By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ninjablade said:
KHlover said:
ninjablade said:
DieAppleDie said:
ninjablade said:
for anybody asking about blops 2 on wiiu it was the worst version by far http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-black-ops-2-wii-u-face-off read.



youre twisting and lying as always ive seen the video and overall it runs like PS3 version, sloppy 360>>>>PS3~WiiU


did you try reading the article, before saying i'm lying, which,i never do. here is a quote.

The Wii U version matches the look of the Xbox 360 game and thus gives it an edge visually over the PlayStation 3 release, but unfortunately it comes up well short in terms of performance - an aspect that is all-important to the playability of a COD title.

"Still, on the plus side, the multiplayer component of the game has emerged unscathed"

Easily the most important sentence of the review. 99% of all CoD players do not care about the campaign, so the multiplayer being unscathed is more relevant than some framerate issues in the campaign.

99% of all CoD players don't care about the wii u version, still the point remains the campaign which is where the graphics look the best and push the consoles, the wii u is the worst version, i think any gamer would rather have slightly worst graphics then poor fram rate, epic micky 2 on wiiu runs like crap, even though it looks as good as the 360 version, doesn't  mean its even close to being called equal.

Hahaha, you're just too funny. The 3 hour campaign of CoD pushes consoles? Not the excellent multiplayer? Thanks for enlightening me, I would never have come to this conclusion by myself