ninjablade said:
KHlover said:
ninjablade said:
KHlover said:
ninjablade said:
DieAppleDie said:
youre twisting and lying as always ive seen the video and overall it runs like PS3 version, sloppy 360>>>>PS3~WiiU
|
did you try reading the article, before saying i'm lying, which,i never do. here is a quote.
The Wii U version matches the look of the Xbox 360 game and thus gives it an edge visually over the PlayStation 3 release, but unfortunately it comes up well short in terms of performance - an aspect that is all-important to the playability of a COD title.
|
"Still, on the plus side, the multiplayer component of the game has emerged unscathed"
Easily the most important sentence of the review. 99% of all CoD players do not care about the campaign, so the multiplayer being unscathed is more relevant than some framerate issues in the campaign.
|
99% of all CoD players don't care about the wii u version, still the point remains the campaign which is where the graphics look the best and push the consoles, the wii u is the worst version, i think any gamer would rather have slightly worst graphics then poor fram rate, epic micky 2 on wiiu runs like crap, even though it looks as good as the 360 version, doesn't mean its even close to being called equal.
|
Hahaha, you're just too funny. The 3 hour campaign of CoD pushes consoles? Not the excellent multiplayer? Thanks for enlightening me, I would never have come to this conclusion by myself 
|
huh which has better graphics the campaign or multiplayer, which is why it has worst framerate, the campaign is graphically more demanding then the multiplayer, its always been like that.
|
But most gamers bought that game for the multiplayer, primarily - solely for the multiplayer. -> MP pushed SW/HW sales, SP is irrelevant.
