscathed is more relevant than some framerate issues in the campaign.

99% of all CoD players don't care about the wii u version, still the point remains the campaign which is where the graphics look the best and push the consoles, the wii u is the worst version, i think any gamer would rather have slightly worst graphics then poor fram rate, epic micky 2 on wiiu runs like crap, even though it looks as good as the 360 version, doesn't  mean its even close to being called equal.

Hahaha, you're just too funny. The 3 hour campaign of CoD pushes consoles? Not the excellent multiplayer? Thanks for enlightening me, I would never have come to this conclusion by myself


huh which has better graphics the campaign or multiplayer, which is why it has worst framerate, the campaign is graphically more demanding then the multiplayer, its always been like that.

But most gamers bought that game for the multiplayer, primarily - solely for the multiplayer. -> MP pushed SW/HW sales, SP is irrelevant.

you can say the samething wiiu version, it's irrevelant because 99% of people won't buy that version, but were not talking about what people prefer, where talking only techincal here.

Misunderstanding here. I interpreted "push the consoles" as saleswise while you seem to have intended it as "push the consoles hardwarewise". Sorry there^^



Some useful VGChartz tweaks

Member of the "An Unbiased Review" Database team

ninjablade on 06 February 2013
gronk-bonk said:
ninjablade said:
KHlover said:
ninjablade said:
DieAppleDie said:
ninjablade said:
for anybody asking about blops 2 on wiiu it was the worst version by far http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-black-ops-2-wii-u-face-off read.



youre twisting and lying as always ive seen the video and overall it runs like PS3 version, sloppy 360>>>>PS3~WiiU


did you try reading the article, before saying i'm lying, which,i never do. here is a quote.

The Wii U version matches the look of the Xbox 360 game and thus gives it an edge visually over the PlayStation 3 release, but unfortunately it comes up well short in terms of performance - an aspect that is all-important to the playability of a COD title.

"Still, on the plus side, the multiplayer component of the game has emerged unscathed"

Easily the most important sentence of the review. 99% of all CoD players do not care about the campaign, so the multiplayer being unscathed is more relevant than some framerate issues in the campaign.

99% of all CoD players don't care about the wii u version, still the point remains the campaign which is where the graphics look the best and push the consoles, the wii u is the worst version, i think any gamer would rather have slightly worst graphics then poor fram rate, epic micky 2 on wiiu runs like crap, even though it looks as good as the 360 version, doesn't  mean its even close to being called equal.


it's not the Wii U fault for the lower performance of multiplats. It is a new console with a different architeecture. Developers need more time with the console, something they did not have because of the launch. It is common sense.

will its wiiu fualt and its not, the reason why most ports are inferior is because in some aspects its weaker then 360, cpu and memory bandwidth, can developers with more time get around the bottle necks, probably but i'm not 100% sure till i start seeing better MP versions on the wiiu.